Abstract
The ‘Muslim community’ in India emerged during colonial rule as a new kind of sociological category. This emergence was linked to the designs and exigencies of British rule, including the deployment from the early years of the nineteenth century of new forms of classification like the census, which for the first time defined India’s Muslims as a minority. More interesting, however, was the way in which the colonial state provided Muslims the opportunity to redefine themselves as a group. In this chapter, I will argue that rather than being territorialized by British rule as a demographic or religious minority, Muslims adopted forms of selfdefinition that ended up deterritorializing both India and Islam. They did so by abandoning the idea of territorial nationality, which defined them as second-class subjects in a state where they were unfree instead of free, a minority instead of a majority. What resulted from this abandonment of territoriality was a Muslim community that occupied an imagined space situated at an angle to the sovereignty of the state. Like a shadow, this community was spread by the territorial notion of nationality, while at the same time being quite distinct from it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
S.A. Khan, ‘Taqrir Mutalluq Qawmi Ta’alim, Qawmi Hamdardi, awr Bahami Itifaq’, in S. Panipati (ed.), Khutbat-e Sir Sayyid, vol. 1 (Lahore, 1972), p. 403.
M. Dara Shukuh, in T. Chand and S. Naini (eds), Sirr-i Akbar (Tehran, 1957), pp. 3–6.
A.H. Hali, ‘Musaddas dar Madd-o Jazr-e Islam’, in Kulliyat-e Nazm-e Hali, vol. 2 (Lahore, 1970), pp. 5–45.
S.A. Khan, ‘Taqrir Bajawab Address-e Anjuman-e Islamiyya Rae Bareilly’, in Panipati (ed.), Khutbat-e Sir Sayyid, vol. 1 (Lahore, 1972), p. 365.
Abu’l-Fazl Allami, in Blochmann (trans), The A’in-i Akbari (Delhi, 1965), p. 2.
W.W. Hunter, The Indian Mussulmans: Are They Bound in Conscience to Rebel Against the Queen? (Delhi, 1969).
S.A. Khan, ‘Ta’alim awr Itifaq’, in Panipati (ed.), Maqalat-e Sir Sayyid, vol. 12 (Lahore, 1963), p. 161.
B. Cohn, ‘The Census, Social Structure and Objectification in South Asia’, in An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays (New Delhi, 1990), pp. 224–54.
M.A. Khan, Majmuah-e Lectures-o Speeches, vol. 1 (Lahore, 1904), p. 33.
C.F. Andrews, Zaka Ullah of Delhi (Cambridge, 1929), p. 111.
A.H. Hali, ‘Shikwa-e Hind’, in Kulliyat-e Nazm-e Hali, vol. 2 (Lahore, 1970), p. 182.
M. Heidegger, ‘The Word of Nietzche: God is Dead’, in W. Lovitt (trans), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York, 1977), p. 71.
S.A. Khan, in Panipati (ed.), Maqalat-e Sir Sayyid, vol. 15 (Lahore, 1963), pp. 41–2.
M. Foucault, ‘Other Spaces: The Principles of Heterotopia’, Lotus International Quarterly Architectural Review, 48/49 (1986), pp. 9–17.
S.M. Ikram, Ab-e Kawsar (Lahore, 1990), p. 235.
Y. Lacoste, Paysages Politiques (Paris, 1990).
N. Ahmad, Banat un-Na’ash (Lucknow, 1967), pp. 185–6.
M. Iqbal, ‘Islam as a Moral and Political Ideal’, in L. Sherwani (ed.), Speeches, Writings, and Statements of Iqbal (Lahore, 1977), p. 104.
M. Iqbal, ‘Javed Namah’, in Kulliyat-e Iqbal Farsi (Lahore, 1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Faisal Devji
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Devji, F. (2007). A shadow nation: The making of Muslim India. In: Grant, K., Levine, P., Trentmann, F. (eds) Beyond sovereignty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626522_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626522_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54089-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62652-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)