Abstract
In this chapter, we make an experimental investigation of the role of context dependence in the individual assessment of incomes. Suppose, for example, you had to assign 14 equally spaced incomes to seven categories ranging from ‘very bad’ to ‘excellent’. As the incomes are equally spaced, it is very likely that you would assign two neighbouring incomes in increasing order to the respective categories. However, this picture would change dramatically if the very same incomes (stimuli) were embedded in sets of additional background incomes, which serve to create different income distributions. The background context would cause you to rate the same income stimulus higher if there were only a few higher incomes in the respective income distribution. The same income stimulus would be rated lower if there were many incomes greater than the considered income in the respective income distribution. Thus, income categorization and, a fortiori, income satisfaction, depend on the background context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beckman, S.R., J.P. Formby, W.J. Smith and B. Zheng (2002) ‘Envy, Malice and Pareto Efficiency: An Experimental Examination’, Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 349–67.
Birnbaum, M.H. (1973) ‘Morality Judgement: Test of an Averaging Model with Differential Weights’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395–9.
Birnbaum, M.H. (1974a) ‘Using Contextual Effects to Derive Psychophysical Scales’, Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 89–96.
Birnbaum, M.H. (1974b) ‘The Nonadditivity of Personality Impressions’, Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 102, 543–61.
Birnbaum, M.H. (1992) ‘Violations of Monotonicity and Contextual Effects in Choice-Based Certainty Equivalents’, Psychological Science, 3, 310–14.
Birnbaum, M.H., A. Parducci and R.K. Gifford (1971) ‘Contextual Effects in Information Integration’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 158–70.
Camacho-Cuena, E., C. Seidl and A. Morone (2005) ‘Comparing Preference Reversal of General Lotteries and Income Distributions’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 682–710.
Devooght, K. (2002) ‘Measuring Inequality by Counting “Complaints”: Theory and Empirics’, Discussion Paper no. DARP 59 (London: STICERD, London School of Economics).
Glaeser, E.L. and B. Sacerdote (2000) ‘The Determinants of Punishment: Deterrence, Incapacitation and Vengeance’, Discussion Paper no. 1894 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute of Economic Research).
Green, D., K.E. Jacowitz, D. Kahneman and D. McFadden (1995) ‘Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willingness to Pay for Public Goods’, Dept. of Economics (Berkely: University of California).
Harris, R.J. (1976) ‘Handling Negative Inputs: On the Plausible Equity Formulae’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 194–209.
Harris, R.J. (1980) ‘Equity Judgements in Hypothetical, Four-Person Partnerships’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 96–115.
Harris, R.J. (1993) ‘Two Insights Occasioned by Attempts to Pin Down the Equity Formula’, in B.A. Meilers and J. Baron (eds), Psychological Perspectives on Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 32–54.
Helson, H. (1947) ‘Adaption-Level as Frame of Reference for Prediction of Psychophysical Data’, American Journal of Psychology, 60, 1–29.
Hunt, W.A. and J. Volkmann (1937) ‘The Anchoring of an Affective Scale’, American Journal of Psychology, 49, 88–92.
Jacowitz, K.E. and D. Kahneman (1995) ‘Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161–6.
Kapteyn, A. and F.G. van Herwaarden (1980) ‘Independent Welfare Functions and Optimal Income Distribution’, Journal of Public Economics, 14, 375–97.
Luce, R.D. and E. Galanter (1963) ‘Psychophysical Scaling’, in R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush and E. Galanter (eds), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. I (New York: Wiley) 245–307.
McGarvey, H.R. (1942/43) ‘Anchoring Effects in the Absolute Judgement of Verbal Materials’, Archive of Psychology, 39, 1–86.
Meilers, B.A. (1982) ‘Equity Judgement: A Revision of Aristotelian Views’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 242–70.
Meilers, B.A. (1986) ‘“Fair” Allocations of Salaries and Taxes’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 80–91.
Meilers, B.A. and M.H. Birnbaum (1982) ‘Loci of Contextual Effects in Judgement’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 582–601.
Northcraft, G.B. and M.A. Neale (1987) ‘Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring-and-Adjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84–97.
Parducci, A. (1965) ‘Category Judgement: A Range-Frequency Model’, Psychological Review, 72, 407–18.
Parducci, A. (1968) ‘The Relativism of Absolute Judgements’, Scientific American, 219/6, 84–90.
Parducci, A. (1974) ‘Contextual Effects: A Range-Frequency Analysis’, in E.C. Carterette and P. Friedman (eds), Handbook of Perception, Vol. II: Psychological Judgement and Measurement (New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press) 127–41.
Parducci, A. (1982) ‘Category Ratings: Still More Contextual Effects!’, in B. Wegener (ed.), Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement (Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 88–105.
Parducci, A., R.C. Calfee, L.M. Marshall and L.P. Davidson (1960) ‘Context Effects in Judgement: Adaptation Level as a Function of the Mean, Midpoint, and Median of the Stimuli’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 65–77.
Parducci, A. and L.F. Perrett (1971) ‘Category Rating Scales: Effects of Relative Spacing and Frequency of Stimulus Values’, Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 89, 427–52.
Quattrone, G.A., C.P. Lawrence, S.E. Finkel and D.C. Andrus (1984) ‘Explorations in Anchoring: The Effects of Prior Range, Anchor Extremity, and Suggestive Hints’, Working Paper (Stanford, CA: Stanford University).
Rogers, S. (1941) ‘The Anchoring of Absolute Judgements’, Archive of Psychology, 37.
Runciman, W.G. (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice (Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Seidl, C. (1994) ‘How Sensible is the Leyden Individual Welfare Function of Income?’, European Economic Review, 38, 1633–59.
Seidl, C. (2002) ‘Preference Reversal’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 16, 621–55.
Stouffer, S.A., E.A. Suckman, L.C. Devinney, S.A. Star and R.M. Williams (1949) The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life, 1 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Temkin, L.S. (1986) ‘Inequality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15, 99–121.
Temkin, L.S. (1993) Inequality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Tversky, A. (1974) ‘Assessing Uncertainty’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 148–67.
Tversky, A. and D. Griffin (1991) ‘Endowment and Contrast in Judgments of Well-Being’, in F. Strack, M. Argyle and N. Schwarz (eds). Subjective Weil-Being (Oxford: Pergamon Press) 101–18.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974) ‘Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biased’, Science, 185, 1124–31.
van Herwaarden, F.G. and A. Kapteyn (1981) ‘Empirical Comparisons of the Shape of Welfare Functions’, European Economic Review, 15, 261–8.
van Herwaarden, F.G., A. Kapteyn and B.M.S. van Praag (1977) ‘Twelve Thousand Individual Welfare Functions, A Comparison of Six Samples in Belgium and the Netherlands’, European Economic Review, 9, 283–300.
van Praag, B.M.S. (1968) Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behavior (Amsterdam: North Holland).
van Praag, B.M.S. (1971) ‘The Welfare Functions of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation’, European Economic Review, 2, 337–69.
van Praag, B.M.S. and Kapteyn, A. (1973) ‘Further Evidence on the Individual Welfare Functions of Income: An Empirical Investigation in the Netherlands’, European Economic Review, 4, 33–62.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 United Nations University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seidl, C., Traub, S., Morone, A. (2006). Relative Deprivation, Personal Income Satisfaction and Average Well-being under Different Income Distributions: An Experimental Investigation. In: McGillivray, M. (eds) Inequality, Poverty and Well-being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625594_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625594_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54154-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62559-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)