Advertisement

Two Competing Concepts of Transition

  • Hubert Gabrisch
  • Jens Hölscher

Abstract

Chapter 2 presents two different intellectual concepts of transition. On the surface, these concepts were initially identified with the debate about ‘shock-therapy versus gradualism’. However, the differences were deeper and rooted in different schools of economic thought. Behind the shock approach we find the so-called ‘Washington Consensus’, which dominated economic policy in transition countries for many years. This approach is based on liberalization, privatization and stabilization as cornerstones of the transition to a market economy. The contributors to this approach shared a deep belief in flexible prices, market transactions, and a minimalist state. The approach is contrasted with the ‘evolutionary-institutionalist’ concept, which emphasizes the role of informal institutions such as behavior and mindsets as well as formal institutions such as the rule of law. This approach takes into account that institution building is a time-consuming process, in particular when some institutions such as those of the financial sector within the transition countries have to be created from scratch.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Central Bank Money Supply Economic Transition Excess Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and further reading

  1. Amsden, A., J. Kochanowicz and L. Taylor (1994) The Market Meets its Match: Restructuring the Economies of Eastern Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (2000) ‘Economic transition: speed and scope,’ Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 156, 9–18.Google Scholar
  3. Balcerowicz, L. (1995) Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation (Budapest, London, and New York: Central European University Press (1997).Google Scholar
  4. Balcerowicz, L. (1997) ‘The interplay between economic and political transition’, in Salvatore Zecchini (ed.), Lessons from the Economic Transition: Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhaduri, A. (1992) ‘Conventional stabilization and the East European transition’, in Sandor Richter (ed.), The Transition from Command to Market Economies in East-Central Europe (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), 13–51.Google Scholar
  6. Bhaduri, A. (1994) ‘Patterns of economic transition and structural adjustments’, WIIW-Working Papers 2.Google Scholar
  7. Borenstein, E. R. and J. D. Ostry (1992) ‘Structural and macroeconomic determinants of the output decline in Poland: 1990–91’, IMF Working Paper 92/86.Google Scholar
  8. Djankov, S., E. Glaeser, R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer (2003) ‘The new comparative economics’, Journal of Comparative Economics 31, 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eichengreen, B. and R. Hausman (1999) ‘Exchange rates and financial fragility’, NBER Working Paper 7418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabrisch, H. and K. Laski (1990) ‘Transition from the command to a market economy’, WIIW-Research Report 163 (Vienna: The Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies).Google Scholar
  11. Kiguel, M. A. and N. Liviatan (1992) ‘When do heterodox stabilization programs work? Lessons from Experience’, World Bank Research Observer 7, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein, P. G. (1999) ‘New institutional economics’, in B. Bouckaert, G. Boudewijn and De Geest Gervit (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Northampton, MA: Edgar Elgar), vol. I, 456–489.Google Scholar
  13. Kregel, J. E. Matzner and G. Drabher (eds) (1992) The Market Shock: An Agenda for the Economic and Social Reconstruction of Central and Eastern Europe (Vienna: Austrian Academy of Science).Google Scholar
  14. Krueger, A. O. ‘The political economy of the rent-seeking society’, American Economic Review 64, 291–303.Google Scholar
  15. Laski, K. and A. Bhaduri (1997) ‘Lessons to be drawn from main mistakes in the transition strategy’, in S. Zecchini (ed.), Lessons from the Economic Transition: Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lipton, D. and J. Sachs (1990) ‘Creating a market economy in eastern Europe: the case of Poland’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1990/1, 75–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mencinger, J. (2004) ‘Transition to a national and a market economy: a gradualist approach’, in M., Mrak, M. Rojec and C. Silva-Jáuregui (eds), Slovenia: From Yugoslavia to the European Union (Washington, DC: World Bank), 67–83.Google Scholar
  18. Mickiewicz, T. (2005) Economic Transition in Central Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (Basingstoke: Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitra, P., and N. Stem (2002) ‘Tax systems in transition’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2947.Google Scholar
  20. Murrell, Peter (1993) ‘Evolutionary and radical approaches to economic reform’, in K. Z. Poznanski (ed.), Stabilization and Privatization in Poland (Boston, Dordrecht, and London: Kluwer Academic Press), 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. North, D. C. (2003) ‘Understanding the process of economic change’, Forum Series on the Role of Institutions in Promoting Economic Growth (Washington, DC: Mercatus Center at George Mason University).Google Scholar
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1999). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (Paris).Google Scholar
  23. Phelps, E. S., R. Frydman, A. Rapaczynski and A. Shleifer (1993) ‘Needed mechanisms of corporate governance and finance in Eastern Europe’, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Working Paper 1, 3.Google Scholar
  24. Polak, J. J. (1957). ‘Monetary analysis of income formation and payment problems’, IMF Staff Papers 6, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon Schuster).Google Scholar
  26. Riese, H. (1992) ‘Transformationsprozeß und Stabilisierungspolitik’, in B. Gahlen, H. Hesse and J. J. Ramser (eds), Von der Plan- zur Marktwirtschaft. Eine Zwischenbilanz (Tübingen: Mohr), 129–42.Google Scholar
  27. Rodrik, D. (2001) ‘The global governance of trade as if development really mattered’ (New York: UNDP), available at http://www.servicesforall.org/html/Governance/Rodrik-Trade%20&%20Development.pdf (6 July 2005).Google Scholar
  28. Roland, G. (2001) ‘Ten years after … transition and economics’, IMF Staff Papers 48, Special Issue.Google Scholar
  29. Sinn, G. and H.-W. Sinn (1994) Jumpstart: The Economic Unification of Germany (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  30. Williamson, J. (1990) What Washington Means by Policy Reform in Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics).Google Scholar
  31. Williamson, J. (2000) ‘What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus?’, World Bank Research Observer 15, 251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. World Bank (1999) ‘What is social capital?’, PovertyNet (Washington, DC: World Bank); available at http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/whatsc.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hubert Gabrisch and Jens Hölscher 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hubert Gabrisch
  • Jens Hölscher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations