Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

It is clear from the preceding chapter that “bad” maintenance differed little from other, acceptable practices. Historians may split hairs over terminology, but generally agree that service relationships existed on a continuum including a wide range of people engaged in diverse relationships. Before turning to the literature in the remaining chapters, in the following pages I will use a documentary source, letter collections, to explore how medieval people themselves discussed a variety of service relationships. The dividing line between “good” and “bad” maintenance appears complicated to these fifteenth-century people, many of whom were negotiating the demands of multiple allegiances discussed in chapter 1. As we shall see, lord-retainer and the less noble master-servant relationships were often linked to bad maintenance in these documents. Nevertheless, it would appear that what medieval people saw as bad maintenance reflected personal bias and perspective as much as it did actual deviation in practice from the cultural norm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Christine Carpenter, ed. Kingsford’s Stonor Letters and Papers 1290–1483 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For general information on the Stonors, see also Christine Carpenter, “The Stonor Circle in the Fifteenth Century,” in Rulers and Ruled in Late Medieval England, ed. Rowena Archer and Simon Walker (London: Hambledon Press, 1995), p. 25

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.J. Jefferies, “Profitable Fourteenth-Century Legal Practice and Landed Investment: The Case of Judge Stonor, c. 1281–1354,” Southern History 15 (1993): 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For general history of the family, see Joan Kirby, “A Fifteenth-Century Family, The Plumptons of Plumpton, and Their Lawyers, 1461–1515,” Northern History 25 (1989): 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruth Wilcock, “Local Disorder in the Honour of Knaresborough, c. 1438–1461 and the National Context,” Northern History 41 (2004): 39–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. For the legal background of this situation, I am drawing on Colin Richmond, “Elizabeth Clere: Friend of the Pastons,” in Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts in Late Medieval Britain: Essays for Felicity Riddy, ed. Jocelyn Wogan-Browne, Rosalynn Voaden, Arlyn Diamond, Ann Hutchison, Carol Meale, and Lesley Johnson (Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2000), pp. 251–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. I cite from the letters using the volume, number of the letter, and line number when appropriate. Norman Davis, ed. Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1971). II. 592–94

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carole Rawcliffe and Susan Flower, “English Noblemen and Their Advisers: Consultation and Collaboration in the Later Middle Ages,” Journal of British Studies 25 (1986): 157–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. For the concept of honor and shame among the gentry as distinct from that of the nobility, see Philippa Maddern, “Honour Among the Pastons: Gender and Integrity in Fifteenth-Century English Provincial Society,” Journal of Medieval History 14 (1988): 357–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A brief but powerful additional example of a man calling upon his lords for aid is John Chancy. Describing himself as a squire of the Duke of Exeter, Chancy entered into a disputed property, and to ensure its continued possession by his family, enfeoffed the Duke of Exeter, the Duke of Buckingham, and the Earl of Eu in it. We know about the event from the rival claimant’s letters and petition to Parliament for redress against such powerful opponents. See pages 177–78 and 191–92 in Christine Carpenter, ed. The Armburgh Papers: The Brokholes Inheritance in Warwickshire, Hertfordshire, and Essex c.1417–1453 (Woodbridge, Suffolk: The Boydell Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas Stapleton, ed. The Plumpton Correspondence (Gloucester: Alan Sutton, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Kathleen E. Kennedy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kennedy, K.E. (2009). Maintaining a Family. In: Maintenance, Meed, and Marriage in Medieval English Literature. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621626_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics