Skip to main content

Rethinking Participatory Limits

From Music Standards to Hip-Hop

  • Chapter
Race and Curriculum
  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

This final chapter focuses on more recent (post-1960) curriculum guidelines and standards. It is about the mood and tenor of those reforms and how they reflect contemporary Nation at Risk and No Child Left Behind movements for national educational reforms. In the last two decades, the music curriculum responds to national emergencies such as the child “left behind” with a profile of the child who prepares for the global economy. In this chapter, I analyze proposals made by the state of Wisconsin issued during the last decades of the twentieth century and curriculum guides from the period from 1997 through 2005.I also describe some of the controversy surrounding hip-hop that can be considered reenactments of preferences for particular dispositions. Toward the end of the chapter, I take up the process of transforming (alchemizing) hip-hop practices as music study and the double gestures involved in making hip-hoppers into school music exemplars. This is followed by some concluding remarks on proposals by other educators who are also working to break down the demographic boundaries so detrimental across subject areas as well as in music programs. I conclude with some thoughts on the difficult contradiction, even oxymoron, of planning democracy for others and the limits of progressive thought and “democratic” reform.

Interviewer: Do you think the new curriculum guides will be followed by most music teachers in the district?

Mr. K., music teacher: You know, I think a lot of them will try to, but there will be a problem because some won’t follow it at all and then the next teacher will have to pick up the pieces. To do the new curriculum well you have to work on it about 80% of class time—drilling all the elements and notation skills over and over. That leaves very little time for just doing music.

Interviewer: What’s the most difficult aspect of teaching for you?

Mr. K. I think it’s when the kids, especially the more outgoing ones, just want to sing along or take part of the lesson or interact. I am completely torn between reining them in and just letting them enjoy it. (Gustafson 1991, 16)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bethany Bryson, “Anything But Heavy Metal’: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes,” American Sociological Review 16, no. 5 (1996): 884–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Ruth Gustafson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gustafson, R.I. (2009). Rethinking Participatory Limits. In: Race and Curriculum. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622449_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics