Abstract
To assert the primacy of politics in the incorporation periods of Egypt and Mexico would be to state the obvious. The political struggles of the pre- and postrevolutionary periods are critical to understanding the origins, profile, and support bases of the Mexican and Egyptian states. Different political rationales drove the processes of regime formation and coalition building in the two countries. Establishing control over the lower classes involves political mobilization, which can be violent and destabilizing, but the successful institutionalization of mass support increases state builders’ capacity to consolidate their rule and policy agenda. Regime elites in Mexico and Egypt sought to limit the duration of mass mobilization, direct it through approved organizational channels, and guide social groups toward different elite-defined objectives. How state elites directed mass participation would have a powerful effect on the institutional profiles of the postrevolutionary authoritarian regimes.
I don’t believe the 1952 revolution had any positive features, since democracy is still missing. Even its social reforms led to the failure of our economy. The greatest failure of the revolution is the lack of democracy, which I believe led to our defeat in 1967. Egypt has never experienced a democratic government from 1952 until now … The revolution embraced the slogan “raise your head, my brother, for the age of oppression is over,” but it replaced it with the heavy foot of Abdel Nasser that kept people’s heads down.
—Awad El-Morr1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Mason Hart, Revolutionary Mexico: The Coming and Process of the Mexican Revolutio (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987), 132.
Rodney D. Anderson, Outcasts in Their Own Land: Mexican Industrial Workers, 1906–191 (DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1976).
Gilbert M. Joseph, Revolution from Without: Yucatan, Mexico, and the United States, 1880–192 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988).
Ruth Collier, The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexic (Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California, 1992), 26.
See Arnaldo Córdova, “En una época de crisis (1928–1934),” in La clase obrera en la historia de Mexic (Mexico City, Mexico: Siglo XXI, 1980), 48.
Nora Hamilton, The Limits of State Autonomy: Post-Revolutionary Mexic (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982), 273.
Ben Fallaw, Cardenas Compromised: The Failure of Reform in Postrevolutionary Yucata (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001), 114–16.
See Pablo Gonzalez Casanova, El estado y los partidos politicos en Mexic (Mexico City: Ediciones Era, 1982).
Barry Carr, El Movimiento Obrero y la politica en Mexic, vol. 1 (Mexico City, Mexico: SepSetentas, 1976), 203.
See Joel Beinin and Zachary Lockman, Workers on the Nile: Nationalism, Communism, Islam and the Egyptian Working Class, 1882–195 (Princeton University Press, 1987).
See Maurice Deeb, “Labor and Politics in Egypt: 1919–1939,” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studie 10 (1979): 187–203.
Joel Beinin, “The Communist Movement and Nationalist Political Discourse in Nasirist Egypt,” Middle East Journa 41, no. 4 (Autumn 1987), 568–84.
P. J. Vatikiotis, “Egypt’s Political Experience: The 1952 Revolution as an Expression of the Historical Heritage,” in Egypt from Monarchy to Republic: A Reassessment of Revolution and Chang, ed. Shimon Shamir (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995), 120.
Patrick O’Brien, The Revolution in Egyp’s Economic System: From Private Enterprise to Socialism, 1952–196 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1966), 72–73.
See James B. Mayfield, “Agricultural Cooperatives: Continuity and Change in Rural Egypt,” in Egypt from Monarchy to Republic
See Richard Adams, Development and Social Change in Rural Egyp (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1986), chap. 7.
Karima Korayen, “The Agricultural Output Pricing Policy and the Implicit Taxation of Agricultural Income,” in The Political Economy of Income Distribution in Egyp, ed. Gouda Abdel Khalek and Robert Tignor (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1982), 165.
Howeida Adly, al-Ummal wa al-Siyyas (Cairo: Al-Ahali, 1993).
See Beinin and Lockman, Workers on the Nile: Nationalism, Communism, Islam, and the Egyptian Working Class, 1882–195 (Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo Press, 1987), chap. 13.
O’Brien, Revolution in Egyp’s Economic Syste, 68.
Robert Tignor, “Foreign Capital and Foreign Communities and the Egyptian Revolution of 1952,” in Egypt From Monarchy to Republic
See John Waterbury, The Egypt of Nasser and Sadat: The Political Economy of Two Regime (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).
See Dag Macleod, Downsizing the State: Privatization and the Limits of NeoLiberal Reform in Mexic (University Park: Penn State University Press, 2004), 54–59.
Nora Hamilton, The Limits of State Autonomy: Post Revolutionary Mexic (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982), 71.
Raymond Baker, Sadat and After: Struggles For Egyp’s Political Sou (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 84.
Nazih Ayubi, Bureaucracy and Politics in Contemporary Egyp (London: Ithaca, 1980).
Tareq al-Bishri, Democracy and the July Revolutio (Beirut: Dar ash-Shuruq, 1986).
Joel Gordon, Nasse’s Blessed Movement: Egyp’s Free Officers and the July Revolutio (New York: Oxford University Press 1992), 62.
See Eric Davis, Challenging Colonialism: Bank Misr and Egyptian Industrialization, 1920–194 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).
Ilkay Sunar, “The Politics of State Interventionism in ‘Populist’ Egypt and Turkey,” in Developmentalism and Beyond: Society and Politics in Egypt and Turke, ed. Saad Eddin Ibrahim et al. (Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 1994), 110.
Georges Vaucher, Gamal Abdel Nasser et son equipe: Les années ’humiliation et la conquete du pouvoi (Julliard, 1959).
See Ignacio Klich, “Towards an Arab-Latin American Bloc: The Genesis of Argentine-Middle East Relations: Jordan, 1945–54.” Middle Eastern Studie 3, no. 31 (1995): 550–72.
See Juan Archibaldo Lanus, De Chapultepec al Beagle: Politica exterior argentina, 1945–198 (Buenos Aires: Emece Editores, 1984).
Abdal Mughni Said, “Safahaat Majhula Min Tarikh al-Haraka al-Niqabiya,” al‘Ama 236 (January 1983), cited in Robert Bianchi, Unruly Corporatism: Association Life in Twentieth-Century Egyp (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 37.
Christian Buchrucker, “Interpretations of Peronism: Old Frameworks and New Perspectives,” in Peronism and Argentin, ed. James P. Brennan (Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources, 1998); Rogelio Garcia Lupo, “Generales Argentinos entre Francia y EE.UU, 1955–1965,” Clarin Suplement, April 22, 2001.
Edy Kaufman et al., Israeli-Latin American Relation (Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1979), 49.
Philippe Schmitter, Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazi (Stanford University Press, 1971).
Nathan J. Brown, “Nasserism’s Legal Legacy: Successibility, Accountability and Authoritarianism,” in Rethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern Egyp, ed. Elie Podeh and Onn Winckler (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2004), 130. See also Misako Ikeda, “Toward the Democratization of Public Education: The Debate in Late Parliamentary Egypt, 1943–52,” in Re-Envisioning Egypt 1919–195, ed. Arthur Goldschmidt et al. (American University of Cairo Press, 2005).
Doreen Wariner, Land Reform and Development in the Middle East: A Study of Egypt, Syria and Ira, 2nd ed. (London: Oxford University Press, 1962).
M. Riad El Ghonamy, Affluence and Poverty in the Middle Eas (London: Routledge, 1998), 160.
Samir Radwan, Agrarian reform and Rural Poverty: Egypt, 1952–197 (Geneva: International Labor Organization, 1977).
Robert Springborg, “Rolling Back Egypt’s Agrarian Reform,” Middle East Repor 166 (September-October 1990), 28–30; Paul Rivlin, “Nasser’s Egypt and Park’s Korea: A Comparison of Their economic Achievements,” in Rethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern Egyp, ed. Elie Pdeh and Onn Winckler (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2004), 264–81.
Dani Rodrik, “Getting Interventions Right: How South Korea and Taiwan Grew Rich?” Economic Polic 10, no. 2 (April 2, 1995): 55–107.
Terry Lynn Karl, The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-State (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).
David W. Lesch, “Nasser and the United States: Enemy or Friend,” in Rethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern Egyp, ed. Elie Pdeh and Onn Winckler (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2004), 208.
Paul Rivlin, “Nasser’s Egypt and Park’s Korea: A Comparison of their Economic Achievements,” in Rethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern Egyp, ed. Elie Pdeh and Onn Winckler (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2004).
Copyright information
© 2009 Hishaam D. Aidi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aidi, H.D. (2009). The Founding Moment. In: Redeploying the State. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617902_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617902_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-62137-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61790-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)