Skip to main content

The Transition from Development Administration to New Public Management: an Interpretative Exploration

  • Chapter
Book cover Managing Development in a Global Context

Abstract

The internationalization of the theory and practice of public administration is a phenomenon closely related to the creation and evolution of the modern world system. Its roots are found in the European colonial expansion into the New World and subsequently Asia and Africa. The overseas empires and administrative systems that evolved there corresponded to particular modalities of accumulation in different historical periods. In the earlier cases of seventeenth-century Spain and Portugal, the mold was mercantile, while in the cases of British, French, Dutch, or Belgian expansion in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, modern capitalism prevailed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Astley, W. Graham and Andrew Van de Ven (1983) “Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, pp. 245–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, M. Jide and Gelase Mutahaba (1999) “Redynamizing the African Civil Service for the Twent-first Century,” in Bureaucracy and the Alternatives in World Perspective, Londom: Macmillan, pp. 190–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, William and Ronning Neale (1966) Internal Security and Military Power: Counterinsurgency and Civic Action in Latin America. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 217–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, Gerald E. and O. P. Dwivedi (2001) “Official Ethics and Corruption,” in Gerald E. Caiden, O. P. Dwivedi and Joseph G. Jabbra (eds), Where Corruption Lives. Bloomfield, Conn., USA: Kumarian Press, pp. 244–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, Gerald E., O. P. Dwivedi and Joseph G. Jabbra (eds) (2001) Where Corruption Lives. Bloomfield, Conn., USA: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O. P. (1987) “Moral Dimensions of Statecraft: a Plea for an Administrative Theology,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 20, 4, pp. 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O. P. (1994) Development Administration: From Underdevelopment to Sustainable Development. London, Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O. P. and James Iain Gow (1999) From Bureaucracy to Public Management: the Administrative Culture of the Government of Canada. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, Barry, Rocamora Joel, and Wilson, Richard (1993) Low Intensity Democracy: Political Power in the New World Order. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Rensselaer W. (1988) “Dimensions of the South American Cocaine Industry,” Journal of Interamerican Studies, 30, 3, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, Crawford Brough (1977) The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, James (1977) “Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America: the Modal Pattern,” in James Malloy (ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzer, R. (1984) “Policy Rationality and Policy Analysis: the Problem of the Choice of Criteria for Decisoion-making,” in O. P. Dwivedi (ed.), Policy and Administrative Studies. Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph, pp. 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1957) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nef, Jorge (1982) “Empate politico, inmobilismo e inflacion: Algunas notas preliminares,” Revista Centroamericana de Administration PGblica, 2, 3 (July–December), pp. 141–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nef, Jorge (1997) “Estado, poder y politicas sociales: una vision critica,” in Raril Urzûa (ed.) Cambios sociales y politica ptblicas en América Latina. Santiago: Andros, pp. 233–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nef, J. and Dwivedi, O. P. (1981) “Development Theory and Administration: a Fence Around an Empty Lot?,” The Indian Journal of Public Administration, 28, 1 (January–March), pp. 42–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nef, J. and Robles, W. (2000) “Globalization, Neoliberalism and the State of Underdevelopment in the New Periphery” (with Wilder Robles), Journal of Developing Societies, 16, 1 (Leiden: Brill), pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, Theobald (1995) “Globalization and the Resurgence of the Patrimonial State,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 61, 3 (September) pp. 423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, Wilder (2000) “Beyond the Politics of Protest: the Landless Rural Workers Movement of Brazil,” Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 21, 3, pp. 657–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohr, John A. (1988) “Bureaucratic Morality in the United States,” International Political Science Review, 9, 3, pp. 167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. and Halligan, J. (1999) “Bureaucracy and the Alternatives in East and Southeast Asia,” in Keith M. Henderson and O. P. Dwivedi (eds), Bureaucracy and the Alternatives in World Perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 129–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1998) Good Governance and Sustainable Human Development. New York: UNDP (UNDP/Docs/UN98–1.PDF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilas, Carlos (1995) “Economic Restructuring, Neoliberal Reforms and the Working Class in Latin America,” in S. Halebsky and R. Harris (eds), Capital, Power and Inequality in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilas, Carlos (2000) “¿Máps allá del Consenso de Washington? Un enfoque desde la política de algunas propuestas del Banco Mundial sobre reforma administrativa,” Revista del CLAD. Reforma y Democracia, 18 (October), pp. 25–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 O.P. Dwivedi, R. Khator, J. Nef

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dwivedi, O.P., Khator, R., Nef, J. (2007). The Transition from Development Administration to New Public Management: an Interpretative Exploration. In: Managing Development in a Global Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627390_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics