Skip to main content

Subjective Measures of Well-being

  • Chapter
Human Well-Being

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

There are two approaches in social indicators research: the ‘objective’ and the ‘subjective’ approach. In the objective approach the focus is on measuring ‘hard’ facts, such as income in dollars or living accommodation in square metres. The subjective approach, in contrast, considers ‘soft’ matters, such as satisfaction with income and perceived adequacy of dwellings. The objective approach has its roots in the tradition of social statistics, which dates back to the nineteenth century. The subjective approach stems from survey research, which took off in the 1960s. The objective approach is similar to mainstream economic indicators research; though the topics differ, the method is the same. The subjective approach is akin to the psychological stream found in economic indicators research, which is used to monitor things such as consumer trust (Katona 1975) and subjective poverty (VanPraag et al. 1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 145.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allardt, E. (1976) ‘Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study’, Acta Sociologica, 19: 227–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. and S. Withey (1976) Social Indicators of Well-being: American Perceptions of Quality of Life (New York: Plenum Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asia barometer (n.d.): http://avatoli.ioc.u-tpkyo.ac.jp/~asiabarometer/

  • Campbell, A., P. E. Converse and W. L. Rodgers (1975) The Quality of American Life (Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K. and S. Zika (1988) ‘Measuring Meaning of Life, Examination of Three Scales’, Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 9: 589–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. (1984) The Social Progress of Nations (New York: Preager).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey (ESS) (n.d.): http://ess.nsd.uib.no

  • Flax, M. J. (1972) A Study in Comparative Urban Indicators (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1999) Luxury Fever. Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, E. M. (1976) ‘On Quality of Life’, American Sociological Review, 41: 793–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer, W. and W. Zapf (1984) Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik [Quality of Life in West Germany] (Frankfurt am Main: Campus) [English summary in Social Indicators Research (1987) 19: 1–1711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., R. A. Cummins, A. L. Ferriss, K. Land, A. Michalos, M. Peterson, A. Sharpe, J. Sirgy and J. Vogel (2001) ‘Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research’, Social Indicators Research, 55: 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. and A. Wearing (1988) ‘The Sense of Relative Superiority: Central to Wellbeing’, Social Indicators Research, 20: 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1958) Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health (New York: Basic Books).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanahan, D., E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds) (1999) Well-being, the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G. (1975) Psychological Economics (Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (2000) The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latino barometro (n.d.): http://www.latinobarometro.org

  • Lynn, R. (1971) Personality and National Character (London: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1982) ‘National Differences in Anxiety and Extraversion’, Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 11: 213–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangahas, M. (1998) Self-Sustained Quality of Life Monitoring: The Philippine Social Weather Reports, Occasional Report (Social Weather Station: Philippines).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naroll, R. (1984) The Moral Order (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugarten, B. L., R. J. Havighurst and S. S. Tobin (1961) ‘The Measurement of Life Satisfaction’, Journal of Gerontology, 16: 134–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999) Social Indicators: A Proposed Framework and Structure (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, R. (1997) Quality of Life in Britain, Quality of Life Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999) ‘Reports of Subjective Well-Being: Judgmental Processes and Their Methodological Implications’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation) 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993) ‘Capability and Well-being’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press for UNU-WIDER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slottje, D. J. (1991) ‘Measuring the Quality of Life across Countries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73: 684–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C., L. H. Kendall and C. L. Hulin (1969) The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement (Chicago: Rand-McNally).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1999) Human Development Report 1999 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press for the United Nations Development Programme).

    Google Scholar 

  • VanPraag, B. M. (1993) ‘The Relativity of the Well-being Concept’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press for UNU-WIDER) 362–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • VanPraag, B. M., Th. Goedhart and A. Kapteyn (1980) ‘The Poverty Line: A Pilot Survey in Europe’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63: 461–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1993) ‘Happiness in Nations: Subjective Appreciation of Life in 56 Nations 1946–1992’, RISBO, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Studies in Social and Cultural Transformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996a) ‘Developments in Satisfaction Research’, Social Indicators Research, 36: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996b) ‘Happy Life-expectancy. A Comprehensive Measure of Qualityof-Life in Nations’, Social Indicators Research, 39: 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1997) ‘Progrès dans la compréhension du bonheur’, Revue Québécoise de psychologie, 18: 29–74. [English version available at: www.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub1990s/1997c-txte.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000) ‘The Four Qualities of Life’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 1: 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2002) ‘Why Social Policy needs Subjective Indicators’, Social Indicators Research, 58: 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004) ‘Happiness as a Public Policy Aim: The Greatest Happiness Principle’, in A. Linley and S. Joseph (eds), Positive Psychology in Practice (Chichester: Wiley) 658–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2005a) ‘Return of Inequality in Modern Society? Test by Dispersion of Life-satisfaction across Time and Nations’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 6: 457–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2005b) ‘Happiness in Hardship’, in L. Bruni and P. Porta (eds) Economics and Happiness (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 243–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. and W. M. Kalmijn (2005) ‘Inequality-Adjusted Happiness in Nations: Egalitarianism and Utilitarianism Married in a New Index of Societal Performance’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 6: 421–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vile, M. J. C. (1999) Politics in the USA (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. (2002) ‘Strategies and Traditions in Swedish Social Reporting: A 30-year Experience’, Social Indicators Research, 58: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P., J. Cook and T. Wall (1979) ‘Scales for the Measurement of Social Work Attitudes and Aspects of Psychological’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52: 129–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1998) ‘Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOLBREF Quality of Life Assessment’, Psychological Medicine, 28: 551–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Database of Happiness (n.d.) Continuous register of research on subjective appreciation of life, Version 2005, Erasmus University Rotterdam, http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl

  • World Values Survey (n.d.) ICPRS file 6160, Ann Arbor, MI: World Values Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2002) Living Planet Report (WWF: Gland, Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective Measures of Well-being. In: McGillivray, M. (eds) Human Well-Being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics