Abstract
The concept of collectivity is a cornerstone of much politically engaged social research. Yet, its political relevance is now virtually invisible to some, hence Jameson’s (2000) call for a new conceptualization of collectivity. Here, we consider the tension between critiques of collectivity as a politically potent tool for social research and emerging ways of understanding what collectivity and collaborative action are now becoming. Like that of other concepts, the value of the concept of collectivity hinges, not on the degree to which it reflects universal truths of existence, but on its capacity to make ‘the future different from the past by affording new forms of description, thought and action’ (Patton, 2000, p. 133).
[I]n a historical moment in which individual personal identity has been unmasked as a decentred locus of multiple subject positions, surely it is not too much to ask that something analogous be conceptualised on the collective level. (Jameson, 2000, p. 68)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2006 Niamh Stephenson and Dimitris Papadopoulos
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stephenson, N., Papadopoulos, D. (2006). Rethinking Collectivity. In: Analysing Everyday Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624993_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624993_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51800-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62499-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)