Skip to main content

Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates: A Cross-Section Approach

  • Chapter
Advances in Risk Management

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

Since 1998, regulatory guiding principles have required banks with significant trading activity to set aside capital to insure against extreme portfolio losses. The size of the market risk capital requirement is directly related to a measure of portfolio risk. Currently, in the regulatory framework, portfolio risk is measured in terms of its Value-at-Risk (VaR). Also in the community of asset management companies the quest for reliable risk management techniques has grown in recent years. The concept of VaR is now widespread among asset managers. This is an answer to the demand of sophisticated investors, such as pension funds and foundations, and it is also a clear response to the growing interest of asset managers for analytical tools that give better control on their portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berkowitz, J. (2001) “Testing Density Forecasts with Application to Risk Management”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19 (4): 465–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S.D. (2005) “A Review of Backtesting Procedures”, Finance and Economic Discussion Series (Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (1993) “Calculating Interval Forecasts”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11 (2): 121–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P. (1998) “Evaluating Interval Forecasts”, International Economic Review, 39 (4): 841–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crnkovic, C. and Drachman, J. (1997) Quality Control, in VaR: Understanding and Applying Value at Risk (London, UK: Risk Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F.X., Gunther, T.A. and Tay, A.S. (1998) “Evaluating Density Forecasts”, International Economic Review, 39: 863–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2001) Value at Risk (Chicago, IL: Irw in Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiec, P. (1995) “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Management Models”, Journal of Derivatives, 3: 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, J.A. (1999) “Methods for Evaluating Value at Risk Estimates”, FRBSF Economic Review, 2 (4): 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Raffaele Zenti, Massimiliano Pallotta and Claudio Marsala

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zenti, R., Pallotta, M., Marsala, C. (2007). Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates: A Cross-Section Approach. In: Gregoriou, G.N. (eds) Advances in Risk Management. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625846_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics