Abstract
Nowadays David Hume (1711–1776) is most famous for his philosophical work, but his contemporaries were far more interested in his political views. This difference is one of the reasons why his ideas on international political issues are often overlooked or misinterpreted. Although he never wrote a book on international relations, Hume regularly referred to this topic in most of his works, with the exception of his writings on religion. His political writings comprise his Essays and The History of England and they must be seen as reactions to current debates and reflections on topical issues as well as attempts to empirically prove his philosophical views.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Schlereth, T.J. The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought: Its Form and Function in the Ideas of Franklin, Hume and Voltaire, 1694–1790. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press. 1977. p. 108.
Forbes, Duncan. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1975. p. 140.
Klibansky, Raymond, and Ernest C. Mossner. “Introduction.” In New Letters of David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1954. p. xxvii.
For more details and a positive opinion on his diplomatic efforts, see Mossner, Ernest C. The Life of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon. 1980. pp. 489, 533–556.
Bongie, Laurence L. David Hume: Prophet of the Counter-Revolution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. 2000.
Hume, David. The Letters of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon. 1932. number 69a.
Ainslie, D.C. “The Problem of the National Self in Hume’s Theory of Justice.” Hume Studies XXI(2):289–313. 1995. p. 306.
Hayman, J.G. “Notions on National Characters in the Eighteenth Century.” Huntington Library Quarterly 35 (1):1–17. 1971. pp. 13–14.
Stewart, J.B. Opinion and Reform in Hume’s Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1992. p. 311.
King, James T. “The Virtue of Political Skepticism.” Reason Papers 15:24–46. 1990. pp. 24–25, 44.
Pocock, J.G.A. Virtue, Commerce and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985. p. 138.
Glossop, R.J. “Hume and the Future of the Society of Nations.” Hume Studies X (1):46–58. 1984. p. 51.
Oz-Salzberger, Fania. “The Political Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Edited by A. Broadie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003. p. 169.
Black, Jeremy. “The Theory of Balance of Power in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century: A Note on Resources.” Review of International Studies 9 (1):55–61. 1983. pp. 55–61;
Sofka, James R. “The Eighteenth Century International System: Parity or Primacy?” Review of International Studies 27 (2):147–163. 2001. pp. 147–153.
Linares, F. Das Politischen Denken von David Hume. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. 1984. pp. 81–82.
Whelan, F.G. “Robertson, Hume and the Balance of Power.” Hume Studies XXI (2):315–332. 1995. pp. 316–317.
Hume, David. New Letters of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon. 1954. number 127.
Stewart, J.B. The Moral and Political Philosophy of David Hume. New York and London: Columbia University Press. 1963. p. 194.
Danford, J.D. “Hume’s History and the Parameters of Economic Development.” In Liberty in Hume’s History of England. Edited by N. Capaldi and D.W. Livingston. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1990. pp. 161–168.
Stewart. Opinion and Reform, p. 308; Letwin, Shirley Robin. The Pursuit of Certainty: David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Beatrice Webb. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. 1998. p. 116.
Werner, J.M. “David Hume and America.” Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (3):439–456. 1972. pp. 439–456.
Robbins, Lionel. A History of Economic Thought: The LSE Lectures. Edited by Steven G. Medema and Warren J. Samuels. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 2000. p. 151;
Fieser, James, ed. Early Responses to Hume’s Moral, Literary and Political Writings. Bristol: Thoemmes. 2005. pp. xii–xiii.
Skinner, Andrew S. “David Hume: Principles of Political Economy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Edited by D.F. Norton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1993. pp. 239–245.
McGee, R.W. “The Economic Thought of David Hume.” Hume Studies XV (1):185–205. 1989. pp. 197–199.
Miller, D. Philosophy and Ideology in Hume’s Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon. 1981. p. 125.
Soule, E. “Hume on Economic Policy and Human Nature.” Hume Studies XXVI (1):143–157. 2000. p. 146; Hume. E. p. 262.
Manzer, R.A. “The Promise of Peace? Hume and Smith on the Effects of Commerce on War and Peace.” Hume Studies XXII (2):369–382. 1996. pp. 369–382.
Irwin, Douglas A. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1996. p. 76; Sally. Classical liberalism. p. 57.
Muller, Jerry Z. The Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Modern European Thought. New York: Anchor Books. 2002. p. 54.
Cohen, M. “Moral Skepticism and International Relations.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (4):299–346. 1984. p. 301.
For example, Linares. Politische Denken; Nye Jr., Joseph N. “The Changing Nature of World Power.” Political Science Quarterly 105 (2):177–192. 1990;
Brown, Chris. Understanding International Relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave. 2001. p. 107;
Jervis, R. “A Political Science Perspective on the Balance of Power and the Concert.” American Historical Review 97 (3):716–724. 1992. p. 718; Knutsen. History, p. 122;
Waltz, Kenneth N. “Anarchic Orders and Balances of Power.” In Neorealism and Its Critics. Edited by R.O. Keohane. New York: Columbia University Press. 1986. p. 119; Sofka. Eighteenth Century, p. 154;
Vasquez, J.A. Classics of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 1990. pp. 273–276;
Haas, E.B. “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept or Propaganda.” World Politics 5 (4):442–477. 1953. p. 456.
Boucher, David. Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1998. p. 145.
Walzer, M. Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books. 1992. p. 76.
Brown, Chris. Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity. 2002. pp. 40–41, 47–48.
Alderson, Kai, and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Hedley Bull on International Society. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2000. pp. 139–169.
Vincent, R.J. “Order in International Politics.” In Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Edited by J.D.B. Miller and R.J. Vincent. Oxford: Clarendon. 1988. pp. 43–45.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. New York: Charles Scribner’s. 1960, pp. xi–xv.
Rengger, N.J. “Tragedy or Scepticism? Defending the Anti-Pelagian Mind in World Politics.” International Relations 19 (3):321–328. 2005. pp. 323–325.
Copyright information
© 2009 Edwin van de Haar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van de Haar, E. (2009). David Hume and International Society. In: Classical Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623972_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623972_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37994-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62397-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)