Abstract
In an anonymous essay published in the November 1832 issue of the New Monthly Magazine, L.E.L. (Letitia Elizabeth Landon) defined the origin and use of poetry as originating “in that idea of superior beauty and excellence inherent in every nature—and it is employed to keep that idea alive; and the very belief in excellence is one cause of its existence” (“Ancient and Modern” 160). The imagination is the “beginning as well as the ornament of civilization. It civilizes because it refines” (161). Margaret Linley discusses the ways that this essay “captures the idea of civilization as both a historical process and as an achieved condition; without poetry there will be no civil nation and without civility there will be no poetry. … Poetry thus guides the modern nation into being and also preserves it from degeneration” (Linley 431). L.E.L.’s lofty prescription for civilization conflates poetry with morality, religion, empire, and feminine ornamentation, a combination that women’s magazines packaged as a domestic commodity. Conduct books contributed to this directive by recommending poetry as a worthy pursuit for women readers, exemplified in advice given to them in 1842 by the anonymous author of The English Maiden: Her Moral and Domestic Duties: “Read poetry. If it be true poetry, it is the twin-sister of religion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
I am grateful to scholars of nineteenth-century American literature for their efforts to articulate the purposes and aesthetics of sentimental literature. I lean heavily on them for mapping the territory of this argument. See Aleta Feinsod Cane and Susan Alves, eds., “The Only Efficient Instrument”: American Women Writers and the Periodical, 1837–1916 (Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 2001);
Dale Bauer and Philip Gould, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Writing (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001);
Nina Baym, “Melodramas of Beset Manhood: How Theories of American Fiction Exclude Women Authors,” American Quarterly 33 (1981): 123–39;
Paula Bernat Bennett, The Emancipatory Project of American Women’s Poetry, 1800–1900 (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003) and “Not Just Filler and Not Just Sentimental: Women’s Poetry in American Victorian Periodicals, 1860–1900,” Periodical Literature in Nineteenth-Century America, ed. Kenneth M. Price and Susan Belasco Smith (Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1995), 202–19;
Joanne Dobson, “Reclaiming Sentimental Literature,” American Literature 69:2 (June 1997): 263–87;
Mary Loeffelholz, From School to Salon: Reading Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Poetry (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2004);
and June Howard, “What Is Sentimentality?” American Literary History 11:1 (Spring 1999): 63–81.
Copyright information
© 2009 Kathryn Ledbetter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ledbetter, K. (2009). Introduction. In: British Victorian Women’s Periodicals. Nineteenth-Century Major Lives and Letters. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620186_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620186_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37064-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62018-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)