Skip to main content

A Report Card for Lula: Progress in Education

  • Chapter
Brazil under Lula

Abstract

When President Lula came into office in January 2003, he inherited a government that had made progress in confronting Brazil’s social inequalities. During the 1990s, the Cardoso administration together with state and local governments, focused on improving Brazil’s abysmal record in education. For example, in 1990, adults over age 15 had on average only 4 years of schooling (World Bank 2007). Under Cardoso, the federal government made sweeping changes in the public education system. At the same time, mayors and governors enacted innovative conditional cash transfer programs that paid poor children to attend school. These programs evolved into the federal Bolsa Escola program by 2001. During Cardoso’s tenure, school attendance increased, grade repetition rates fell, and teacher quality was improved. By 2002, almost all Brazilian children aged 7 to 14 were attending school. But Lula faced a difficult challenge because the relatively easy task of increasing children’s school attendance had been achieved. What remained were the more difficult tasks of increasing the years of schooling completed, and raising levels of student learning.

The author would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Marcia Azanha, Bruno Laranjeira, and the participants in the Lula workshop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arends-Kuenning, Mary, Andrea Ferro, and Deborah Levison. 2006. “Policy Note: Early School-leaving.” Paper Prepared for the Youth at Risk in the Latin American and Caribbean Region Policy Toolkit Workshop, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arends-Kuenning, Mary, Ana Kassouf, Ana Fava, and Alexandre de Almeida. 2005. “The Impact of School Quality and School Incentive Programs on Children’s Schooling and Work in Brazil.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings, Providence, RI, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, Ângela, Jorge Abrahão de Castro, Martha Cassiolato, and Paulo Corbucci. 2006. “Subsídios para melhorar a educação no Brasil.” In Anna Maria Peliano, ed. Desafios e Perspectivas da Política Social. Texto para Discussão No. 1248. Brasília, Brazil: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. pp. 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezerra, Márcio, Ana Lúcia Kassouf, and Mary Arends-Kuenning. 2007. “The Impact of Child Labor and School Quality on Academic Achievement in Brazil.” Paper Presented at the Seminar on the Quality of Education in Latin America, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buarque, Cristovam. 2006. “Lula’s Education Program for Brazil: A Grim Comedy of Errors.” Brazzil Magazine, January30. Available at http://www.brazzil.com/articles/160-january-2006/9515.html accessed on September 2, 2008.

  • Buarque, Cristovam. 2007. “Only a Revolution Will Take Brazil Out of the 19th Century.” Brazzil Magazine, April 2. Available at http://www.brazzil.com/component/content/article/178-april-2007/9851.html accessed on September 2, 2008.

  • Caiafa Salgado, Maria Umbelina. 1999. “Training, Salaries, and Work Conditions of Teachers of the First Grades of Primary School.” In Laura Randall and Joan B. Anderson, eds., Schooling for Success: Preventing Repetition and Dropout in Latin American Primary Schools. Armonk, NY: Columbia University Seminar Series and London: Sharpe. pp. 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, Martin, Amber Gove, Susanna Loeb, Jeffery Marshall, and Miguel Socias. 2004. “How Schools and Students Respond to School Improvement Programs: The Case of Brazil’s PDE.” Forthcoming, Economics of Education Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mello, Luiz, and Mombert Hoppe. 2005. “Education Attainment in Brazil: The Experience of FUNDEF.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrão, Maria Eugénia, Kaizô Iwakami Beltrão, and Denis Paulo dos Santos. 2002. “O impacto de políticas de não-repetência sobre o aprendizado dos alunos da 4ª série.” Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico 32(3):495–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folha Online: Folha de São Paulo. “Câmara aprova texto base da MP que cria o Fundeb.” October 4, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, Paul, Harry Patrinos, and Marta Rubio-Codina. 2006. “Empowering Parents to Improve Education: Evidence from Rural Mexico.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3935. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Nora, and Emiliana Vegas. 2005. “Educational Finance Equalization, Spending, Teacher Quality, and Student Outcomes.” In Emiliana Vegas, ed. Incentives to Improve Teaching: Lessons from Latin America. Washington, DC: The World Bank. pp. 151–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James. 2006. “Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children.” Science 312:1900–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). 2004. “Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares— POF 2002–2003: Excesso de peso atinge 38,8 milhôes de brasileiros adultos.” Comunicação Social, December 16, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). 2007. “Educação” Chapter in Políticas Sociais— Acompanhamento e Análise 13:155–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, Marcus André. 2007. “The Politics of Service Delivery Reform: Improving Basic Education in Brazil.” In Shanta Devarajan and Ingrid Widlund, eds. The Politics of Service Delivery in Democracies: Better Access for the Poor. Stockholm: EGDI, Ministry for Foreign Affairs. pp. 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, Marcos. 2001. “Descentralização do Ensino Fundamental: Avaliação de resultados do FUNDEF.” Planejamento e Políticas Públicas 24:27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho, Naércio. 2007. “Os determinantes das matrículas no Ensino Fundamental e Médio.” Presentation Prepared for the PNAD-CGEE Conference, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho, Naércio, and Elaine Pazello. 2004. “Evaluating the Effects of FUNDEF on Wages and Test Scores in Brazil.” Working Paper. University of São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério da Educação. 2007. SAEB-2005 primeiros resultados: Médias de desempenho do SAEB 2005 em perspectiva comparada. Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonneti, Eliana. 2005. “Por uma nova escola” Desafios de Desenvolvimento IPEA, PNUD (UNDP), 14th Ed. January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, Sergei. 2006. “Aprendizado e seleção: uma análise da evolução educacional brasileira de acordo com uma perspectiva de ciclo de vida.” Texto para Discussão No. 1185. Brasília, Brazil: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2007. Edstats. Available at http://devdata.worldbank.org/edstats/query/default.htm accessed on April 15, 2007.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Joseph L. Love and Werner Baer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arends-Kuenning, M. (2009). A Report Card for Lula: Progress in Education. In: Love, J.L., Baer, W. (eds) Brazil under Lula. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618374_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics