Abstract
There are two approaches in social indicators research: the ‘objective’ and the ‘subjective’ approach. In the objective approach the focus is on measuring ‘hard’ facts, such as income in dollars or living accommodation in square metres. The subjective approach, in contrast, considers ‘soft’ matters, such as satisfaction with income and perceived adequacy of dwellings. The objective approach has its roots in the tradition of social statistics, which dates back to the nineteenth century. The subjective approach stems from survey research, which took off in the 1960s. The objective approach is similar to mainstream economic indicators research; though the topics differ, the method is the same. The subjective approach is akin to the psychological stream found in economic indicators research, which is used to monitor things such as consumer trust (Katona 1975) and subjective poverty (VanPraag et al. 1980).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allardt, E. (1976) ‘Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study’, Acta Sociologica, 19: 227–39.
Andrews, F. and S. Withey (1976) Social Indicators of Well-being: American Perceptions of Quality of Life (New York: Plenum Press).
Asia barometer (n.d.): http://avatoli.ioc.u-tpkyo.ac.jp/~asiabarometer/
Campbell, A., P. E. Converse and W. L. Rodgers (1975) The Quality of American Life (Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research).
Chamberlain, K. and S. Zika (1988) ‘Measuring Meaning of Life, Examination of Three Scales’, Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 9: 589–96.
Estes, R. (1984) The Social Progress of Nations (New York: Preager).
European Social Survey (ESS) (n.d.): http://ess.nsd.uib.no
Flax, M. J. (1972) A Study in Comparative Urban Indicators (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute).
Frank, R. H. (1999) Luxury Fever. Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess (New York: Free Press).
Gerson, E. M. (1976) ‘On Quality of Life’, American Sociological Review, 41: 793–806.
Glatzer, W. and W. Zapf (1984) Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik [Quality of Life in West Germany] (Frankfurt am Main: Campus) [English summary in Social Indicators Research (1987) 19: 1–1711.
Hagerty, M. R., R. A. Cummins, A. L. Ferriss, K. Land, A. Michalos, M. Peterson, A. Sharpe, J. Sirgy and J. Vogel (2001) ‘Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research’, Social Indicators Research, 55: 1–96.
Headey, B. and A. Wearing (1988) ‘The Sense of Relative Superiority: Central to Wellbeing’, Social Indicators Research, 20: 497–516.
Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Jahoda, M. (1958) Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health (New York: Basic Books).
Kanahan, D., E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds) (1999) Well-being, the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
Katona, G. (1975) Psychological Economics (Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishers).
Lane, R. E. (2000) The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Latino barometro (n.d.): http://www.latinobarometro.org
Lynn, R. (1971) Personality and National Character (London: Pergamon Press).
Lynn, R. (1982) ‘National Differences in Anxiety and Extraversion’, Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 11: 213–58.
Mangahas, M. (1998) Self-Sustained Quality of Life Monitoring: The Philippine Social Weather Reports, Occasional Report (Social Weather Station: Philippines).
Naroll, R. (1984) The Moral Order (London: Sage).
Neugarten, B. L., R. J. Havighurst and S. S. Tobin (1961) ‘The Measurement of Life Satisfaction’, Journal of Gerontology, 16: 134–43.
OECD (1999) Social Indicators: A Proposed Framework and Structure (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).
Rogerson, R. (1997) Quality of Life in Britain, Quality of Life Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Strathclyde.
Schwarz, N. (1999) ‘Reports of Subjective Well-Being: Judgmental Processes and Their Methodological Implications’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation) 61–84.
Sen, A. (1993) ‘Capability and Well-being’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press for UNU-WIDER).
Slottje, D. J. (1991) ‘Measuring the Quality of Life across Countries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73: 684–93.
Smith, P. C., L. H. Kendall and C. L. Hulin (1969) The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement (Chicago: Rand-McNally).
UNDP (1999) Human Development Report 1999 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press for the United Nations Development Programme).
VanPraag, B. M. (1993) ‘The Relativity of the Well-being Concept’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press for UNU-WIDER) 362–85.
VanPraag, B. M., Th. Goedhart and A. Kapteyn (1980) ‘The Poverty Line: A Pilot Survey in Europe’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63: 461–5.
Veenhoven, R. (1993) ‘Happiness in Nations: Subjective Appreciation of Life in 56 Nations 1946–1992’, RISBO, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Studies in Social and Cultural Transformation.
Veenhoven, R. (1996a) ‘Developments in Satisfaction Research’, Social Indicators Research, 36: 1–46.
Veenhoven, R. (1996b) ‘Happy Life-expectancy. A Comprehensive Measure of Qualityof-Life in Nations’, Social Indicators Research, 39: 1–58.
Veenhoven, R. (1997) ‘Progrès dans la compréhension du bonheur’, Revue Québécoise de psychologie, 18: 29–74. [English version available at: www.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub1990s/1997c-txte.pdf]
Veenhoven, R. (2000) ‘The Four Qualities of Life’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 1: 1–39.
Veenhoven, R. (2002) ‘Why Social Policy needs Subjective Indicators’, Social Indicators Research, 58: 33–45.
Veenhoven, R. (2004) ‘Happiness as a Public Policy Aim: The Greatest Happiness Principle’, in A. Linley and S. Joseph (eds), Positive Psychology in Practice (Chichester: Wiley) 658–78
Veenhoven, R. (2005a) ‘Return of Inequality in Modern Society? Test by Dispersion of Life-satisfaction across Time and Nations’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 6: 457–87.
Veenhoven, R. (2005b) ‘Happiness in Hardship’, in L. Bruni and P. Porta (eds) Economics and Happiness (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 243–66.
Veenhoven, R. and W. M. Kalmijn (2005) ‘Inequality-Adjusted Happiness in Nations: Egalitarianism and Utilitarianism Married in a New Index of Societal Performance’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 6: 421–55.
Vile, M. J. C. (1999) Politics in the USA (New York: Routledge).
Vogel, J. (2002) ‘Strategies and Traditions in Swedish Social Reporting: A 30-year Experience’, Social Indicators Research, 58: 1–3.
Warr, P., J. Cook and T. Wall (1979) ‘Scales for the Measurement of Social Work Attitudes and Aspects of Psychological’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52: 129–48.
WHOQOL Group (1998) ‘Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOLBREF Quality of Life Assessment’, Psychological Medicine, 28: 551–8.
World Database of Happiness (n.d.) Continuous register of research on subjective appreciation of life, Version 2005, Erasmus University Rotterdam, http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl
World Values Survey (n.d.) ICPRS file 6160, Ann Arbor, MI: World Values Survey.
WWF (2002) Living Planet Report (WWF: Gland, Switzerland).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 United Nations University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective Measures of Well-being. In: McGillivray, M. (eds) Human Well-Being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28183-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62560-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)