Skip to main content

Quo Vadis, the Dialogue of Civilizations? September 11 and Muslim-West Relations

  • Chapter
Civilizational Dialogue and World Order

Part of the book series: Culture and Religion in International Relations ((CRIR))

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

In 1998, in a speech at the 53rd Session of the UN General Assembly, the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mohammad Khatami, called “for a dialogue among civilizations and cultures instead of a clash between them.”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Chandra Muzaffar (2005) At the Crossroads (Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: International Movement for a Just World—JUST).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Mahmood Mamdani (2004) Good Muslim, Bad Muslim (New York: Pantheon Books).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The history and growth of Hizbullah is elaborated in Abdar Rahman Koya (2006) Hizbullah Party of God (Kuala Lumpur: The Other Press in association with Crescent International).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a detailed account of Western machinations in the “Middle East,” see Robert Fisk (2006) The Great War for Civilisation (Britain: Harper Perennial).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Chandra Muzaffar (1996) Dominance of the West over the Rest (Malaysia: JUST) and (1996) Human Wrongs (Malaysia: JUST), on how hegemony has always trumped democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See “Algeria in the Dock” in Chandra Muzaffar (1993) Human Rights and the New World Order (Penang: Just World Trust).

    Google Scholar 

  7. This point emerges in several of the dialogues between Noam Chomsky and Gilbert Achcar (2007) Perilous Power The Middle East and US Foreign Policy (London: Hamish Hamilton).

    Google Scholar 

  8. An exception in Western literature on Muslim women from an ear-lier period would be Charis Waddy (1980) Women in Muslim History (London and New York: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Some interesting insights on the weapons of mass destruction issue and the decision to go to war can be found in Bob Woodward (2006) State of Denial. Bush at War Part III (New York: Simon and Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Michael Northcott (2004) An Angel Directs The Storm (London-New York: I. B. Tauris).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Also, Stephen R Sizer (2004) Christian Zionists (Surrey, Britain: Christ Church Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  12. There is some discussion on this in Zafar Ishaq Ansari and John L. Esposito (eds.) (2001) Muslims and the West: Encounter and Dialogue (Islamabad and Washington, DC: Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University and Centre for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown University).

    Google Scholar 

  13. This is especially because of the United States’s formidable nuclear arsenal. For a comprehensive discussion on the nuclear weapons and hegemony, see Joseph Gerson (2007) Empire and the Bomb (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Resistance to hegemony is analyzed in Chandra Muzaffar (2007) “Resisting Hegemony; Raising Dignity,” in Corrine Kumar (ed.), Asking, We Walk (Bangalore: Streelekha Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  15. It has been exhaustively examined in Phyllis Bennis (2006) Challenging Empire (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The popularity of James Petras (2006) The Power of Israel in the United States (Atlanta: Clarity Press), which went into a third print within three months of its appearance toward the end of 2007, is testimony to this. The John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt (2006) essay, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy” (John. F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Working Paper no. RWP06–011, March 13), also generated a lot of debate.

    Google Scholar 

  17. So did the Jimmy Carter (2006) Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid (New York: Simon and Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Among the scholars who have advanced this argument is Chalmers Johnson (2004) The Sorrows of Empire (United Kingdom: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The weaknesses and shortcomings of the Muslim community are discussed in “Morality in Public Life: The Challenge Facing Muslims,” in Chandra Muzaffar (2003) Muslims, Dialogue, Terror (Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: International Movement for a Just World).

    Google Scholar 

  20. The imperative importance of emphasizing the “universal” in all religions has been a constant theme in my writings since the mid-seventies. See for instance Chandra Muzaffar (ed.) (1979) The Universalism of Islam (Penang: Aliran).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Michális S. Michael and Fabio Petito

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muzaffar, C. (2009). Quo Vadis, the Dialogue of Civilizations? September 11 and Muslim-West Relations. In: Michael, M.S., Petito, F. (eds) Civilizational Dialogue and World Order. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621602_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics