Skip to main content

The ‘New’ Economic Geography: Where Are We?

  • Chapter
Regional Integration in East Asia

Part of the book series: IDE-JETRO Series ((IDE))

Abstract

Importance is an eigenvector. Really. The search engine Google uses links among websites to rank sites by importance, through a seemingly circular process in which a site’s importance is determined by the number of links it receives from other sites, weighted by their importance. The process bears a strong formal resemblance to the process that generates geographical concentrations of economic activity in some of the models that Masahisa Fujita, Anthony Venables, and I have worked on; in both cases what emerges is the eigenvector with the largest eigenvalue. And anyone who uses Google routinely knows that the eigenvector embodies the truth: Google is almost always right about what is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldwin, R. and P. Martin (1999) ‘Two waves of globalization: Superficial similarities, fundamental differences’, NBER Working Paper No. 6904.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R. and D. E. Weinstein (1999) ‘Economic geography and regional production structure: An empirical investigation’, European Economic Review, 43: 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R. and D. E. Weinstein (2001) ‘Bones, bombs, and break points: The geography of economic activity’, NBER Working paper 8517.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R. and D. E. Weinstein (2003) ‘Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical assessment’, Journal of International Economics, 59 (1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., J. R. Markusen and A. Rose (1998) ‘Understanding the home market effect and the gravity equation: The role of differentiating goods’, NBER Working Paper No. 6804.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G. and C. Xiang (2002) ‘The home market effect and bilateral trade patterns’, NBER Working Paper No. w9076.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. and R. Margo (2003) ‘Historical perspectives on US economic geography’, NBER Working Paper No, 9594.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. and R. Livas-Elizonda (1996) ‘Trade policy and the third world metropolis’, Journal of Development Economics, 49, 137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, P. (2003) ‘After the war boom: Reconversion on the US Pacific Coast’, NBER Working Paper No. 9584.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomiura, E. (2003) ‘Changing economic geography and vertical linkages in Japan’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17, 561–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trionfetti, F. (2001) ‘Using home-biased demand to test trade theories’, Weltwirtscha ftliches Archiv, 137 (3), 404–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krugman, P. (2007). The ‘New’ Economic Geography: Where Are We?. In: Fujita, M. (eds) Regional Integration in East Asia. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626607_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics