Skip to main content
  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

Not all that many people are all that interested in politics. It is true that there has been a decline in electoral turnouts over recent years, but it has always been the case that a minority corresponded to the Aristotelian and J.S. Mill model of the active citizen. The majority of citizens occupy the private sphere — concerning themselves with their families, their jobs, their other interests and so on — rather than participating extensively in the public sphere of collective action. Not many people are interested in the European Union (EU) either. That is partly because it is distant; partly because it is difficult to understand and partly because it is not very interesting a lot of the time. A glance at the language and acronyms associated with it — incomprehensible to the majority — helps explain a lack of popular enthusiasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Schmitter, P. (2001), ‘What is there to legitimize in the European Union… and how might this be accomplished?’ (contribution to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 6/01 Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wind, M. (2001), ‘The Commission White Paper: Bridging the gap between the governed and the governing?’ (contribution to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 6/01 Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kant, I. ([1797–1798]1996), ‘Public Right, Section I: The Right of a State’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Scharpf summarises arguments from commentators such as Majone in his paper: Scharpf, F. (2003), ‘Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU’ (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies; MPIfG Working Paper 03/1).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lord, C. and Magnette, P. (2004), ‘Creative disagreement about legitimacy in the EU’ (Journal of Common Market Studies 42:1), p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marks, G. Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996), ‘European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v Multi-level Governance’ (Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 3), p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Janet Mather

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mather, J. (2006). Introduction. In: Legitimating the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625624_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics