Abstract
International comparisons of living standards or development are most commonly made in terms of gross domestic product per person — whether in newspaper articles examining the latest country rankings or in economics journals analyzing the relative performance of countries. Such comparisons are open to criticism on the grounds that GDP is more properly regarded as a partial measure of aggregate output than as an indicator of either current or future well-being. International GDP comparisons make no allowance for environmental differences, for resource depletion, for leisure, for household production of goods and services, for black market activities or for external costs and benefits associated with production and consumption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, K. G. (2003) ‘Toward a Cost-of-Living Index: Progress and Prospects’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1): 45–58.
Afriat, S. N. (1973) ‘On a System of Inequalities in Demand Analysis: An Extension of the Classical Method’, International Economic Review, 14 (2): 460–72.
Afriat, S. N. (1981) ‘On the Constructability of Consistent Price Indices between Several Periods Simultaneously’, in A. Deaton (ed.), Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Behaviour (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 133–61.
Balassa, B. (1964) ‘The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal’, Journal of Political Economy, 72 (6): 584–96.
Castles, I. (1992) ‘Living Standards in Sydney and Japanese Cities: A Comparison’, in K. Sheridan (ed.), The Australian Economy in the Japanese Mirror (Brisbane: University of Queensland Press).
Dowrick, S. and M. Akmal (2003) ‘Explaining Contradictory Trends in Global Income Inequality: A Tale of Two Biases’, Draft paper for World Institute for Development Economics Research on ‘Inequality, Poverty and Human Well-being’, May, http://ecocomm.anu.edu.au/economics/staff/dowrick/dowrick.html
Dowrick, S. and G. Bruton (2000) ‘Quantifying Substitution Bias: True Comparisons across Countries’, 4th Biennial Conference of the Pacific Rim Allied Economic Organizations, Sydney (13 January).
Dowrick, S., Y. Dunlop and J. Quiggin (2003) ‘Social Indicators and Comparisons of Living Standards’, Journal of Development Economics, 70 (2): 501–29.
Dowrick, S. and J. Quiggin (1994) ‘International Comparisons of Living Standards and Tastes: A Revealed-Preference Analysis’, American Economic Review, 84 (1): 332–41.
Dowrick, S. and J. Quiggin (1997) ‘True Measures of GDP and Convergence’, American Economic Review, 87 (1): 41–64.
Dowrick, S. and J. Quiggin (1998) ‘Measures of Economic Activity and Welfare: The Uses and Abuses of GDP’, in R. Eckersley (ed.), Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? (Collingwood, VA: CSIRO) 93–107.
Eisner, R. (1988) ‘Extended Accounts for National Income and Product’, Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (4): 1611–84.
Folbre, N. (2002) ‘Valuing Parental Time: New Estimates of Expenditures on Children in the United States’, Meeting of the Allied Social Science Association, Draft paper (28/12/01): 1–23.
Folbre, N. and J. A. Nelson (2000) ‘For Love or Money — or Both?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (4): 123–40.
Hausman, J. (2003) ‘Sources of Bias and Solutions to Bias in the Consumer Price Index’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1): 23–44.
Hill, R. J. (2000) ‘Measuring Substitution Bias in International Comparisons Based on Additive Purchasing Power Parity Methods’, European Economic Review, 44 (1): 145–62.
Kravis, I. B., A. Heston and R. Summers (1982) World Product and Income: International Comparisons of Real Gross Products (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Samuelson, P. (1984) ‘Second Thoughts on Analytical Income Comparisons’, Economic Journal, 94 (June): 267–78.
Schultze, C. L. (2003) ‘The Consumer Price Index: Conceptual Issues and Practical Suggestions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1): 3–22.
Summers, R. and A. Heston (1991) ‘The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2): 327–68.
United Nations and Commission of the European Communities (UN and CEC) (1987) World Comparisons of Purchasing Power and Real Product for 1980 (New York: UN).
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1990–2003), Human Development Reports (New York: Oxford University Press).
Varian, H. R. (1983), ‘Non-Parametric Tests of Consumer Behaviour’, Review of Economic Studies, 50 (1): 99–110.
White, K. J. (1987) ‘A General Computer Program for Econometric Methods — Shazam’, Econometrica, 46 (1): 239–40.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 United Nations University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dowrick, S. (2007). Income-based Measures of Average Well-being. In: McGillivray, M. (eds) Human Well-Being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28183-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62560-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)