Skip to main content

The Adult-worker-model Family and Gender Equality: Principles to Enable the Valuing and Sharing of Care

  • Chapter
Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context

Part of the book series: Social Policy in a Development Context ((SPDC))

Abstract

There is now agreement in the literature that the male-breadwinner-model family, in which men took primary responsibility for earning and women for the unpaid work of care, has been substantially eroded (Crompton 1999; Lewis 2001a). There is also substantial agreement that the actual patterns of family formation and dissolution and labour-market participation have changed, but there has been, if anything, a more rapid shift still in normative ideas about the contributions that women especially should make to families, and in the goals of social and labour-market policies. There is of course substantial variation between countries in the degree of change in social trends, policy assumptions and policy development. But given the steady (and in some countries dramatic) rise in female labour-market participation together with large-scale family change, which has resulted in a rapid increase in lone-mother and single-person households, policy-makers may feel justified in making assumptions regarding increasing individualization, in the sense of increasing self-sufficiency. However, parttime employment for women is extremely common in most Northern and Western European countries, which alone is sufficient to undermine any such simple assumption. How care work is to be accommodated in this new model is also a major issue, but one that has often been subordinated to economic and labour-market concerns and hence has received only partial acknowledgement in policymaking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Balbo, L. (1987) ‘Crazy Quilts: Rethinking the Welfare State Debate from a Woman’s Point of View’. In A. Showstack Sasson (ed.) Women and the State. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, A. and S. Duncan (2000) ‘New Labour’s Communitarianism: Supporting Families and the “Rationality Mistake”, Part II’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 22(2): 129–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and L. F. Lopez-Calva (1999) ‘Functionings and Capabilities’. In K. Arrow, A. Sen and K. Suzumura (eds) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2002) Individualization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojer, H. (2002) The Social Contract: Unpaid Child Care And Women’s Economic Capability. Paper presented at the VHI conference ‘Promoting Women’s Capabilities: Examining Nussabum’s Capabilities Approach’, Cambridge, 9–10 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J. and N. Farvaque (2003) Towards a Capability-Friendly Social Policy: The Role of Local Implementation Agencies. Paper prepared for the VHI conference ‘Transforming Unjust Structures: Capabilities and Justice’, Cambridge, 26–27 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H. (1989) Men’s Work Women’s Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., S. Kennedy, M. Kilkey, S. Hutton, A. Corden, T. Eardly, H. Holmes and J. Neale (1996) The Employment of Lone Parents. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1993) Growth, Competitiveness and Employment — The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21stCentury. Luxembourg: CEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. (ed.) (1999) Restructuring Gender Relationships and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (2001) ‘Alternative Ways of Compensating for Care in Western Europe’. In M. Daly (ed.), Care Work Security. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. and R. Edwards (1999) Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck and J. Myles (2001) A New Welfare Architecture for Europe? Report submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, Final Version.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck and J. Myles (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (1996) ‘Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC’. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2000) Social Policy Agenda. COM (2000) 379 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2002a) Increasing Labour Force Participation and Promoting Active Ageing. COM (2002) 9 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2002b) Taking Stock of Five Years of the European Employment Strategy. COM (2002) 416 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2003) Scoreboard on Implementing the Social Policy Agenda. COM (2003) 57 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and Council of the European Union (2002) Joint Report on Employment, at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/employment_strategy/report_2002/jer2002_final_en.pdf/comm/employment_social/employment_strategy/report_2002/jer2002_final_en.pdf, accessed on 9 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M., A. Hemerijck and M. Rhodes (2000) The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy. Report for the Portuguese presidency of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. and D. Groves (eds) (1983) A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. and J. Mason (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1995) ‘“Holding Hands at Midnight”: The Paradox of Caring Labour’. Feminist Economics, 1(1): 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. and J. Nelson (2000) ‘For Love or Money — Or Both?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4): 123–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Post-Socialist’ Condition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2000) Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Post-industrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, C. and J. Millar (1987) Women and Poverty. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (2001) ‘Work and Welfare: Towards a Post-productivist Welfare Regime’. British Journal of Political Science, 31(1): 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J. C., M. K. Meyers and K. E. Ross (1997) ‘Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation across Fourteen Welfare States’. Journal of European Social Policy, 7(1): 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the Twenty-first Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L. (ed.) (2000) Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1993) Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, V. (2003) ‘Intra-Household Inequality: A Challenge for the Capability Approach?’ Feminist Economics, 9(2–3): 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson J. and M. Sineau (eds) (2001) Women’s Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, F-X. (2002) ‘Politics and Policies Towards the Family in Europe: A Framework and an Inquiry into their Differences and Convergences’. In F-X Kaufman, A. Kuilsten, H-J Schulze, K. P. Strohmeier (eds) Family Life and Family Policies in Europe, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. (1999) Love’s Labour: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, M. (2002) A European Welfare State? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, H. (2002) ‘Spheres of Care in the UK: Separate and Equal’. Critical Social Policy, 22(1): 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1997) ‘Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts’. Social Politics, 4: 160–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2001a) ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: The Implications for Work and Care’. Social Politics, 8(2): 152–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2001b) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. and B. Meredith (1987) Daughters who Care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1997) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2003) Citizenship: FeministPerspectives. 2nd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lödemel, I. and H. Trickey (eds) (2001) An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E. and C. Glendinning (1993) Paying forCare—Lessons from Europe. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, L. (1986) Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. and A. Warman (1996) Family Obligations in Europe. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, J. and F. Akins (1998) ‘The Welfare State and Women: Structure, Agency, and Diversity’. Social Politics 5: 259–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1993) Independent Lives. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. A. (1996) Feminism, Objectivity and Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1999) Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003) ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice’. Feminist Economics 9(2–3): 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. and A. Sen (eds) (1993) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981) Subject Women. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (2003) ‘Measuring Progress in the European Social Model: Policy Coordination, Social Indicators and the Social Policy Agenda in the European Union’. Paper presented at the RC19 Conference, Toronto, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1989) Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, A. (2002) ‘Explaining US Welfare Reform: Power, Gender, Race and the US Policy Legacy’. Critical Social Policy, 22(1): 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. and R. F. Bales (1995) Family Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press (first published 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, F. (2003) ‘Gender and the Foundations of Social Choice: The Role of Situated Agency’. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3) 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1993) Democracy and Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (2001) ‘Feminism and Liberalism Revisited: Has Martha Nussbaum Got It Right?’. Constellations, 8(2): 249–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2000) ‘An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen’s Capability Approach Re-examined’. Paper presented at the Workshop on Poverty, Social Capital and Development, St Edmunds College, 23 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2001) ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and Feminist Concerns’. Paper prepared for the conference on Sen’s Capability Approach, St Edmunds College, 5–7 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2003) ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities’. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3): 61–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. (2001) ‘Europe: An Actor without a Role’. In J. Jenson and M. Sineau (eds) Women’s Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J., M. Smith and C. Fagan (1998) ‘National Working-Time Regimes and Equal Opportunities’. Feminist Economics, 4(1): 71–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2002) ‘The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4): 645–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985) ‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4): 169–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1990) ‘Gender and Cooperative Conflicts’. In I. Tinker (ed.) Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siim, B. (2000) Gender and Citizenship: Politics and Agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. B. and C. Smart (1999) The New Family? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart C. and B. Neale (1999) Family Fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, A. (ed.) (1999) Au-dela de L’Emploi (Beyond Employment). Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for and Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerson, C. (1997) ‘Social Politics and the Commodification of Care’. Social Politics, 4: 362–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerson, C. (2000) ‘Thinking About the Production and Consumption of Long-Term Care in Britain: Does Gender Still Matter?’ Journal of Social Policy, 29(4): 623–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroucke, F. (2001) ‘European Social Democracy and the Third Way: Convergence, Divisions, and Shared Questions’. In S. White (ed.) New Labour: The Progressive Future? Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. (2001) ‘In and Beyond New Labour: Towards a New Political Ethics of Care’. Critical Social Policy, 21(4): 467–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F., J. Popay and A. Oakley (1999) Welfare Research: A Critical Review. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1989) ‘Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship’. Ethics, 99: 250–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 UNRISD

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, J., Giullari, S. (2006). The Adult-worker-model Family and Gender Equality: Principles to Enable the Valuing and Sharing of Care. In: Razavi, S., Hassim, S. (eds) Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context. Social Policy in a Development Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625280_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics