Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

President Franklin D. Roosevelt read his message to Congress inside his rail car only after it pulled out of Charleston, West Virginia, and rolled along the Kanawha River on September 3, 1940. He waited for the newspapermen traveling with him to file into his small sitting room that normally sat seven or eight comfortably but now had to accommodate twenty. By all accounts, the air was thick with expectation and the U.S. president reveled in the history of the moment. His first words were to say that he was about to announce the most important event in the defense of the United States since Thomas Jefferson’s purchase of Louisiana. He grinned at his captive audience—“flourishing his ivory cigaret [sic] holder, professorial, relishing the historicity of the scene”—and told those gathered that the United States would send fifty aged destroyers to embattled Britain in exchange for base sites in the Western Hemisphere.2 The House of Representatives would, he said, be informed of the deal in twenty-two minutes time. As no appropriations were necessary, the president maintained that he did not need Congressional approval. “What electrified the crowded roomful of correspondents,” Time Magazine reported, “was the audacity with which the deal was consummated: it would be presented to Congress for approval. A Congressional veto was out of the question. Congress was being told about it as a fait accompli.”3

Some future painter of historical canvases, some Trumbull or Carpenter or Constantino Brumidi, seeking to record the epochal in the American story, may find worthy of his brush the press conference at which President Roosevelt read his Congressional message on the Anglo-American exchange of destroyers for air and naval bases. The scene was informal—the sitting room of a railway car, the President in suit of blue, his cigarette in the familiar ivory holder, the reporters around him, some sitting at his feet—yet present were the very stuff and drama of the historic moment. Whether for good or ill, the message revealed the isolationism that had dominated American thinking for two decades had been discarded, and the United States in the name of national defense had turned down a road that, whatever its ruts, bog holes or thank-you-mams, pointed toward greater influence and greater power. Other generations would probably have called it the road of destiny, “manifest destiny.”

Francis Brown, The New York Times (September 15, 1940)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Francis Brown, “For America the Horizons Widen,” New York Times (September 15, 1940), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “The Big Deal,” Time Magazine (September 16, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanson W. Baldwin, “Problems of Defending Hemisphere Are Many,” New York Times (January 2, 1940), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stetson Conn and Byron Fairchild, The Framework of Hemisphere Defense (Washington, DC: Center of Military History of the U.S. Army, 1958), 22; Stetson Conn, Rose C. Engelman, and Byron Fairchild, Guarding the United States and Its Outposts (Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 1964), 391–393.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mark A. Stoler, Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Grand Alliance and US Strategy in World War II (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conn, Engelman, and Fairchild, Guarding the United States, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Major, “The Navy Plans for War, 1937–41,” in Kenneth J. Hagan, ed., In Peace and War: Interpretation of American Naval History, 1775–1978 (Westport: Greenwood Press), 237.

    Google Scholar 

  8. “For Our Defense,” New York Times (September 8, 1940), 73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donald A. Yerxa, “The United States and the Caribbean, 1914–1941,” in Daniel Masterson, ed., Naval History: The Sixth Symposium of the United States Naval Academy (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1987), 257.

    Google Scholar 

  10. “The Strategic Geography of the Caribbean Sea,” Time Magazine (July 29, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A National Geographic Society bulletin was reproduced in “U.S. Defence Bases in the Atlantic Number Four,” The Royal Gazette and Colonist Daily (October 31, 1940), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Major, “The Navy Plans for War,” 243. These fears were realized after the outbreak of war in 1939. Germany’s mastery of the skies enabled it to invade and quickly subdue Poland in September 1939, neutral Norway and Denmark in April 1940; Holland, Belgium and France in May—June, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fitzroy Andre Baptiste, “The British Grant of Air and Naval Facilities to the United States in Trinidad, St. Lucia and Bermuda in 1939,” Caribbean Studies 16, 2 (1976), 5–9; also see his book, War, Cooperation, and Conflict: The European Possessions in the Caribbean, 1939–1945 (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Six weeks after the Munich settlement of appeasement, Roosevelt declared that the United States must be prepared to resist an attack on the Western Hemisphere “from the North Pole to the South Pole, including all of North America and South America.” Conn and Fairchild, The Framework of Hemisphere Defense, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Major, “The Navy Plans for War,” 250.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Purchase ofAllied Islands Near Canal Is Favored by Voters, Gallup Survey Finds,” New York Times (June 14, 1940), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prescott Childs, U.S. Foreign Service, Barbados, to John Hickerson, State Department, June 24, 1940, RG 49 Secretary of State Decimal Files, 1940–49. 8440.01/6–2440, Box 5062. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Francis Brown, “For America the Horizons Widen,” New York Times (15 September 1940), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donald A. Yerxa, “The United States and the Caribbean, 1914–41,” in Daniel Masterson, ed., Naval History: The Sixth Symposium of the United States Navrxl Academy (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1987), 256.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mary Renda, Taking Haiti: Military Occupation and the Culture of U.S. Imperialism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Francis Brown, “For America the Horizons Widen,” New York Times (September 15, 1940), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stuart Creighton Miller, “Benevolent Assimilation: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quoted in Gertrude C. Bussey, President, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, December 17, 1940, in RG 59 Decimal File, 1940–44, 811.34544/620. Box 3790, NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charles A. Petioni, Chairman, Caribbean Union, “West Indian View,” New York Times (19 January 1941), E9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. President Roosevelt was quoted in the Journal, a U.S. Women’s Magazine, as saying that he did not covet the base colonies. He wanted bases, not headaches: “Trinidad? No thanks. What a problem you have there—what a scrambled population … What an ethnic potpourri you have there! No thank you.” He dismissed any designs on Newfoundland because it was a “bankrupt colony” and on Bermuda because it was already an American resort whose wealthy visitors enjoyed vacationing under a different flag. Quoted in “U.S. Does Not Want to Rule Trinidad: ‘Ethnic Potpourri’” Trinidad Guardian (August 25, 1942), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Franklin D. Roosevelt Memorandum, August 2,1940, File: Navy Destroyers and Naval Bases, 1940 part 1, Box 62 (PSF). Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library (FDR Library). Hyde Park, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  27. “Leahy Insists on New Bases in Caribbean as ‘Almost’ Essential to Panama Defense,” New York Times (August 19, 1940), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joseph Kennedy to Secretary of State, August 15, 1940, RG 59, Decimal File: 1940–44, 811.34544. Box 3786, NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Secretary of State to William H. King, Senator, Appendix from King, “A Proposal for the Immediate Leasing of Military Bases in Certain Territories of Great Britain in the Western Hemisphere …” RG 59. Decimal File: 1940–44, 811.34544/8, Box 3786, NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Joseph Kennedy to Secretary of State, August 29, 1940, RG 59, Decimal File: 1940–44, 811.34544/26/9. Box 3786. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cordell Hull, “Memorandum of Conversation,” “U.S.-British Negotiations Regarding Exchange of Naval Bases and Destroyers,” August 25, 1940, RG 59. Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/10. Box 3786. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lord Lothian to Cordell Hull, 25 August 1940, RG 59. Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/121/10. Box 3786. NARA

    Google Scholar 

  33. “For Our Defense,” New York Times (September 8, 1940), 73.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Editorial, “Ships from America,” London Times (September 4, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eric Williams, Forged from the Love of Liberty: Selected Speeches of Dr. Eric Williams (Trinidad: Longman Caribbean, 1981), xxv.

    Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. Embassy in Great Britain to the Secretary of State, 6 September 1940, RG 59. Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/35. Box 3786. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boersen Zeitung quoted in telegram from U.S. Embassy in Great Britain to the Secretary of State, September 4, 1940, RG 59. Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/17. Box 3786. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  38. U.S. Embassy in Great Britain to the Secretary of State, September 6, 1940, RG 59. Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/35. Box 3786. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Canadian Press wire story, “Anglo-U.S. Deal Gives Axis Powers Concern,” The Royal Gazette and Colonist Daily (Thursday, September 19, 1940), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Department of State, Division of the American Republics, “Reaction to the Destroyers-Naval Bases Trade in Latin America,” September 10, 1940, RG 59. Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/92. Box 3786. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  41. The newspaper was quick to note that the islands lay just 666 nautical miles from New York City, or “a three hour flight for bombing planes.” It was also noted the islands “almost” lay on the Great Circle Route from Europe to the north of Europe; that it was an important clipper station; and commanded important North Atlantic sea lanes. “U.S. Bases Bring the Colony into News,” The Royal Gazette and Colonist Daily (September 11, 1940), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stanley Truman Brooks, “Gap in Defence Closed by Newfoundland Base,” The Evening Telegram, St. John’s Newfoundland (Tuesday, February 18, 1941), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. It was also noted that the German dirigible Hindenburg had flown the Great Circle Route over Newfoundland and that: “Sometimes the liner would hang nearly motionless over the headlands, provoking the belief in many circles that photographs of the island were being taken.”

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alexander Zeidenfelt, “The Trinidad Base in World War II.” File: “Trinidad, BWI (1942–52). Box 84. Naval Historical Centre. Washington Navy Yard.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Harold Denny, “We Begin to Man Our New Bases,” New York Times (January 19, 1941), E6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Editorial, “Our New Bases,” New York Times (September 5, 1940), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 28 August 1940. The Joint Planning Committee to Chief of Naval Operations and the Chief of Staff of the Army. File 2. Box 5. John W. Greenslade Papers. Library of Congress (LoC). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hanson W. Baldwin, “U.S. Seen As Gainer in Destroyers Deal,” New York Times (September 4, 1940), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Charlie Whitham, “On Dealing with Gangsters: The Limits of British ‘Generosity’ in the Leasing of Bases to the United States, 1940–41,” Diplomacy & Stcttecraft 7, 3 (November 1996), 591.

    Google Scholar 

  50. The Joint Planning Committee to Chief of Naval Operations and the Chief of Staff to the Army, August 28, 1940, File 2, Box 5, John W. Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Born on January 11, 1880 in Bellevue, Ohio, Greenslade had served on a cruiser during the Cuban campaign of the Spanish American War. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, and served in the Philippines from 1899 until 1902. He later taught electrical engineering, ordinance and gunnery at the Naval Academy before being given command of large surface vessels throughout the 1920s, including the battleship Pennsylvania. He commanded the battleship division of the U.S. fleet, and the submarine force, before being named the senior member of the President’s Board of Selection. John Willis Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Born in 1887 in York, Pennsylvania, Jacob Devers would become best known for commanding the Allied Sixth Army Group in Europe later in the war. This field artillery specialist was a strong strategist who had a profound influence on the Board of Experts deliberations. He was promoted to Major General in October 1940. While the work of the Board was watched closely by the world’s media at the time, it is indicative of its fading importance that the substantial biographical descriptions of Jacob L. Devers posted on the Web sites of the Eisenhower Presidential Library (where his records are kept) and Arlington Cemetery (where he is interred) fail to mention his work on the Board of Experts in 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  53. The other members were Captain R.S. Crenshaw, U.S. Navy; Captain D.W. Rose, Supply Corps, U.S. Navy; Lt. Colonel H.J. Maloney, Field Artillery, U.S. Army; Lt. Colonel J. D. Arthur, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army; Commander K.B. Bragg, Civil Engineer Corps, U.S. Navy; Commander C.T. Durgin, U.S. Navy; Commander H. Biesemeier, U.S. Navy (Aide to President and Legal Advisor to the Board); Ltn. Colonel O.T. Pfeiffer, U.S. Marine Corps; and Major Townsend Griffis, Air Corps, U.S. Army. File 2. Members, Advisers and Aides on the President’s Board of Naval Experts. Box 5. John W. Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  54. January 6, 1941. From Board to Survey and Report on Adequacy and Future Development of the Naval Shore Establishment to the Secretary of the Navy. File 1:Greenslade Board Report. Box 196. Strategic Plans Division— Records. Post-War Planning and Sea Frontier Sections (Series XIV). Naval Historical Center (NHC). Washington Navy Yard. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  55. United States. Building the Navy’s Bases in World War II: Hisory of the Bureau of Yards and Docks and he Civil Engineer Corps, 1940–1946, Volume 2 (Washington, DC: Government Printing, 1947). File: Trinidad, BWI (1942–52). Box 84. NHC.

    Google Scholar 

  56. November 8, 1940. Outline of Local Defenses for Bases Acquired from Great Britain in the Caribbean Area and British Guiana. File 2. Box 5. Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Memo (1) COS (40) 704, War Cabinet, Chiefs of Staff Committee. U.S. Bases in the Western Atlantic Report, 4 September 1940 meeting, CAB 98/6, War Cabinet. Committee on U.S. Bases, USB (40) and (41) Series. Minutes and Memos. PRO

    Google Scholar 

  58. “Experts Make Fast Start on Survey of U.S. Air & Naval Base Sites Here,” Royal Gazette and Colonist Daily (September 6, 1940), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  59. File 2. Department of Navy. General Board. Washington. Box 5. Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  60. John O’Reilly, “Long Tranquil Bermuda Amazed to Find Itself a Defence Bastion,” The Royal Gazette and Daily Colonist 27 (December 1940), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Memo (1) COS (40) 704, War Cabinet, Chiefs of Staff Committee. U.S. Bases in the Western Atlantic Report, 4 September 1940 meeting, CAB 98/6, War Cabinet. Committee on U.S. Bases, USB (40) and (41) Series. Minutes and Memos. PRO.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Conn, Engelman and Fairchild, Guarding the United States and Its Outposts, 368.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Harold Denny, “We Begin to Man Our New Bases,” New York Times (19 January 1941), E6.

    Google Scholar 

  64. September 17, 1940. Harold B. Quarton, American Consul General to Secretary of State. Box 34. RG 84. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  65. File 6: Newfoundland. Box 6. Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rear Admiral J.W. Greenslade to Governor of Trinidad, October 10, 1940, Box 1, RG 84. Port of Spain (Trinidad, BWI) Consulate, NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  67. May 9, 1951. Brief History of Trinidad. Box 10. Field Liaison and Records Section. Base Maintenance Division, 1930–1965. NHC.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Outline of Local Defenses for Bases Acquired from Great Britain in the Caribbean Area and British Guiana, 8 November 1940, File 2, Box 5, John W. Greenslade Papers, LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Fitzroy André Baptiste, War, Cooperation and Conflict: The European Possessions in the Caribbean, 1939–1945 (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Governor of Trinidad to the Secretary of State, January 22, 1944, DO 35/1736. PRO.

    Google Scholar 

  71. U.S. Embassy, London, January 8, 1941, RG 59. Decimal Files, 1940–44. 811.34544/423. Box 3789. NARA. Questions about the legality and morality of the deal were raised by the U.S.-based West Indian National Council and by the Inter-Caribbean Labor Party. W.A. Domingo, President, West Indian Council to FDR, 27 December 1940, RG 59: Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/621. Box 3790, NARA. The Inter Caribbean Labor Party, 25—Caribbean Labor Party went so far as to say that the acquisition of the bases was “unlawful.” February 1941, RG 59: Decimal File, 1940–44. 811.34544/641. Box 3790, NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Alexander Zeidenfelt, “The Trinidad Base in World War II,” File: Trinidad, BWI (1942–52), Box 84. NHC.

    Google Scholar 

  73. “Base Experts Fly over Caribbean,” New York Times (October 21, 1940), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Monograph Histories of USN Overseas Bases, Volume 1 (Atlantic Area), 1951–1954. Box 10. Field Liaison and Records Section. Base Maintenance Division, 1930–1965. NHC.

    Google Scholar 

  75. The Board had difficulty selecting base sites in the Bahamas. At first, the Board recommended building a seaplane base and landing field on Mayaguana Island, one of the outer islands, but President Franklin Roosevelt overruled the decision during his inspection trip in December 1940. The facilities were built on Great Exuma instead.

    Google Scholar 

  76. United States. Building the Navys Bcases in World War II: History of the Bureau of Yards and Docks and the Civil Engineer Corps, 1940–46, Volume 2 (Washington, DC: Government Printing, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Fitzroy Andre Baptiste, War, Cooperation and Conflict: The European Possessions in the Caribbean, 1939–1945 (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  78. November 8, 1940. Outline of Local Defenses for Bases Acquired from Great Britain in the Caribbean Area and British Guiana. File 2. Box 5. Greenslade Papers. LoC.

    Google Scholar 

  79. In St. Lucia, 90 police and a part-time militia of 160 were armed with rifles and a few machine guns. Antigua had 60 police and a “volunteer” force of 90 white settlers. There were only 3 machine guns and 260 rifles on the island. Conn, Engelman and Fairchild, Guarding the United States and Its Outposts, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Canada sent troops to Jamaica in May 1940 (“Y” Force), to the Bahamas in June 1942 (“N” Force), and to Bermuda in October 1942 (“B” Force). There was also a small detachment sent to British Guiana. These units were made available for aid to the civil power (internal security). January 22, 1946. Memorandum. Lieutenant General Charles Foulkes. Re: Query from Canadian Press. File 821-A-406. Volume 2802. RG 25. National Archives of Canada (NAC).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Conn, Engelman, and Fairchild, Guarding the United States, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  82. September 2, 1941. British Joint Staff Mission in Washington. U.S. Bases-Defence Questions. Note by the Joint Secretaries. Enclosures I, II, and III. File 821-B-40C. Volume 2802. RG 25. NAC.

    Google Scholar 

  83. November 14, 1942. Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet and Chief of Naval Operations to Commander of Caribbean Sea Frontier. “Command Relations in Jamaica, BWI.” File: 4 Caribbean Sea Frontier. Box 210. Post-War Planning and Sea Frontier Sections (Series XIV). Strategic Plans Division—Records. NHC.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Robert P. Patterson, Assistant Secretary of War, to President, October 8, 1940, File “War Department, June-December 1940,” OF 25, Box 5, Caroline Ware Collection, Box 8. FDR Library.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ulysses Lee, The Employment of Negro Troops (Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, 1966), 429.

    Google Scholar 

  86. There is abundant proof that such a policy was maintained. See, for example, Conn and Fairchild, The Western Hemisphere, 407–408.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Eisenhower was quoted as saying this in March 1942 in Graham Smith, When Jim Crow Met John Bull: Black American Soldiers in World War II Britain (London, 1987), 27.

    Google Scholar 

  88. The 99th Coastal Artillery unit was the only African-American formation to be deployed in the base colonies. Their arrival in Trinidad in May 1942 came despite the protests of the colonial administration. Susan Campbell, “‘En’less Pressure’: The Struggle of a Caribbean Working-Class in their International Trinidad, 1919–1956” (Ph.D. thesis, Canada: Queen’s University, 1995), 266. See also Annette Palmer, “Black American Soldiers in Trinidad, 1942–44,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 14, 3 (1986), 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Annette Palmer, “The Politics of Race and War: Black American Soldiers in the Caribbean Theater during the Second World War,” Military Affairs 47, 2 (April 1983), 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  90. U.S. Consul General Sidney A. Belovsky to William P. Snow, Assistant Chief, Division of British Commonwealth Affairs, 22 September 1949, File 142–52: Newfoundland Bases (General) (September 1949), Box 22, RG 59: Secretary of State, Permanent Joint Board of Defense, American Section, NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Foster Dulles, Secretary of State to President Franklin Roosevelt, August 7, 1943. Decimal File, 1940–44, Confidential 811.34544. Box C82. RG 59. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Memorandum of Conversation, “Stationing of Puerto Rican or negro troops in Caribbean islands,” Department of State, October 29, 1943. Decimal File, 1940–44, Confidential 811.34544. Box C82. RG 59. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Joseph T. McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, to Field Marshall Sir John Dill, Combined Chiefs of Staff Building, October 28, 1943. Decimal File, 1940–44, Confidential 811.34544. Box C82. RG 59. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

  94. A.A. Berle, Jr., to Mr. Hickerson, November 2, 1943. Decimal File, 1940–44, Confidential 811.34544. Box C82. RG 59. NARA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Steven High

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

High, S. (2009). The United States and Hemispheric Defense. In: Base Colonies in the Western Hemisphere, 1940–1967. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618046_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics