Abstract
One of the earliest professionally-trained Marxist historians to be associated with the Russian revolutionary movement, M.N. Pokrovsky was enormously influential as a teacher, pedagogue and scholar. He was also a prominent administrator, serving as Deputy Commissar of the Enlightenment and head of the Communist Academy and Institute of the Red Professors from 1918 until his career was cut short by cancer in 1932. That said, his reputation outlived him by only four years before coming under a withering official assault in the days and weeks after 27 January, 1936. Much of the literature on the Stalinist state’s suppression of the so-called ‘Pokrovsky school’ contends that this campaign was the inevitable outcome of a ‘Great Retreat’ on the historical front that had been foreshadowed in party and state decrees since the early 1930s.1 Archival evidence, however, indicates that the shift caught many on the ground by surprise. A.V. Shestakov, one of the most prominent court historians of the Stalin period, was bombarded at public lectures during the late 1930s by questions from audience members struggling to understand the regime’s break with the materialist internationalism that Pokrovsky had popularised during the first 15 years of Soviet power.2 Some, recalling Lenin’s endorsement of the academician’s seminal Russian History in its Most Condensed Form.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nicholas Timasheff, The Great Retreat (New York, 1946), pp. 252–3
John Barber, Soviet Historians in Crisis, 1928–1932 (London, 1981), p. 139.
James D. White, ‘The Origins, Development and Demise of M.N. Pokrovsky’s Interpretation of Russian History’ in Ian D. Thatcher (ed.), Late Imperial Russia: Problems and Prospects (Manchester, 2005), pp. 168–88.
I. Tonkin, ‘O bol’shevistskoi partiinosti istoricheskoi nauki’, Bor’ba klassov, 9–10, 1932, pp. 38–70.
George M. Enteen, The Soviet Scholar-Bureaucrat: M.N. Pokrovsky and the Society of Marxist Historians (University Park, 1978), pp. 188–9.
A. Fokht, ‘O rabote nad uchebnikom po istorii’, Istoriya v srednei shkole, 1, 1934, pp. 23–31.
Aleksei Litvin, Bez prava na mysl’: istorik v epokhu Bol’shogo terrora – ocherk sudeb (Kazan, 1994), p. 57.
M.N. Pokrovsky, Russkaya istoriya v samom szhatom ocherke, 2 vols (Moscow, 1934)
David Brandenberger, National Bolshevism: Stalinist Mass Culture and the Formation of Modern Russian National Identity, 1931–1956 (Cambridge, 2002), pp. 251–5, appendix.
A.M. Dubrovskii, ‘A.A. Zhdanov v rabote nad shkol’nym uchebnikom istorii’ in Otechestvennaya kul’tura i istoricheskaya nauka XVIII–XX vekov: Sbornik statei (Bryansk, 1996), pp. 128–43
A.M. Dubrovskii, ‘Veskii uchebnik’ i arkhivnye materialy’, Arkheograficheskii ezhe-godnik za 1996 (Moscow, 1998), pp. 181–95
L.A. Openkin, ‘Mekhanizm tormozheniya v sfere obshchestvennykh nauk: istoki vozniknoveniya, faktory vosproizvodstva’, Istoriya SSSR, 4, 1989, p. 7
L. Maksimenkov, ‘Ocherki nomenklaturnoi istorii sovetskoi literatury (1932–1946): Stalin, Bukharin, Zhdanov, Shcherbakov i drugie’, Voprosy literatury, 4, 2003, pp. 251–3
Anna Larina (Bukharina), Nezabyvaemoe (Moscow, 1989), p. 32.
Bukharin, ‘Istoricheskaya nauka i ee prepodavanie’, Izvestiya, 27 January 1936, p. 1
K. Radek, ‘Znachenie istorii dlya revolyutsionnogo proletariata’, Pravda, 27 January 1936, p. 3
Radek, ‘Prepodavanie istorii v nashei shkole’, Pravda, 27 January 1936, p. 1.
I. Stalin, S. Kirov, A. Zhdanov, ‘Zamechaniya o konspekte uchebnika “Novoi istorii”’, Pravda, 27 January 1936, p. 2
I. Stalin, ‘O stat’e Engel’sa “Vneshniaia politika russkogo tsarizma”’, Bol’shevik, 9, 1941, pp. 3–4
A. Latyshev, ‘Kak Stalin Engel’sa svergal’, Rossiiskaya gazeta, 22 December, 1992, p. 4.
N. Bukharin, ‘Mogushchestvennaya federatsiya’, Izvestiya, 2 February 1936, p. 1.
V.I. Lenin, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii (Moscow, 1958–1970), vol. 43, p. 228
A. Leont’ev, ‘Tsenneishii vklad v sokrovishchnitsu marksizmaleninizma’, Pravda, 12 February 1936, p. 4.
N. Bukharin, ‘Otvet na vopros’, Izvestiya, 14 February 1936, p. 1.
Bukharin, ‘Velikie traditsii’, Izvestiya, 5 February 1936, p. 1
P. Drozdov, ‘Reshenie partii i pravitel’stva ob uchebnikakh po istorii i zadachi sovetskikh istorikov’, Istorik-marksist, 1, 1936, pp. 9–22
A. Shestakov, ‘Osnovnye problemy uchebnika “Kratkii kurs istorii SSSR”’, Istorik-marksist, 3, 1937, pp. 85–98
B. Grekov, ‘Kievskaya rus’ i problema genezisa russkogo feodalizma u M.N. Pokrovskogo’, Istorik-marksist, 5–6, 1937, pp. 41–76
A. Savich, ‘Pol’skaya interventsiya nachala XVII veka v otsenke M.N. Pokrovskogo’, Istorik-marksist, 1, 1938, pp. 74–110.
B. Grekov et al. (eds), Protiv antimarksistskoi kontseptsii M.N. Pokrovskogo (Moscow, 1940).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 David Brandenberger
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandenberger, D. (2006). Politics Projected into the Past: What Precipitated the 1936 Campaign Against M.N. Pokrovsky?. In: Thatcher, I.D. (eds) Reinterpreting Revolutionary Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624924_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624924_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54749-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62492-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)