Abstract
Importance is an eigenvector. Really. The search engine Google uses links among websites to rank sites by importance, through a seemingly circular process in which a site’s importance is determined by the number of links it receives from other sites, weighted by their importance. The process bears a strong formal resemblance to the process that generates geographical concentrations of economic activity in some of the models that Masahisa Fujita, Anthony Venables, and I have worked on; in both cases what emerges is the eigenvector with the largest eigenvalue. And anyone who uses Google routinely knows that the eigenvector embodies the truth: Google is almost always right about what is important.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baldwin, R. and P. Martin (1999) ‘Two waves of globalization: Superficial similarities, fundamental differences’, NBER Working Paper No. 6904.
Davis, D. R. and D. E. Weinstein (1999) ‘Economic geography and regional production structure: An empirical investigation’, European Economic Review, 43: 379–407.
Davis, D. R. and D. E. Weinstein (2001) ‘Bones, bombs, and break points: The geography of economic activity’, NBER Working paper 8517.
Davis, D. R. and D. E. Weinstein (2003) ‘Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical assessment’, Journal of International Economics, 59 (1), 1–23.
Feenstra, R. C., J. R. Markusen and A. Rose (1998) ‘Understanding the home market effect and the gravity equation: The role of differentiating goods’, NBER Working Paper No. 6804.
Hanson, G. and C. Xiang (2002) ‘The home market effect and bilateral trade patterns’, NBER Working Paper No. w9076.
Kim, S. and R. Margo (2003) ‘Historical perspectives on US economic geography’, NBER Working Paper No, 9594.
Krugman, P. and R. Livas-Elizonda (1996) ‘Trade policy and the third world metropolis’, Journal of Development Economics, 49, 137–50.
Rhode, P. (2003) ‘After the war boom: Reconversion on the US Pacific Coast’, NBER Working Paper No. 9584.
Tomiura, E. (2003) ‘Changing economic geography and vertical linkages in Japan’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17, 561–89.
Trionfetti, F. (2001) ‘Using home-biased demand to test trade theories’, Weltwirtscha ftliches Archiv, 137 (3), 404–26.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krugman, P. (2007). The ‘New’ Economic Geography: Where Are We?. In: Fujita, M. (eds) Regional Integration in East Asia. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626607_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626607_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28522-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62660-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)