Skip to main content

Sustainability and Well-being Indicators

  • Chapter
Human Well-Being

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

Most indicators of well-being ignore sustainability and most indicators of sustainability ignore (current) well-being. A prominent example for the former is the United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Index (hereafter UNDP and HDI), whereas the World Bank’s Genuine Savings (GS) is characteristic of the latter. This chapter provides a critical assessment of those efforts, which have tried to integrate both concepts into one single indicator or have combined the measurement of both without full integration. Well-being often comes under the name welfare or utility, and we will use all three terms interchangeably here. In spite of its common use in economics and other social sciences, it is not easily defined in a concrete sense. Other chapters of this book discuss the meaning of well-being and how best to measure it in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 145.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anand, S. and A. Sen (2000) ‘Human Development and Economic Sustainability’, World Development, 28: 2029–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., P. Dasgupta and K.-G. Mäler (2003) ‘The Genuine Savings Criterion and the Value of Population’, Economic Theory, 21: 217–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G. B. (2002) ‘Green National Accounting with a Changing Population’, Working Paper (Oslo: University of Oslo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. (1995) Measuring Sustainable Economic Welfare: A Critique of the UK ISEW, Working Paper GEC 95–08 (Norwich and London: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, B. E. (1999) ‘An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for Chile’, Ecological Economics, 28: 231–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. and S. M. N. Islam (2003) Diminishing and Negative Returns of Economic Growth: An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for Thailand, Mimeo (Melbourne: Victoria University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. W. and J. B. Cobb (eds) (1994) The Green National Product: A Proposed Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (Lanham: University Press of America).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities-Eurostat, International Monetary Fund, Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations and World Bank (1993) System of National Accounts 1993 (Brussels; Luxembourg; New York; Paris; Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N. (2002) ‘UK Real National Income, 1950–1998: Some Grounds for Optimism’, National Institute Economic Review, 181 (1): 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahme, K., F. Hinterberger, H. Schütz, and E. K. Seifert (1998) Sustainable Human Development Index: A Suggestion for ‘Greening’ the UN’s Indicator, Mimeo (Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H., H. E. Cobb and J. B. Cobb (1989) For the Common Good (Boston: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2001a) Human Well-being and the Natural Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2001b) ‘Valuing Objects and Evaluating Policies in Imperfect Economies’, Economic Journal, 111: C1 - C29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Vega, M. C. L. and Urrutia, A. M. (2001) ‘HDPI: A Framework for Pollution-Sensitive Human Development Indicators’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 3: 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. (1995) ‘Greening of the HDI?’, in A. MacGillivray (ed.), Accounting for Change (London: New Economics Foundation) 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbacher, H. (1994) ‘The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare: A Case Study of the Federal Republic of Germany’, in C. W. Cobb and J. B. Cobb (eds), The Green National Product: A Proposed Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (Lanham: University Press of America) 215–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, R. (1988) ‘Extended Accounts for National Income and Product’, Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1611–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, R. (1990) The Total Incomes System of Accounts (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • El Serafy, S. (1981) ‘Absorptive Capacity, the Demand for Revenue, and the Supply of Petroleum’, Journal of Energy and Development, 7: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Serafy, S. (1989) ‘The Proper Calculation of Income from Depletable Natural Resources’, in Y. J. Ahmad, S. El Serafy, and E. Lutz (eds), Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development: a UNDP-World Bank Symposium (Washington, DC: World Bank) 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenno, G. and S. Tiezzi (1998) ‘An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Italy’, Working Paper 5/98 (Milano: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., R. A. Cummins, A. L. Ferriss, K. Land, A. C. Michalos, M. Peterson, A. Sharpe, J. Sirgy and J. Vogel (2001) ‘Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research’, Social Indicators Research, 55: 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (1999) ‘The Genuine Progress Indicator: Methodological Developments and Results from Australia’, Ecological Economics, 30: 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (1994) ‘Green Adjustments to GDP’, Resources Policy, 20: 155–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (1996) ‘Pollution and Pollution Abatement in the National Accounts’, Review of Income and Wealth, 42 (1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (2000) ‘Sustaining Economic Welfare — Estimating Changes in Per Capita Wealth’, Policy Research Working Paper 2498 (Washington DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. A. (1997) ‘The Inequality-Adjusted Human Development Index: A Constructive Proposal’, World Development, 25: 1283–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T., F. Laing, A. MacGillivray, N. Marks, J. Rails and S. Stymne (1997) An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for the UK 1950–1996 (Guildford: University of Surrey Centre for Environmental Strategy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. and S. Stymne (1996) Sustainable Economic Welfare in Sweden: A Pilot Index 1950–1992 (Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785) [1968] Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Werke Band XI. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. (1995) ‘Economic Growth and Quality of Life: A Threshold Hypothesis’, Ecological Economics, 15: 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. and H. White (1993) ‘Measuring Development? The UNDP’s Human Development Index’, Journal of International Development, 5: 183–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt, I. and M. C. Wilson (1994) ‘An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Scotland, 1980–1991’, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 1: 264–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (1999) ‘The ISEW: Not an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare’, Social Indicators Research, 48: 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2000a) ‘On the Methodology of ISEW, GPI and Related Measures: Some Constructive Suggestions and Some Doubt on the “Threshold” Hypothesis’, Ecological Economics, 34: 347–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2000b) ‘In Defence of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, Ecological Economics, 33: 185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2001) ‘The Human Development Index and Sustainability — A Constructive Proposal’, Ecological Economics, 39: 101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003) Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, 2nd rev. edn (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2004) ‘Indicators of Sustainability’, in T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer (eds), International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/05 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998a) ‘A Modified Human Development Index’, World Development, 26: 517–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998b) ‘The Human Development Index: Some Technical Issues and Alternative Indices’, Journal of International Development, 10: 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1992) Is Growth Sustainable? Reflections on the Concept of Sustainable Economic Growth, Paper prepared for the International Economic Association Conference, Varenna, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. and J. Tobin (1972) ‘Is Growth Obsolete?’, in National Bureau of Economic Research, Economic Growth, Research General Series 96F (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L. and A. Sharpe (2002a) ‘An Index of Economic Well-Being for Selected OECD Countries’, Review of Income and Wealth, 48: 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L. and A. Sharpe (2002b), ‘International Comparisons of Trends in Economic Well-Being’, Social Indicators Research, 58: 349–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey, J. C. V. and M. A. Toman (2002) ‘Progress and Problems in the Economics of Sustainability’, in T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer (eds), International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2002/2003 (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar) 165–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work — Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash, M. (2001) ‘Sustainable Development: Concepts and Rankings’, Journal of Development Studies, 37: 134–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, B. (1999) ‘Environment Sensitive Human Development Index: Issues and Alternatives’, Indian Social Science Review, 1: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Redefining Progress (2001) The 2000 Genuine Progress Indicator (San Francisco: Redefining Progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D., P. Oegema and M. Bovy (1995) ISEW for the Netherlands: Preliminary Results and some Proposals for Further Research (Amsterdam: IMSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, A. and A. Najam (1996) Sustainable Human Development: A Zero-Sum Game?, Mimeo (Cambridge, MA: Boston University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, A. D. and A. Najam (1998) ‘The Human Development Index: A Critical Review’, Ecological Economics, 25: 249–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Hebbel, K. and L. Servén (2000) ‘Does Income Inequality Raise Aggregate Saving?’, Journal of Development Economics, 61: 417–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2001) ‘International Evidence on How Income Inequality and Credit Market Imperfections Affect Private Saving Rates’, Journal of Development Economics, 64: 103–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, E., H. Hochreiter, B. Obermayr and K. Steiner (1997) ‘The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) as an Alternative to GDP in Measuring GDP in Measuring Economic Welfare. The Results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW Calculation 1955–1992’, Ecological Economics, 21: 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (various years) Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1997) ‘Sustainability and Technical Progress’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004) ‘Green Accounting and Adjusted Net Savings’, website: http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/ESSD/envext.nsf/44ByDocName/GreenAccounting Adjusted Net Savings.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006) Where is the Wealth of Nations? (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolotas, X. (1981) Economic Growth and Declining Social Welfare (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neumayer, E. (2007). Sustainability and Well-being Indicators. In: McGillivray, M. (eds) Human Well-Being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics