Abstract
The British Prime Minister Tony Blair has recently put in the centre of the debate on European economic policy the question of the place of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) which would represent a too important share of the European budget while, at the same time, almost no support would be given to the research and innovation policy. It would be a policy of the past incapable to face the main issues of the future. Agriculture policy might be renationalised to devote most of the European Union (EU) budget to the policy more turned towards research and innovation. The debate is welcomed but the British position is too simplistic.
Structural policies are not reduced to CAP and innovation policy. Regional policy is a matter of concern, and also are competition policy which plays a dominant role, industrial policy which is almost inexistent at the European level and trade policy which has been at the origin of the European construction but is now inscribed in the WTO framework. A critical assessment of the policies followed in these fields at the European level since the 1980s will be made in Section 2. Alternatives proposals will follow in Section 3, showing how it is possible and necessary to conciliate CAP and innovation policy with other structural interventions. The proposed measures make up a coherent programme.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Allaire and T. Dupeuple (2003), ‘De la multifonctionnalité de l’activité agricole à la multi-évaluation de la production agricole’, Economie Rurale, 275, juin, pp.51–66.
I. Begg (2002), ‘Regional policy in Europe under EMU’, Thematic network EPOC, Workshop Bremen, March.
J.M. Boussard (2003), ‘Commerce, développement et volatilité des prix agricoles’, mimeo, INRA.
J.M. Boussard (1996), ‘When risk generates chaos’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 29 (96/05), pp. 433–446.
M. Burton (1993), ‘Some illustration of chaos in commodity models’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(1), pp. 38–50.
A. Cappelen, J. Fagerberg and B. Verspagen (1999), ‘Lack of regional convergence’ in J. Fagerberg et al. (1999).
J.Y. Carfantan (2002), La mondialisation déloyale (Fayard).
J.P. Cling, E.M. Mouhoud and J. Capdeviel (2003), `Normes sociales: quelles propositions avancer?’ mimeo.
E. Cohen and J.H. Lorenzi (2000), Politiques industrielles pour l’Europe Rapport du Conseil d’Analyse Economique (La Documentation Française).
B. Coriat (2002), ‘Le nouveau régime américain de la propriété intellectuelle’, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 99, 2ème trimestre, pp. 17–32.
P. Cour and L. Nayman (1999), ‘Fonds structurels et disparités régionales en Europe’, Lettre du CEPII, 177 (mars).
European Commission (1993), White book on growth, competitiveness and employment.
European Commission (1994a), Industrial competitiveness policy for the EU.
European Commission (1994b), Industrial policy in an open and competitive environment Communication Bangeman.
European Commission (2002) Cohesion report.
J. Fagerberg, P. Guerrieri and B. Verspagen (1999), The economic challenge for Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar.
L. Fontagné and S. Jean (2003), ‘OMC: bas de cycle’, La lettre du CEPII, 226 (septembre) pp. 1–4.
R. Jennar (2003), ‘Les pièges de l’Accord général sur le commerce et les services’, Oxfam, février Série AGCS, 1, pp. 1–5.
R. Lallement, E.M. Mouhoud and S. Paillard (2002), ‘Polarisation et internationalisation des activités d’innovation: incidences sur la spécialisation technologique des nations, Région et développement, 16, pp. 125–162.
P. Martin (1999), ‘Public policies, regional inequalities and growth’, Journal of Public Economics, 73, pp. 85–105.
T. Pouch (2003), ‘La PAC et 1’OMC: éléments de cadrage’, Université de Marne la Vallée, OEP.
T. Pouch and C. de Lorgeril (2004) ‘La dynamique des échanges de produits agroalimentaires (1967–2000)’, Economie et Sociétés AG, 26, mars, pp. 507–529.
A. Sapir (2003), An agenda for a growing Europe Report to the President of the European Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2006 Jacques Mazier
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mazier, J. (2006). Assessment and Alternative Proposals on European Structural Policies: Why It Is Right to Support both the Common Agricultural Policy and Research and Innovation Policy. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds) Alternative Perspectives on Economic Policies in the European Union. International Papers in Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627352_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627352_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28516-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62735-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)