Abstract
The four classical liberals had a number of common ideas on the timeless issues of international relations such as war and peace, trade, international law, and the balance of power. This allows for the presentation of a synthesis in the form of a comprehensive classical liberal theory of IR, which is very different from the current accounts of liberalism in IR theory. A caveat applies, though; the preceding analysis only allows the presentation of the contours of the theory. It must be acknowledged that almost any individual element of the theory could be further elaborated, but this would require chapter-length treatments. That is beyond the scope and intention of the present chapter and of this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Tooby, John, and Leda Cosmides. “The Psychological Foundations of Culture.” In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Edited by J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby. New York: Oxford University Press. 1992. pp. 19–139.
Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Books. 2002. pp. 56–58, 428–431.
Thayer, Bradley A. Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. 2004. pp. 263–270.
Rosen, Stephen Peter. War and Human Nature. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 2005. p. 2.
See Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso. 1996.
Jahn, Beate. “Classical Smoke, Classical Mirror: Kant and Mill in Liberal International Relations Theory.” In Classical Theory in International Relations. Edited by B. Jahn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006. pp. 178–203.
Wolfe, Christopher. Natural Law Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006. p. 255.
Also see Lomasky, Loren E. “Liberalism beyond Borders.” Social Philosophy & Policy 24 (1):206–233. 2007.
See Fisher, David. “Humanitarian Intervention.” In The Price of Peace: Just War in the Twenty-First Century. Edited by C. Reed and D. Ryall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2007. pp. 101–117;
Rengger, N.J. “The Greatest Treason? On the Subtle Temptations of Preventive War.” International Affairs 84 (5):949–961. 2008;
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Just War against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. New York: Basic Books. 2003; Elshtain. Just War Theory, Rengger. On the Just War Tradition.
Higgs, Robert. Against Leviathan: Government Power and a Free Society. Oakland: Independent Institute. 2004;
Higgs, Robert. Depression, War, and Cold War: Studies in Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006.
Robbins, Lionel. Money, Trade and International Relations. London and Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan. 1971. pp. 267–272;
Robbins, Lionel. Economic Planning and International Order. London: Macmillan. 1937. pp. 242–268.
Hill, Christopher. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2003. pp. 138–143.
Also Röpke, Wilhelm. International Order and Economic Integration. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 1959. pp. 43–56.
See Little, Richard. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2007.
Butterfield, Herbert. “The Balance of Power.” In Diplomatic Investigations. Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Edited by H. Butterfield and M. Wight. London: George Allen & Unwin. 1966. pp. 132–148.
See Trebilcock, Michael J., and Robert Howse. The Regulation of International Trade. London and New York: Routledge. 2005.
Lai, Deepak. Reviving the Invisible Hand: The Case for Classical Liberalism in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 2006.
Sally, Razeen. Whither the WTO? A Progress Report on the Doha Round. Washington: Cato Institute. 2003;
Sally, Razeen. Trade Policy, New Century: The WTO, FTAs and Asia Rising. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. 2008.
Barbieri, Katherine. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 2005. pp. 121–137.
Also Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999.
Rengger, N.J. “Seeing (Double) in the Darkness: The Moral Vision of the Anarchical Society.” In The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Edited by R. Little and J. Williams. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006. pp. 39, 45–49; Rengger. Tragedy or Scepticism.
Smith, Steve. “Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Edited by T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. p. 4.
See, for example, Brown. Understanding International Relations, pp. 22–30, 153–157; Koch, K., R.B. Soetendorp, and A. Van Staden. Internationale Betrekkingen. Theorieën en Benaderingen. Utrecht: Aula/Het Spectrum. 1994;
Viotti and Kauppi. Global Philosophers; Jackson, Robert H. and Georg Sørensen. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
See, for example, Freedman, Lawrence. “The Age of Liberal Wars.” Review of International Studies 31:93–108. 2005; Panke and Risse. Liberalism; Williams. Liberalism and War.
Long, David. “Conclusion: Inter-War Idealism, Liberal Internationalism, and Contemporary International Theory.” In Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, Edited by D. Long and P. Wilson. Oxford: Clarendon. 1995. pp. 302–328.
Hill, Christopher. “1939: The Origins of Liberal Realism.” Review of International Studies 15:319–328. 1989.
Clark, Ian. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1989. pp. 212–214.
Martin, Lisa L. “Neoliberalism.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Edited by T Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. pp. 109–126.
Grieco, Joseph M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Edited by D.A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press. 1993. pp. 121–135.
Lamy, Stephen L. “Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism.” In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Edited by J. Baylis and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005. p. 213.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph N. Nye. Power and Interdependence. Cambridge, MA: HarperCollins. 1989. pp. 24–25.
Bernstein, Steven. “Power, Social Purposes, and Legitimacy in Global Governance.” In Global liberalism and Political Order: Toward a New Grand Compromise? Edited by S. Bernstein and L.W. Pauly. Albany: State University of New York Press. 2007. pp. 5–7.
Ruggie, John Gerrard. “At Home Abroad, Abroad at Home: International Liberalization and Domestic Stability in the New World.” In The Globalization of liberalism. Edited by E. Hovden and E. Keene. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave. 2002. pp. 99–122;
Also Bernstein, Steven, and Louis W. Pauly, eds. Global liberalism and Political Order: Toward a New Grand Compromise? Albany: State University of New York Press. 2007.
Owen, John. M. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace.” In Debating the Democratic Peace. Edited by M.E. Brown, S.M. Lynn-Jones and S.E. Miller. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1996. pp. 116–133.
Doyle, Michael W. “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs.” In Debating the Democratic Peace. Edited by M.E. Brown, S.M. Lynn-Jones and S. E. Miller. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1996. pp. 3–27.
For example, MacMillan, John. “Immanuel Kant and the Democratic Peace.” In Classical Theory in International Relations. Edited by B. Jahn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006. p. 52; Doyle. Ways. pp. 251–300;
Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett, and Michael L. Berbaum. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47:371–393. 2003.
Mousseau, Michael, Håvard Hegre, and John R. Oneal. “How the Wealth of Nations Conditions the Liberal Peace.” European Journal of International Relations 9 (2):277–314. 2003.
McDonald, Patrick J. “Peace through Trade or Free Trade?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (4):547–572. 2004.
Deudney, Daniel. “Publius before Kant: Federal-Republican Security and Democratic Peace.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (3):315–356. 2004.
MacMillan, John. “Liberalism and the Democratic Peace.” Review of International Studies 30 (2):179–200. 2004. p. 180.
MacMillan, John. On Liberal Peace: Democracy, War and the International Order. London and New York: I.B. Tauris. 1998. pp. 13–22.
Owen, John. M. Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. 1997. pp. 3, 19–20.
See, for example, Moravcsik, Andrew. “Liberal International Relations Theory: A Scientific Assessment.” In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Edited by C. Elman and M.F. Elman. Cambridge and London: MIT Press. 2003. pp. 159–204.
Doyle, Michael W. “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4):1151–1169. 1986. pp. 1151–1152.
Keohane, Robert O. “International Liberalism Reconsidered.” In The Economic Limits to Modern Politics. Edited by J. Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1990. pp. 173–185.
Moravcsik, Andrew. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (4):513–553. 1997.
Richardson, James L. “Contending Liberalisms: Past and Present.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (1):5–33. 1997.
Copyright information
© 2009 Edwin van de Haar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van de Haar, E. (2009). Liberalism and International Relations Theory. In: Classical Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623972_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623972_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37994-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62397-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)