Abstract
The history of the victim demonstrates the gradual removal of the victim from common law processes, in particular, their empowered position as private prosecutor. This is evidenced by the steady rise of precedents that focus on the power of the King, state, public prosecutors and defendants, over that of the victim. In many cases, it is not the victim that was expressly excluded, but simply replaced as the subject bringing charges on indictment. This provided the basis upon which, from around 1600, the victim increasingly lacked prosecutorial agency, to be seen around the mid-twentieth century as little more than a witness, or basis for the charge of the defendant’s offensive conduct against society. The impact of various institutions, namely the rise of parliamentary sovereignty independent of the political will of the King, the decline in feudalism, and the expansion of the social as the key arena of government, each explain why victim power was transferred to the state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Tyrone Kirchengast
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirchengast, T. (2006). The Erosion of the Victim and the Rise of State Power from 1600. In: The Victim in Criminal Law and Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625778_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625778_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54055-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62577-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)