Abstract
The politics of recognition by definition urges us to see and respect a clear difference among social groups in terms of their identity and that of the culture at large. Charles Taylor is, therefore, correct to claim that the politics of recognition is dialogical and, by implication, totally relational in character (1992). The presence of asymmetric power relationships frequently spoils this dialogical progress, however, and leads to stereotyping of minorities. No culture is single, pure, or monolithic; the same goes for the individual experience that develops from it (Said, 1994; Rex, 1992). All cultures involve encounter and ongoing negotiations of identity. Heterogeneity of historical experience exists accumulatively and indeterminately. But the politics of recognition, along with those with the power to offer recognition, frequently gloss over the diversity of people in their actual setting and flatten the ever-present complexities of the social group, culture, and identity purportedly recognized (Dyson, 1994; Stiehm, 1994). This phenomenological circumstance of culture is incompatible with the politics of recognition that must fix an identity as static and unitary if it is to be a discernible thing for recognition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Baker, Hugh D. R. 1966. “The Five Great Clans of the New Territories.” Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 6, 25–47.
Chan, Selina. 1996. “Negotiating Coloniality and Tradition: The Identity of Indigenous Inhabitants in Hong Kong.” Working Paper Series 131. Singapore: Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
Chun, Allen. 1985. “Land Is to Live: A Study of the Concept of Tsu in a Hakka Chinese Village, New Territories, Hong Kong.” Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.
Chun, Allen. 1990. “Policing Society: The ‘Rational Practice’ of British Colonial Land Administration in the New Territories ofHong Kong c. 1900.” Journal of Historical Sociology 3, no. 4, 401–421.
Chun, Allen. 1996. “The Lineage-Village Complex in Southern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship.” Current Anthropology 37, no. 3, 429–450.
Chun, Allen. 2000. Unstructuring Chinese Society: The Fictions of Colonial Practice and the Changing Realities of “Land” in the New Territories of Hong Kong. Australia: Harwood Academic.
Dyson, Michael Eric. 1994. “Essentialism and the Complexities of Racial Identity.” In David Theo Goldberg, ed. Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader, 218–229. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eastern Express. 1994. “Villages Pledge to Fight for Tradition.” April 18.
Faure, David. 1986. The Structure of Chinese Rural Society: Lineage and Village in the Eastern New Territories, Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Freedman, Maurice. 1958. Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London: Athlone Press.
Freedman, Maurice. 1966. Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London: Athlone Press.
Freedman, Maurice. 1976. “A Report in Social Research in the New Territories of Hong Kong.” Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 16, 191–260.
Friedman, John. T. 2005. “Making Politics, Making History: Chiefship and the Post-apartheid State in Namibia.” Journal of Southern African Studies 31, no. 1, 23–50.
Goldberg, David Theo. 1994. “Introduction: Multicultural Conditions.” In Goldberg, ed. Multiculturalism, 1–44.
Heung Yee Kuk. 1996. “Nanwang de shiyue, nanwang de guanghui, nanwang de chuantong: Xiangyiju qishi zhounian jinian tekan” (Unforgettable Time, Unforgettable Glory, Unforgettable Misery). Special Issue for the 70th Anniversary of Heung Yee Kuk, 78–79. Hong Kong: Heung Yee Kuk.
Hong Kong Government. 1899. “Despatches and Other Papers Relating to the Extension of the Colony of Hongkong.” In Papers Laid before the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.
Hong Kong Government. 1905. “New Territories Land Ordinance.” In Hong Kong Government Gazette 3. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.
Hong Kong Government. 1910. Law of Hong Kong, Chapter 97, New Territories Land Ordinance. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.
Hong Kong Government. 1984. Law of Hong Kong, Chapter 97, New Territories Land Ordinance. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.
Hong Kong Legislative Council. 1993. Report of the Meetings 1993/94, PT. 2, 1040–1042. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.
Hong Kong Legislative Council. 1994. Report of the Meetings 1993/94, PT. 6, 4539–4589. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.
Huang, Shu Min. 1982. “Hong Kong’s Colonial Administration and the Land Tenure System.” In Shu Min Huang, ed. Rural Hong Kong: The Anthropological Perspectives, 56–72. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Department of Sociology and Anthropology.
Jones, Carol. 1995. “The New Territories Inheritance Law: Colonization and the Elites.” In Veronica Pearson and Benjamin K. P. Leung, eds. Women in Hong Kong, 167–192. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Lam, Cheong-Yee Eric. 1986. “An Assessment of the Role of the Heung Yee Kuk in the Formulation of Rural Politics in the New Territories.” Ph.D. diss., University of Hong Kong.
Ming Pao. 1994a. “Xiangyiju chengli baojia weizu kangzheng zongbu, cu gangfu guangfan diaocha yuanjumin yixiang” (Heung Yee Kuk established the communal headquarters in defense families and clans, and urged the Hong Kong Government to collect people’s opinion by full investigation). March 26.
Ming Pao. 1994b. “Yuanze zhide budaibiao chuantong zhishi” (The fight for principle will not result in the loss of tradition). March 31.
Moberg, Mark. 1992. “Continuity under Colonial Rule: The Alcadle System and the Garifuna in Belize, 1858–1969.” Ethnohistory 39, no. 1, 1–19.
Neale, Walter. 1969. “Land Is to Rule.” In Robert Eric Frykenberg, ed. Land Control and Social Structure in Indian History, 3–15. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Nelson, Howard G. H. 1969. “British Administration in the New Territories of Hong Kong and Its Effects on Chinese Social Organization.” Paper presented at the London-Cornell Project for East and Southeast Studies Conference, Adele en Haut (August 24–30).
Ng, Wai Man. 1996. “Village Revitalization/Disintegration: An Assessment of Suburbanization, Land Administration and Small House Development in the New Territories.” Ph.D. diss., University of Hong Kong.
Nicholas, Thomas. 1999. Democracy Denied: Identity, Civil Society and Illiberal Democracy in Hong Kong. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
Ranger, Terrance. 1996. “The Invention of Tradition in Colonial Africa.” In Eric Hobsbawm and Terrance Ranger, eds. The Invention of Tradition, 211–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rex, John. 1992. Race and Ethnicity. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Said, Edward. 1994. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage books.
South China Morning Post. 1994a. “Inheritance Protest Ends in Violence.” March 23.
South China Morning Post. 1994b. “Rural Visit Passes off Peacefully.” March 27.
Stiehm, Judith. 1994. “Diversity’s Diversity.” In Goldberg, ed. Multiculturalism, 140–156.
Taylor, Charles. 1992. Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Touraine, Alain. 1988. Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Watson, Rubie. S. 1985. Inequality among Brothers: Class and Kinship in South China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welsh, Frank. 1993. A History of Hong Kong. London: HarperCollins.
Wesley-Smith, Peter. 1980. Unequal Treaty 1898–1997: China, Britain and Hong Kong’s New Territories. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Xiandai ribao. 1994. “Xiuding tiaoli wu yingmou, peng dinghang: Shunying nannu pingdeng” (No conspiracy behind the Amendment Bill, Chris Patten: This is just to meet the call for gender equality). March 30.
Zhang, Yuefeng, Jiang Qiongzhu, and Liu Yanfen, eds. 1995. Cong zhe yitian kaishi: Zhengqu pingdeng jichengquan zilaice (From the present day on: A resource book on the fight for equal inheritance right). Hong Kong: Funu Tuanti Zhengqu Pingdeng Jichengquan Lianxi.
Copyright information
© 2009 Siu-Keung Cheung, Joseph Tse-Hei Lee, and Lida V. Nedilsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheung, SK. (2009). “This Is My Mother’s Land!”: An Indigenous Woman Speaks Out. In: Marginalization in China. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622418_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622418_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37844-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62241-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)