Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
Hitler’s Ethic
  • 334 Accesses

Abstract

I do not know how many times I have heard colleagues and friends ask if the title of my book is an oxymoron. How could a mass murderer like Hitler have had any ethic? Yet, surprisingly, the fanaticism that motivated him to pursue mass killing—and many other policies—stemmed at least in part from his sincerely held (but pernicious) conviction that killing people he deemed inferior would serve a higher moral purpose: advancing the human species in the evolutionary process. This kind of evolutionary ethics was central to Hitler’s ideology and practice, because ultimately Hitler measured every policy by its effect on biological improvement. Various Nazi leaders, such as Rudolf Hess and Hans Schemm, agreed with the geneticist Fritz Lenz that Nazism was “applied biology.”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Proctor, Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988), 62

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phillip T. Rutherford, Prelude to the Final Solution: The Nazi Program for Deporting Ethnic Poles, 1939–1941 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chad Bryant, Prague in Black: Nazi Rule and Czech Nationalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Connelly, “Nazis and Slavs: From Racial Theory to Racist Practice,” Central European History 32 (1999): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hitler, briefing of military leaders on May 23, 1939, in Hitler: Speeches and Proclamations, 1932–1945, ed. Max Domarus, 4 vols. (Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, 1990), 3: 1618–1619.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uwe Mai, “Rasse und Raum”: Agrarpolitik, Sozial-und Raumplanung im NS-Staat (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2002), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilmer Blackburn, Education in the Third Reich: Race and History in Nazi Textbooks (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985), 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerhard Trommer, “Bezüge des NS-Lebenskunde zur Ökologie,” in Medizin, Naturwissenschaft, Technik und Nationalsozialismus: Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten, ed. Christoph Meinel and Peter Voswinckel (Stuttgart: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaft und der Technik, 1994), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andreas Frewer, Medizin und Moral in Weimarer Republik und Nationalsozialismus: Die Zeitschrift “Ethik” unter Emil Abderhalden (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michael Burleigh, Death and Deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany, 1900–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ulf Schmidt, Medical Films, Ethics and Euthanasia in Nazi Germany: The History of the Medical Research and Teaching Films of the Reich Office for Educational Films/Reich Institute for Films in Science and Education, 1933–1945 (Husum: Matthiesen Verlag, 2002), 51

    Google Scholar 

  12. Recently Eric Ehrenreich has argued forcefully for this position in “Otmar von Verschuer and the’ scientific’ Legitimization of Nazi Anti-Jewish Policy,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 21, 1 (2007): 55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrenreich, The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benno Müller-Hill, “Reflections of a German Scientist,” in Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race (Washington, DC: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müller-Hill, Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany, 1933–1945, trans. George R. Fraser (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Rasse und Vererbung als Beruf: Die Hauptforschungsrichtungen am Kaiser-Wilhlem-Institut für Anthropologie, menschliche Erblehre und Eugenik im Nationalsozialismus,” in Rassenforschung an Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituten vor und nach 1933, ed. Hans-Walter Schmuhl (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2003), 190.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Many recent works on Nazi eugenics and anthropology detail this cooperation. One especially good recent work is Hans-Walter Schmuhl, Grenzüberschreitungen: Das Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Anthropologie, menschliche Erblehre und Eugenik 1927–1945 (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gretchen E. Schafft, From Racism to Genocide: Anthropology in the Third Reich (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Richard Weikart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weikart, R. (2009). Conclusion. In: Hitler’s Ethic. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623989_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623989_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38073-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62398-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics