Skip to main content

Incorporating the Literary Family

  • Chapter
Romantic Literary Families

Part of the book series: Nineteenth-Century Major Lives and Letters ((19CMLL))

  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

The familiar lines from Home at Grasmere in the epigraph to this chapter encapsulate the essence of collaborative and familial intimacy, and in what follows I pursue the implications of familial incorporation for Coleridge as he sought affiliation first with Southey and the Frickers in the family of Pantisocracy, and then later with the Wordsworths and Hutchinsons in Grasmere’s literary family. To contextualize Coleridge’s literary relationships, I begin by looking at two other models of literary-familial collaboration; in doing so I borrow and extrapolate from Naomi Tadmor’s notion of “incorporation.” As a way of describing “the alliance of two kinship groups” through marriage,1 incorporation involves specific naming conventions that extend the applicability of terms such as brother, sister, mother, and father beyond strict blood relations. I rely on Tadmor’s formulation to demonstrate the suitability of this term to the business model of the literary family and to elucidate the means by which different literary families sought to “incorporate” themselves.

From crowded streets remote, Far from the living and dead wilderness Of the thronged World, Society is here: A true Community, a genuine frame Of many into one incorporate. (MS. D. 612–16)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Naomi Tadmor, Family and Friends in Eighteenth-Century England: Household, Kinship, and Patronage (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001), 133.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Magnuson, Coleridge and Wordsworth: A Lyrical Dialogue (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas McFarland, Romanticism and the Forms of Ruin: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Modalities of Fragmentation (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Wayne Koestenbaum, Double Talk: The Erotics of Male Literary Collaboration (New York: Routledge, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jack Stillinger, Multiple Authorship and the Myth of the Solitary Genius (New York: Oxford UP, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman Fruman, Coleridge, The Damaged Archangel (New York: George Braziller, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lucy Newlyn, “Coleridge and the Anxiety of Reception.” Romanticism 1.2 (1995): 206–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (second edition) (New York: Oxford UP, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Regina Hewitt, The Possibilities of Society: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Sociological Viewpoint of English Romanticism (Albany: SUNY Press, 1997), vii-xviii and chapters 3, 5, and 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.V. Barry, Jane Taylor: Prose and Poetry (London: Humphrey Milford, 1925), xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H.J. Jackson, ed., Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Selected Letters (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987), ix

    Google Scholar 

  12. RLE makes the comment in the letter to ALB quoted from this sequence. On the Aikins, see Betsy Rodgers, Georgian Chronicle: Mrs. Barbauld and Her Family (London: Methuen, 1958); see also chapter one, note 68.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donald Reiman, ed., The Romantics Reviewed (New York: Garland Publishing, 1972), part A, vol. 1, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arthur Aikin and Charles Rochemont. A Dictionary of Chemistry and Mineralogy, with an Account of the Processes employed in many of the most important Chemical Manufactures (London: J. & A. Arch and W. Phillips, 1807).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Stuart Curran, “Jane Taylor’s Satire on Satire.” The Satiric Eye: Forms of Satire in the Romantic Period. Ed. Steven E. Jones (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 139–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Robert Barth, Coleridge and the Power of Love (Columbia, MO: U of Missouri Press, 1988), 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alison Hickey, “Coleridge, Southey, ‘and Co.’: Collaboration and Authority.” Studies in Romanticism 37 (1998): 305–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.T. Coleridge and Charles Lloyd. Poems 1797. (Poole: Woodstock Books, 1997), 88.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas Cooper, Some Information Respecting America (London: Joseph Johnson, 1794)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.P. Brissot de Warville, New Travels in the United States of America. Trans. Joel Barlow (London: J. S. Jordan, 1792)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert Imlay, A Topographical Description of North America (London: J. Debrett, 1792).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. J.M.D. Meiklejohn (Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 1990), 138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Scott Krawczyk

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krawczyk, S. (2009). Incorporating the Literary Family. In: Romantic Literary Families. Nineteenth-Century Major Lives and Letters. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623385_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics