Skip to main content

Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Boundaries: Common Standards and Conflicting Values in the Protection of Human Rights in the European Legal Space

  • Chapter
An Identity for Europe

Abstract

No area of “legal production” better illustrates the themes of uniformity and diversity and of European multiculturalism than the area of judicial protection against violation of fundamental human rights.1 It is an area of “legal production” par excellence since in this area, since the treaties were silent, it was the court of justice that constructed the entire legal architecture. Thus it is an illustration of how legal actors, with little guidance from political sources, have tried to grapple with the issues of diverse cultural norms.

The two articles by Joseph H. H. Weiler were originally published before the most recent constitutional developments in the legal order of the European Union. We have decided to retain them because of their theoretical and philosophical importance which transcends the specificity of the positive law on which they are based.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Cases

  • Case 1/58 Stork (1959) ECR 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 2/92 The Queen and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food, ex parte Dennis Clifford Bostock, Decision of March 24, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 4/73 J. Nold, Kohlen and Baustoffgrosshandlung v. Commission of the European Communities (1974) ECR 491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 11/70 Internazionale Handelsgesellschaft (1970) ECR 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 12/86 Demirel (1987) ECR 3719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 29/69 Strauder (1969) ECR 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case 44/79 Liselotte Hauer v. Land Rheinland-Pfalz (1979) ECR 3727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joined Cases 60 and 61/84 Cinéthèque (1985) ECR 2605.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary sources General

  • Cassese, Antonio, Andrew Clapham, and Joseph Weiler (eds.). 1992. European Union. The Human Rights Challenge, vols. I, II, and III. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppel, Jason and Aidan O’Neil. 1992. “The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously.” CML Rev 29: 669–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermers Henry G. and Denis Welbroeck. 2001 (6th ed.). Judicial Protection in the European Communities. London: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1986. “Eurocracy and Distrust: Some Questions Concerning the Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights Within the Legal Order of the European Communities.” Washington Law Review 61: 1103–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H. H. and Nicolas J. S. Lockhart. 1995. “Taking Rights Seriously. The European Court of Justice and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence. Common Market Law Review 32: 51 (Part 1) and 579 (Part 2).

    Google Scholar 

On human rights as value system and on cultural relativism

  • An-Na’im Abdullahi Ahmed (ed.). 1995. Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundes Renteln, Alison. 1985. “The Unanswered Challenge of Relativism and the Consequences for Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 7(4): 514–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1985–1992). “Thou Shalt Not Oppress a Stranger: On the Judicial Protection of the Human Rights of Non-EC Nationals—A Critique.” European Journal of International Law 3: 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

On European Human Rights application by national jurisdictions

  • Arnull J. 1993. “Applying the Common Rules on the Free Movement of Persons—the Role of the National Judiciary in the Light of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice,” in Schermers H. G. (ed.), Free Movement of Persons in Europe. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, Sir Thomas. 1992. “ ‘There is a World Elsewhere’: The Changing Perspective of English Law.” International Comparative Law Quarterly 41: 513–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “The European Convention on Human Rights, Time to Incorporate.” Law Quarterly Review 109 (July): 390–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown W. 1992. “The Infiltration of a Bill of Rights.” Public Law, Autumn: 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drzemczewski, Andrew Z. 1983. European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, Sir John. 1993. “Is the High Court of Justice the Guardian of Fundamental Constitutional Rights?” Public Law, Spring: 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1987. “The European Court at a Crossroads: Community Human Rights and Member State Action,” in Pierre Pescatore, Francesco Capotorti (eds.) Du Droit International au Droit de l’Intégration: Liber Amicorum. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

On relations between Human Rights and European Integration

  • Frowein, Jochen, Stephen Schulhofer, and Martin Shapiro. 1985. “The Protection of Fundamental Rights as a Vehicle of Integration,” in Mauro Cappelletti, Monica Seccombe, and Joseph H. H. Weiler (eds.). Integration through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience, vols. I, II, and III. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini G. F. 1989. “A Constitution for Europe.” CML Rev 26: 595–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatore, Pierre. 1981. “The Context and Significance of Fundamental Rights in the Law of the European Communities.” Human rights law journal 2 (3/4): 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

On relations between community protection, Human Rights, and the European Convention on Human Rights

  • Cohen-Jonathan Gérard. 1977. “La Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et la Communauté européenne,” in Mélanges Fernand Dehousse, vol.1: 164 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Salvia I. 1979. “La Protezione dei diritti dell’uomo nel quadro della Convenzione europea e second ail dirritto communitario: interferenze e problemi di coordinamento.” Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionale 489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grief, N. 1991. “The Domestic Impact of the ECHR as Mediated through Community Law.” Public Law, Winter: 555–567. Macdonald Ronald. St. John. 1990. “The Margin of Appreciation in the Jurisprudence of the

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Human Rights,” in Andrew Clapham and Frank Emmert (eds.), The Protection of Human Rights in Europe, I/2. Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law: 95–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipkorn Jörn. 1993. “La Communauté européenne et la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme.” Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 221: 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Riva Kastoryano

Copyright information

© 2009 Joseph H. H. Weiler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiler, J.H.H. (2009). Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Boundaries: Common Standards and Conflicting Values in the Protection of Human Rights in the European Legal Space. In: Kastoryano, R. (eds) An Identity for Europe. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621282_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics