Skip to main content

Social Cognition in Spectating

  • Chapter
Engaging Audiences

Part of the book series: Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance ((CSLP))

Abstract

We are social animals. Because evolution has equipped our species with more sensitivity to the needs and emotions of others than is evident in other mammals, we carry these cognitive capabilities with us into theatrical viewing. As we will see, our social cognition builds upon and overlaps with the general cognitive processes examined in the previous chapter. In particular, the visuomotor representations mentioned previously provide spectators with the ability to “read the minds” of actor/characters, to intuit their beliefs, intentions, and emotions by watching their motor actions. This mode of engagement, also known as empathy, extends to our understanding of actors’ use of props and even their gestures and spoken language. Empathy is not an emotion, but it readily leads viewers to emotional engagements. In addition to experiencing unconsciously the six basic emotions, spectators often gain a conscious awareness of their emotional commitments, which encourages them to form sympathetic or antipathetic attachments to certain actor/characters. As spectators, we want to be moved to emotional extremes; laughter and tears provide a kind of catharsis that is good for our bodies. Chapter 2 concludes with an overview of cognitive evolution that places these modes of engagement in evolutionary perspective and prepares for the discussion of cultural-historical cognition that follows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Paula M. Niedenthal, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Francois Ric, and Silvia Krauth-Gruber, “Embodiment in the Acquisition and Use of Emotion Knowledge,” in Emotion and Consciousness, ed. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal, and Piotr Winkielman ( New York: Guilford Press, 2005 ), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Hatfield, J.T. Cacioppo, and R.L. Rapson, Emotional Contagion ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994 ), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert M. Gordon, “Sympathy, Simulation, and the Impartial Spectator,” in Mind and Morals: Essays on Cognitive Science and Ethics, ed. Larry May, Marilyn Friedman, and Andy Clark ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996 ), 168.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert M. Gordon, Georg Vielmetter, David Henderson and Terence Horgan, and Hans Herbert Kogler in Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences, ed. Hans Herbert Kogler and Karsten R. Steuber ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000 )

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael H. Thaut, “Rhythm, Human Temporality, and Brain Function,” in Musical Communication, ed. Dorothy Miell, Raymond MacDonald, and David J. Hargreaves ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 ), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caryl Churchill, Top Girls ( New York: Samuel French, 1982 ), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amelia Howe Kritzer, The Plays of Caryl Churchill: Theatre of Empowerment ( Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 1991 )

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phyllis R. Randall, Caryl Churchill: A Casebook ( New York: Garland Publishing, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simon Baron-Cohen, Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind ( Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995 ), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baron-Cohen’s “Autism and the Origins of Social Neuroscience,” in The CognitiveNeuroscience of Social Behavior, ed. A. Easton and N.J. Emery (Hove and New York: Psychology Press, 2005), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oliver Sacks, An Anthropologist on Mars ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995 ), 259–260.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vittorio Gallese, “The ‘Shared Manifold’ Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8, 5–7 (2001): 36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Nichols and S. Stich, Mindreading ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003 )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. See Vittorio Gallese, Christian Keysers, and Giacomo Rizzolatti, “A Unifying View of the Basis of Social Cognition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jean Decety and Philip L. Jackson, “A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15, 2 (2006): 54–58

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bernard Beckerman, The Dynamics of Drama: Theory and Method of Analysis ( New York: Knopf, 1970 ), 149.

    Google Scholar 

  17. David Krasner, “Empathy and Theater,” in Staging Philosophy, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See James J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception ( Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ulric Neisser, Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology ( San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1976 ), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Mark H. Johnson and John Morton, Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bertolt Brecht, “The Modern Theatre is the Epic Theatre,” in Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, ( New York: Hill and Wang, 1964 ), 37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Susan Feagin, Reading with Feeling: The Aesthetics of Appreciation ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996 ), 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andras Wohlschlager and Harold Bekkering, “The Role of Objects in Imitation,” in Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, ed. Maxim Stamenov and Vittorio Gallese (Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2002 ), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ellen Dissanayake, Art and Intimacy: How the Arts Began ( Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000 ), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brian Boyd, “Evolutionary Theories of Art,” in The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative, ed. Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson ( Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2005 ), 164.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vittorio Gallese and George Lakoff, “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge,” Cognitive Neuropsychology 21 (2005): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cynthia Moss and Martyn Colbeck, Echo of the Elephants: The Story of an Elephant Family ( New York: William Morrow, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. Alan Sheridan ( New York: Norton, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity ( New York: Routledge, 1990 )

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” ( New York: Routledge, 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Andrew Sofer, The Stage Life of Props ( Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003 ), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Joseph R. Roach, It ( Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2007 ), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Rhonda K. Garelick, Electric Salome: Loie Fuller’s Performance of Modernism (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007 ).

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Ron Jenkins, Acrobats of the Soul: Comedy and Virtuosity in Contemporary American Theatre ( New York: Theatre Communications Group, 1988 ), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stanton B. Garner, Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994 ), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See Brian Butterworth and Uri Hadar, “Gesture, Speech, and Computational Stages: A Reply to McNeill,” Psychological Review 96 (1989): 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. David McNeill, Gesture and Thought ( Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005 ), 4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. See Philip B. Zarrilli, The Kathakali Complex: Actor, Performance, Structure ( New Delhi: Abhinav Press, 1984 ).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tennessee Williams, A Streetcar Named Desire ( 1947; New York: Penguin Putnam, 1975 ), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jaak Panksepp, Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1998 ), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Antonio R. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness ( New York: Harcourt Brace, 1999 ), 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., Embodiment and Cognitive Science ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 ), 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See P. Ekman, R.W. Levinson, and W.B. Friesen, “Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishing Among Emotions,” Science 221 (1983): 1208–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Paul Ekman, “Strong Evidence for Universals in Facial Expressions: A Reply to Russell’s Mistaken Critique,” Psychological Bulletin 115 (1994): 268–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Scott D. Lipscomb and David E. Tolchinsky summarize this research in “The Role of Music Communication in Cinema,” in Musical Communication,1997 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Patrik N. Juslin, “From Mimesis to Catharsis: Expression, Perception, and Induction of Emotion in Music,” in Musical Communication,1805, 94, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jill Dolan, Utopia in Performance: Finding Hope at the Theatre ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005 ), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jeffrey S. Ravel, The Contested Parterre: Public Theater and French Political Culture, 1680–1791 ( Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1999 ), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  49. David S. Miall, Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies ( New York: Peter Lang, 2006 ).

    Google Scholar 

  50. George Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Gregory L. Murphy, The Big Book of Concepts ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002 )

    Google Scholar 

  52. Eleanor Rosch, “Human Categorization,” in Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, ed. N. Warren ( London: Academic Press, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bruce McConachie, American Theater in the Culture of the Cold War: Producing and Contesting Containment, 1947–1962 ( Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 2003 ), 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Philip C. Kolin, Williams: A Streetcar Named Desire, Plays in Production ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 ), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Robert R. Provine, Laughter: A Scientific Investigation ( New York: Viking, 2000 ), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Robert L. Latta, The Basic Humor Process: A Cognitive-Shift Theory and the Case Against Incongruity ( Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999 ), 44.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. C. Walter Hodges, Enter the Whole Army: A Pictorial Study of Shakespearean Staging, 1576–1616 ( Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999 ), 140–146

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gail Kern Paster, Humoring the Body: Emotions and The Shakespearean Stage ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004 ), 212–218.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Joanna Bourke, Fear: A Cultural History ( London: Virago Press, 2005 ).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Merlin Donald, Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991 )

    Google Scholar 

  61. Peter J. Richerson and Robert Boyd, Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution ( Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005 ).

    Google Scholar 

  62. See Terrence W. Deacon, The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain ( New York: W.W. Norton, 1997 ), 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Bruce McConachie

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McConachie, B. (2008). Social Cognition in Spectating. In: Engaging Audiences. Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617025_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics