Advertisement

Participatory Approaches and the Measurement of Human Well-being

  • Sarah White
  • Jethro Pettit
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Development Economics and Policy book series (SDEP)

Abstract

‘We are all democrats now,’ wrote John Dunn ironically in his 1979 review of Western Political Theory (Dunn 1979). Twenty-five years on, the democratic ethic of people centred governance has acquired the status of a sacred totem that commands obeisance far beyond the arena of formal politics. Rites and symbolic acts of participation have accordingly been ‘mainstreamed’ across a remarkable range of institutions, from neighbourhood school boards to multilateral agencies. Though very different in their form and practice, the promise is similar. Incorporating participation will mean that processes of policy making, administration and research become more inclusive, more responsive, more equitable, and so represent more fully the interests of ‘the people’ they claim to serve.

Keywords

Participatory Research Participatory Method Poor People Participatory Approach Participatory Rural Appraisal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barahona, C. and S. Levy (2003) ‘How to Generate Statistics and Influence Policy Using Participatory Methods in Research: Reflections on Work in Malawi 1999–2002’, IDS Working Paper 212 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  2. Bevan, P., K. Kebede and A. Pankhurst (2003) ‘A Report on a Very Informal Pilot of the Person Generated Index© of Quality of Life in Ethiopia’, Mimeo (Bath: WeD, University of Bath).Google Scholar
  3. Booth, D., J. Holland, J. Hentschel, P. Lanjouw and A. Herbert (1998) ‘Participation and Combined Methods in African Poverty Assessment: Renewing the Agenda’ (London: Social Development Division, DFID).Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock, K. (1999) ‘It’s not only Wealth that Matters — It’s Peace of Mind Too: A Review of Participatory Work on Poverty and Ill-being’, Study prepared for the World Development Report 2000/01 (Washington, DC: PREM, World Bank).Google Scholar
  6. Brock, K. and R. McGee (eds) (2002) Knowing Poverty: Critical Reflections on Participatory Research and Policy (London: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  7. Burkey, S. (1993) People First: A Guide to Self-Reliant, Participatory Rural Development (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  8. Calman, K. C. (1984) ‘Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Hypothesis’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 10: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camfield, L. and S. Skevington (2003) ‘Quality of Life and Well-being’, WeD Working Paper (Bath: WeD, University of Bath).Google Scholar
  10. Chambers, R. (1997) Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last (London: Intermediate Technology Development Group Publishing).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers, R. (2002) ‘The World Development Report: Concepts, Content and a Chapter12’, Journal of International Development, 13: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chambers, R. (2003) ‘Participation and Numbers’, PLA Notes 47 (London: International Institute for Environment and Development).Google Scholar
  13. Christiansen, L. (2002) ‘The Qual-Quant Debate within its Epistemological Context: Some Practical Implications’, in R. Kanbur (ed.), Q-Squared: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Poverty Appraisal (Delhi: Permanent Black).Google Scholar
  14. Cooke, B. and U. Kothari (eds) (2001) Participation: the New Tyranny? (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  15. Cornwall, A. (2000) ‘Beneficiary, Consumer, Citizen: Perspectives on Participation for Poverty Reduction’, Mimeo (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  16. Cornwall, A. and G. Pratt (2002) ‘Pathways to Participation: Critical Reflections on PRA’, Summary Report (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  17. Cornwall, A. and G. Pratt (eds) (2003) Pathways to Participation: Reflections on PRA (London: Intermediate Technology Development Group Publications).Google Scholar
  18. Cornwall, A., S. Musyoki and G. Pratt (2001) ‘In Search of a New Impetus: Practitioners’ Reflections on PRA and Participation in Kenya’, IDS Working Paper 131 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  19. Cummins, R. A. (1996) ‘The Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos’, Social Indicators Research, (38): 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Das, V. (2000) ‘The Act of Witnessing: Violence, Poisonous Knowledge, and Subjectivity’, in V. Das, A. Kleinman, M. Ramphele and P. Reynolds (eds), Violence and Subjectivity (Berkeley/Oxford: University of California Press) 205–41.Google Scholar
  21. Davies, J., M. Richards and W. Cavendish (1999) ‘Beyond the Limits of PRA? A Comparison of Participatory and Conventional Economic Research Methods in the Analysis of Ilala Palm Use in South-Eastern Zimbabwe’, Working Paper (London: ODI).Google Scholar
  22. Doyal, L. and I. Gough (1991) A Theory of Human Need (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn, J. (1979) Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Seabury Press).Google Scholar
  25. Garcia, X. M. and S.-A. Way (2003) ‘Winning Spaces: Participatory Methodologies in Rural Processes in Mexico’, IDS Working Paper 180 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  26. Geertz, C. (1988) Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author (Oxford: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A. (1977) Studies in Social and Political Theory (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
  28. Gujit, I. and M. K. Shah (eds) (1998) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development (London: Intermediate Technology Publications).Google Scholar
  29. Hagerty, M. R., R. A. Cummins, A. Ferriss, K. Land, A. C. Michalos, M. Peterson, A. Sharpe, J. Sirgy and J. Vogel (2001) ‘Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research’, Social Indicators Research, 55: 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hargreaves, J., L. A. Morison, J. S. S. Gear, J. D. H. Porter, M. B. Makhubele, J. C. Kim, J. Busza, C. Watts and P. M. Pronyk (2004) ‘Hearing the Voices of the Poor: Assigning Poverty Lines on the basis of Local Perceptions of Poverty; A Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data from Participatory Wealth Ranking in Rural South Africa’, Unpublished manuscript (London: London School of Health and Tropical Medicine; and Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand, Rural Aids and Action Research Programme (RADAR).Google Scholar
  31. Holland, J. and S. Abeyesekera (eds) (forthcoming) Who Counts? (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  32. IDS (1996) ‘The Power of Participation: PRA and Policy’, IDS Policy Briefing 7 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, S. (2004) ‘Gender Norms in Financial Markets: Evidence from Kenya’, World Development, 32 (8).Google Scholar
  34. Jordan, J. (1989) ‘Report from the Bahamas’, in J. Jordan (ed.), Moving Towards Home: Political Essays (London: Virago) 137–46.Google Scholar
  35. Jupp, D. (2002) ‘Views of the Poor: Some Thoughts on How to Involve Your Own Staff to Conduct Quick, Low Cost but Insightful Research into Poor People’s Perspectives’, Unpublished manuscript (UK: DIPM).Google Scholar
  36. Kanbur, R. (ed.) (2002) Q-Squared: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Poverty Appraisal (Delhi: Permanent Black).Google Scholar
  37. Knorr-Celina K. and M. Mulkay (eds) (1993) Science Observed (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  38. Laderchi, C. R. (2001) ‘Participatory Methods in the Analysis of Poverty: A Critical Review’, QEH Working Paper Series 62 (Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
  39. McGee, R. (2000) ‘Analysis of Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and Households Survey Findings on Poverty Trends in Uganda’, Mission Report 10–18 February, Mimeo (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  40. McGee, R. and A. Norton (2000) ‘Participation in Poverty Reduction Strategies: A Synthesis of Experience with Participatory Approaches to Policy Design, Implementation and Monitoring’, IDS Working Paper 109 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  41. McGregor, J. A. and B. Kebede (2003) ‘Resource Profiles and the Social and Cultural Construction of Well-being’, WeD Working Paper (Bath: WeD, University of Bath).Google Scholar
  42. Michalos, A. C. (1997) ‘Combining Social, Economic and Environmental Indicators to Measure Sustainable Human Well-being’, Social Indicators Research, 40: 221–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell, T. (1990) ‘Everyday Metaphors of Power’, Theory and Society, 19 (5): 545–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Narayan, D., R. Chambers, M. K. Shah and P. Petesch (1999) Global Synthesis: Consultations with the Poor (Washington, DC: World Bank).Google Scholar
  45. Narayan, D., R. Chambers, M. K. Shah and P. Petesch (2000) Voices of the Poor: Crying out for Change (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norton, A., with B. Bird, K. Brock, M. Kakande and C. Turk (2001) ‘A Rough Guide to PPAs: Participatory Poverty Assessment: An Introduction to Theory and Practice’ (London: ODI).Google Scholar
  47. Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pretty, J., I. Gujit, J. Thompson and I. Scoones (1995) ‘Participatory Learning and Action: A Trainer’s Guide’ (London: International Institute for Environment and Development).Google Scholar
  49. Robb, C. (1999) ‘Can the Poor Influence Policy? Participatory Poverty Assessments in the Developing World’ (Washington, DC: World Bank).Google Scholar
  50. Ruta, D. A. (1998) ‘Patient Generated Assessment: The Next Generation’, MAPI Quality of Life Newsletter, 20: 461–89.Google Scholar
  51. Ruta, D. A., A. M. Garratt, M. Lengm, I. T. Russell and L. M. Macdonald (1994) ‘A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient-generated Index’, Medical Care, 11 (1): 109–26.Google Scholar
  52. Scoones, I., J. Pretty, I. Gujit and J. Thompson (1995) ‘Participatory Learning and Action: A Trainers’ Guide, Sustainable Agriculture Programme’ (London: International Institute for Environment and Development).Google Scholar
  53. Selznick, P. (1949/53) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  54. Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  55. Simanowitz, A. (1999) Pushing the Limits of Mapping and Wealth Ranking’, Participatory Learning and Action Notes 34 (London: International Institute for Environment and Development).Google Scholar
  56. Simanowitz, A. (2000) ‘Targeting the Poor: A Comparison between Visual and Participatory Methods’, Small Enterprise Development: an International Journal, 11(1): March.Google Scholar
  57. Townsend, P. (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
  58. Turbyne, J. (1992) Participation and Development’, Mimeo (Bath: University of Bath).Google Scholar
  59. Veenhoven R. (2000) ‘Freedom and Happiness: A Comparative Study in Forty Four Nations in the early 1990s’, in E. Diener and E. M. Suh (eds), Culture and Subjective Well-being (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  60. Weldon, J. (2002) ‘Planning Participatory Fixes’, China Development Brief 5(3): Winter, available at: www.chinadevelopmentbrief.com
  61. White, S. C. (1992) Arguing with the Crocodile: Gender and Class in Bangladesh (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  62. White, S. C. and R. Tiongco (1997) Doing Theology and Development: Meeting the Challenge of Poverty (Edinburgh: Saint Andrew Press).Google Scholar
  63. Wood, G. (ed.) (1985) Labelling in Development Policy (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  64. World Bank (2000) Poverty and Development: The World Development Report 2000–2001: Attacking Poverty (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© United Nations University 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah White
  • Jethro Pettit

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations