Abstract
Western scholarship about Native peoples continues to dominate published works, academic departments, and projects directed from within universities and research institutions across the United States. It is clear that Western scholars have a defined purpose and research agenda. But the articulated purposes are distinct from what contemporary Native researchers and communities are proposing. I argue in this chapter that (1) all research is purposeful, and (2) purposeful research in American Indian education must be matched with appropriate and authentic research methodologies that respond uniquely to Native-defined purposes and needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Rachelle Winkle-Wagner, Cheryl A. Hunter, Debora Hinderliter Ortloff
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yazzie-Mintz, T. (2009). Intimately Biased: Creating Purposeful Research in American Indian Education with Appropriate and Authentic Methodology. In: Winkle-Wagner, R., Hunter, C.A., Ortloff, D.H. (eds) Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Educational Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622982_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622982_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37652-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62298-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)