Abstract
For at least 2400 years observers of the human condition have debated whether humans were rational or irrational, which itself is a variation on the question of whether we are basically good or evil. We cannot be good if we are irrational, although being rational does not guarantee that we will be good. In fact, part of the genius of modern economics is to insist that we are rational and selfish (although economists notoriously save the game by arguing that the invisible hand of the market balances selfish individuals to make for a good society). Thanks to economics, images of rational calculators have recently triumphed over images of irrational crowds in this age-old clash of political theories. Emotions have always been at the heart of these controversies.
Only the love of honor is forever young, and not riches, as some say. Honor is the delight of men when they are old and useless.
Pericles
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 the authors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jasper, J.M. (2006). Emotions and the Microfoundations of Politics: Rethinking Ends and Means. In: Clarke, S., Hoggett, P., Thompson, S. (eds) Emotion, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627895_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627895_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54578-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62789-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)