Skip to main content
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 4 addresses the relationship between ownership transformation and the establishment of competition. Competition is the driving force of an innovative market economy with private ownership. But privatization — the core of ownership transformation — is a necessary policy to generate a competitive private sector, but it is far from being sufficient. We discuss the problem of the ‘soft’ budget constraint, which prevails in CPEs with state-owned firms and which is a stubborn attendant of transition, when ownership transformation is conducted in a non-competitive way and a non-competitive environment. A taxonomy of privatization presents the various ways in which ownership transformation has been pursued. Finally the difficulties in creating a competitive environment are illustrated with an analysis of anti-trust policy in transition countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and further reading

  • Aghion, P. and W. Carlin (1997) ‘Restructuring outcomes and the evolution of ownership patterns in Central and Eastern Europe’, in S. Zecchini (ed.), Lessons from the Economic Transition: Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 241–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, J., S. Estrin, J. Maw and G. Urga (2003) ‘Does the method of privatisation matter: the case of transition economies’, Centre for New and Emerging Markets, Discussion Paper Series 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, W. and M. Landesmann, ‘From theory into practice? Corporate restructuring and economic dynamisms in transition economies’, WIIW Research Reports 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutz, M. A., Vagliasindi (1999) Competition policy implementation in transition economies: an empirical assessment, EBRD Working Paper No. 47, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (1997) Transition Report 1997 (London: EBRD).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (1999) Transition Report 1999 (London: EBRD).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (2002) Transition Report 2002 (London: EBRD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and M. Angelucci (2003) ‘Ownership, competition and enterprise performance’, Centre for New and Emerging Markets, Discussion Paper Series 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomulka, S. (1985) ‘Komai’s soft budget constraint and the shortage phenomenon: a criticism and restatement’, Economics of Planning 19 (1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guriev, S. and A. Rachinsky (2005) ‘The role of oligarchs in Russian capitalism’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1), 131–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, J. and J. Stephan. (2004) ‘Competition policy in Central East Europe in the light of EU accession’, Journal of Common Market Studies, (2), 321–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungarian Competition Office (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurajda S. and K. Terell (2000) ‘Optimal speed of transition: microevidence from the Czech Republic’, Working Paper 355, University of Michigan Business School, William Davidson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings, J. and H. Vandenbussche (2004) ‘The adjustment of financial ratios in the presence of soft budget constraints: evidence from Bulgaria’, European Accounting Review 13(1), 131–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1985) ‘Gomulka on the soft budget constraint: A Reply’, Economics of Planning 19(2) 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J., E. Maskin and G. Roland (2003) ‘Understanding the soft budget constraint’, Journal of Economic Literature 41(4), 1095–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marroidis, and Neren (2000) The International Dimension of the Antitrust Practice in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, Université de Lausanne, Ecole des HEC, Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Départment d’Economie politique, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. S., R. Frydman, A. Rapaczynski and A. Shleifer (1993) ‘Needed mechanisms of corporate governance and finance in eastern Europe’, Economics of Transition 1, 171–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, M. E. (1998) ‘Do firms in transition economies have soft budget constraints? A reconsideration of concepts and evidence’, Journal of Comparative Economics 26, 80–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2003) ‘Competition, corporate governance and selection in emerging markets’, Economic Journal 113, 443–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2000) ‘Whither reform? Ten years of transition’, in B. Pleskovic and J. E. Stiglitz (eds), Annual World Bank Conference on Economic Development (Washington, DC: World Bank), 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Hubert Gabrisch and Jens Hölscher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabrisch, H., Hölscher, J. (2006). Privatization and Competition. In: The Successes and Failures of Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626584_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics