Advertisement

Regional Planning

  • Glen O’Hara

Abstract

If both industry and the public sector itself were perceived to require re-organisation, Britain’s ‘depressed areas’ were seen as another and central part of Britain’s economic problems. These regions — particularly South Wales, Central Scotland, North East England and Merseyside — had long suffered from a number of economic handicaps. They were hundreds of miles from the new industrial heartlands and markets of the Midlands and South East England. All suffered from specialising in the manufacturing industries of the industrial revolution, for instance coal and shipbuilding.1 Between the two World Wars, they experienced chronically high levels of unemployment, which rose to between 19 and 25 per cent in the early 1930s. Some small areas endured catastrophically high levels of joblessness of up to 90 per cent in the worst cases.2

Keywords

Regional Policy Development Area Central Direction Regional Unemployment Growth Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    S. Glynn and J. Oxborrow, Interwar Britain: A Social and Economic History (1976), pp. 152–4.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    J. Glasson, An Introduction to Regional Planning (2nd edn., 1978), p. 210.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    A.J. Odber, ‘Regional Policy in Great Britain’, in US Department of Commerce, Area Redevelopment Policies in Britain and the Countries of the Common Market (Washington DC, 1965), pp. 335–6.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    A. Booth, ‘The Second World War and the Origins of Modern Regional Policy’, Economy and Society 11 (1982), pp. 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 9.
    G. Cherry, Town Planning in Britain Since 1900 (Oxford, 1996), pp. 121–4.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    D.H. McKay and A.W. Cox, The Politics of Urban Change (1979), pp. 199–200.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    D.W. Parsons, The Political Economy of British Regional Policy (1986), pp. 105–8.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    P. Scott, ‘The Worst of Both Worlds: British Regional Policy 1951–64’, Business History 38 (1996), pp. 41, 49, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 13.
    H.W. Armstrong, ‘Regional Problems and Policies’, in N. Crafts and N.W.C. Woodward (eds), The British Economy Since 1945 (Oxford, 1991), pp. 302–3.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    F. Perroux, ‘Economic Space: Theory and Applications’, in J. Friedmann and W. Alonso (eds), Regional Development and Planning (Cambridge, Mass., 1964), pp. 23–8.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    M.D. Thomas, ‘Growth Pole Theory: An Examination of Some of its Basic Concepts’, in N.M. Hansen (ed.), Growth Centres in Regional Economic Development (New York, 1972), pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    L.H. Klaasen, Area Economic and Social Redevelopment (Paris, 1965), p. 77.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    N. Kaldor, ‘The Case for Regional Policies’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 17 (1970), p. 343;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Kaldor, Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom (Cambridge, 1966).Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    D. North, ‘Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 63 (1955), pp. 247–8, 257;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. W.W. Rostow, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge, 1960), pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
  17. 22.
    M. Blaug, ‘A Case of Emperor’s Clothes: Perroux’s Theory of Economic Domination’, Kyklos 17 (1964), p. 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 23.
    See J.B. Parr, ‘Growth Pole Strategies in Regional Economic Planning: A Retrospective View, Part II, Implementation and Outcome’, Urban Studies 36 (1999), p. 1250.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    S.R. Dennison, The Location of Industry and the Depressed Areas (Oxford, 1939), pp. 201–2.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    J.A. Schumpeter, Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (New York, 1939), esp. p. 86.Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    Scottish Council, Report of the Committee on Local Development in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1952), pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    M. Chisholm, ‘On the Making of a Myth? How Capital Intensive is Industry Investing in the Development Areas?’, Urban Studies 7 (1970), pp. 289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 30.
    D. Linehan, ‘Regional Survey and the Economic Geographies of Modern Britain 1930–1939’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 28 (2003), pp. 96–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 31.
    B. Balassa, The Theory of Economic Integration (Homewood, Ill., 1961), p. 209.Google Scholar
  25. 32.
    E.T. Nevin, A. Roe and J.I. Round, The Structure of the Welsh Economy (Cardiff, 1966), pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    A.J. Brown, J.K. Bowers, P. Cheshire, H. Lind and V.H. Woodward, ‘Regional Problems and Regional Policy’, National Institute Economic Review 46 (1968), pp. 43–5.Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    A.J. Brown, ‘Surveys of Applied Economics: Regional Economics, With Special Reference to the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal 79 (1969), pp. 772–3.Google Scholar
  28. 36.
    E.T. Balopoulos, Fiscal Policy Models of the British Economy (Amsterdam, 1967), pp. 168–83, 259–66.Google Scholar
  29. 43.
    G. Cherry and U. Wannop, ‘The Development of Regional Planning in the UK’, Planning Perspectives 9 (1994), p. 40.Google Scholar
  30. 53.
    N.M. Hansen, French Regional Planning (Bloomington, Indiana, 1968), pp. 83–5.Google Scholar
  31. 56.
    C. Clifford, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Department of Economic Affairs, 1964–69: British Government and Indicative Planning’, Contemporary British History 11 (1997), pp. 101–2.Google Scholar
  32. 91.
    D. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1964 (1965), pp. 315–16.Google Scholar
  33. 93.
    J. Tomlinson, ‘Conservative Modernisation, 1960–64: Too Little, Too Late?’, Contemporary British History 11 (1997), pp. 20–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 97.
    Scottish Council, Development and Industry: Report of Inquiry into the Scottish Economy (Edinburgh, 1961), pp. 161–3, 178.Google Scholar
  35. 102.
    M. Aldridge, The British New Towns: A Programme Without a Policy (1979), pp. 62–3.Google Scholar
  36. 115.
    D. McKie, ‘By-Elections of the Wilson Government’, in C. Cook and J. Ramsden (eds), By-Elections in British Politics (1997), pp. 223–63.Google Scholar
  37. G. Hallett et al., Regional Policy For Ever? Essays on the History, Theory and Political Economy of Forty Years of ‘Regionalism’ (1973), pp. 30–2.Google Scholar
  38. 166.
    B. Ashcroft and J. Taylor, ‘The Effect of Regional Policy on the Movement of Industry in Great Britain’, in D. Maclennan and P.B. Parr (eds), Regional Policy: Past Experience and New Directions (1979), pp. 42–54, 60–1; table 7. 5, p. 146.Google Scholar
  39. 169.
    S. Fothergill and G. Gudgin, Unequal Growth: Urban and Regional Employment Change in the UK (1982), pp. 51–61, 69–71.Google Scholar
  40. 170.
    V. Nichols, ‘Growth Poles: An Evaluation of their Propulsive Effect’, Environment and Planning 1 (1969), p. 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 171.
    M. Chisholm, ‘Regional Policies in an Era of Slow Population Growth and Higher Unemployment’, Regional Studies 10 (1976), pp. 202–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 172.
    R. Dennis, ‘The Decline of Manufacturing Employment in Greater London 1966–74’, Urban Studies 15 (1978), pp. 72–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 174.
    D. Keeble, Industrial Location and Planning in the United Kingdom (1976), pp. 217–20, 236–9.Google Scholar
  44. 176.
    M. Chisholm and J. Oeppen, The Changing Pattern of Employment: Regional Specialisation and Industrial Localisation in Britain (1973), pp. 74–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Glen O’Hara 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen O’Hara
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford Brookes UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations