Abstract
An agricultural expert visited a small mid-west community to give a lecture on state-of-the-art farming tools and techniques. All but one of the local farmers attended. Several days later, one of the attending farmers asked the one stubborn farmer why he did not come to the lecture. The old fellow replied, “I already know how to farm a lot better than I do.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
APQC Member Teleconference: Six Sigma and KM—Exploring the potential of two powerful disciplines. Presented in 2007. Accessed via Web site (www.apqc.org) July 24, 2007.
APQC, previously known as the American Productivity & Quality Center, is a member-based nonprofit worldwide organization with about 500 corporate members. It conducts research, develops benchmarking data, and disseminates learning about best practices in the areas of knowledge management and process improvement. These periodic member teleconferences support that agenda.
Brown, J.S., and P. Duguid. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review 3: 90–111.
This paper was written at a time when some argued that the new information economy would sweep away many traditional organizations such as the press, media, universities, and even governments and nations. The authors counter that many such organizations will adapt and propose an organizational architecture for organizational knowledge management.
Davenport, T.H. (1997). Information ecology. New York, Oxford University Press.
Davenport offers a holistic view of the information and knowledge environment, explaining why technology is insufficient to address the broader needs of dynamic organizations in today’s environment. Davenport, T.H., D.W. DeLong et al. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review 39(2): 43–57.
The authors describe several successful knowledge management initiatives then summarize a set of factors influencing success including; linkage to economic performance or industry value, technological (IT) and organizational (roles and groups responsible for knowledge management) infrastructure, standard yet flexible knowledge structures, and a knowledge-friendly culture.
Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
This book is among the most practical of the academic books on the subject. It offers real insight to real-world issues and opportunities with respect to improving organizational knowledge management.
FAA Aerospace Forecast, 2006–2017 (2006). www.faa.gov/data_statistics. This recurring forecast provides insights to trends across the aviation industry
Leonard, D., and S. Sensiper. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review 40(3) (Spring): 112–131.
Innovation, the source of sustained advantage for most companies, depends upon the individual and collective expertise of employees. Some of this expertise is captured and codified in software, hardware, and processes. Yet tacit knowledge also underlies many competitive capabilities—a fact driven home to some companies in the wake of aggressive downsizing, when undervalued knowledge walked out the door.
Mailloux, E.N. (1989). Engineering information systems. Annual review of information science and technology. M.E. Williams, ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science: 239–266.
Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (2003). Eleventh Edition, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, Springfield Massachusetts.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
This is an excellent source for understanding the practical dimensions of organization structure, what should drive it, and how to optimize it for the specific nature of the work the organization is trying to accomplish.
O’Dell, C., and C.J. Grayson. (1998a). If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. California management Review 40 (3) (Spring): 154–173.
According to O’Dell and Grayson, Junkins and Platt recognized early what many other managers are just beginning to realize: that inside their own organizations lies, unknown and untapped, a vast treasure house of knowledge, know-how, and best practices. If tapped, this information could drop millions to the bottom line and yield huge gains in speed, customer satisfaction, and organizational competence.
Pinelli, T.E., R.O. Barclay et al. (1997). Knowledge diffusion in the U.S aerospace industry. London, Ablex Publishing.
This two-volume book presents the results of a ten-year study to examine knowledge diffusion as a source of innovation across the aerospace industry. The study was particularly interested in understanding how government funded research and development results found their way into the industrial complex.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York, Doubleday & Company. Polanyi, a scientist turned philosopher, wrote this small book of less than 100 pages in a 4 inches by 7 inches that is often cited as the first published usage of the notion of tacit knowing. Polanyi described tacit knowing as knowing more than one is capable of describing. For example, we can recognize a person’s mood by looking at their face but can describe only vaguely what we see that gives us that insight.
Prusak, L. (1997). Knowledge in organizations. Boston, ButterworthHeinemann.
Prusak argues that leaders have been quick to acknowledge the importance of knowledge to organizational success but lack completely any notion of how to manage that capability. He proceeds to describe techniques and approaches that have been beneficial.
Quintas, P.R., K. Ruikar, C. Anumba, A. Al-Ghassani, C. Egbu, E. Kurul, and V.J. Hutchinson. (2004). Techniques and technologies for knowledge management in UK construction. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Construction Project Management. Toronto, Canada.
Scarborough, H., and J. Swan. (1999). Case studies in knowledge management. London, Institute of Personnel Development.
This review of several case studies offers insights into practical issues and challenges when deploying knowledge management projects.
Zack, M.H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review 4(3): 125–145.
Zack asserts that while most organizations focus on the management of explicit knowledge, a smaller number of organizations are finding relatively greater success when they take actions that foster the use of tacit knowledge.
Copyright information
© 2009 Jerry L. Wellman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wellman, J.L. (2009). Introduction. In: Organizational Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621541_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621541_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37343-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62154-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)