Skip to main content

Abstract

Cocteau’s encoded representation of nonnormative sexuality and his plea for tolerance in The Infernal Machine have gone undetected for another reason as well: the narrative mode employed, that is, the fantastic. The fantastic in its various manifestations takes the center stage, to the delight of the audience, and overshadows the deeper import of Cocteau’s strategy and techniques in the play. John Clum affirms that, with regard to Tennessee Williams and William Inge, “it is their rich response to the closet and their mastery of its evasions and projections that made [them], in differing degrees, successful writers.”2 For Cocteau, this “rich response” was double-sided: while it did bring him glory, it sometimes diverted the reader or spectator’s gaze from the “invisible” to the visible. He repeatedly complained in his private journals about the public’s inability to perceive his invisible “truth,” all the while inadvertently or perhaps not, contributing to this predicament.

Alice laughed. “There is no use trying,” she said: “one can’t believe impossible things.”

“I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the queen.

—Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass (London: Penguin, 1973), 257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eric Rabkin, The Fantastic in Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976), 20–21;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christine Brooke-Rose, A Rhetoric of the Unreal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a psychoanalytic approach to the fantastic, see Louis Vax, La Séduction de l’étrange (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nancy H. Traill, Possible Worlds of the Fantastic: The Rise of the Paranormal in Literature (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lucie Armitt, Theorising the Fantastic (London: Arnold, 1996), 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Todorov, 25; Brian Attebery, Strategies of Fantasy (Bloomington: Indiana university Press, 1992), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Attebery, 16–17; Colin N. Manlove, Modern Fantasy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hume, 21. See also Patrick Parrinder, “Introduction: Learning from Other Worlds,” in Learning from Other Worlds, ed. Patrick Parrinder (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a detailed discussion of the prevailing symbolists theories on theatre and drama, see Frantisek Deak, Symbolist Theater: The Formation of an Avant-Garde (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. G. Lehmann, The Symbolist Aesthetic in France, 1885–1895 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacques Robichez, Le Symbolisme au théâtre: Lugné-Poe et les débuts de L’ Oeuvre (Paris: L’Arche, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  13. On the production of this play, see also Annette Shandler Levitt, “Jean Cocteau’s Theatre: Idea and Enactment,” Theatre Journal 45, no. 3 (October 1993): 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans, Arthur B. Jean Cocteau and His Films of Orphic Identity (Philadelphia: Art Alliance Press, 1977), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lydia Crowson, The Esthetic of Jean Cocteau (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1978), 151.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jan Hokenson, “Introduction,” in Forms of the Fantastic (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1986), 153.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion (London: Methuen, 1981), 1–91.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. In his article “Le Numéro Barbette,” published in Paris in June 1926 in the Chronique des spectacles, Cocteau paid tribute to “the magic light of the theatre” and the aesthetic pleasure it provides. The article, an aesthetization of a homosexual experience, is considered by critics as Cocteau’s Ars Poetica. See Jennifer Forrest, “Cocteau au cirque: The Poetics of Parade and ‘Le Numéro Barbette,’” Studies in 20th Century Literature 27, no. 1 (Winter 2003): 9–47;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mark Franko, “Where He Danced: Cocteau’s ‘Barbette’ and Ohno’s ‘Water Lilies,’” PMLA 107, no. 3 (May 1992): 594–607;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maité R. Monchal, Le Sacerdoce de la désobeissance. Création et séxualite chez Jean Cocteau. Suivi d’un entretien avec Jean Marais. (Ann Arbor: UMI, 1994), and her Homotextualité: creation et sexualité chez Jean Cocteau (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patrick D. Murphy, “Introduction,” in Staging the Impossible: The Fantastic Mode in Modern Drama, ed. Patrick D. Murphy (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, for example, Bert. O. States, Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theater (Berkeley: University of California, 1985);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stanton B. Garner, Jr., Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  25. On the influence of popular traveling theatres on Cocteau, see Jeremy Cox, “‘Le théâtre forain’: Historical and Stylistic Connections between Parade and Histoire du SoldatMusic and Letters 76, no. 4 (November 1995): 572–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinfield, Alan. “Private Lives/Public Theater: Noel Coward and the Politics of Homosexual Representation.” Representations, no. 36 (Autumn 1991): 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. On theatre and homosexuality, mostly in France, England, and Germany at the end of the nineteenth century, see Laurence Senelick, “The Homosexual as Villain and Victim in Fin-de-Siècle Drama,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 4, no. 2 (October 1993): 201–229; “The Queer Root of Theater,” in The Queerest Art: Essays on Lesbian and Gay Theater, ed. Alisa Solomon and Framji Minwalla (New York: New York University Press, 2002), 21–39; and Ibid., “General Introduction,” 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Irene Eynat-Confino

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eynat-Confino, I. (2008). Visibility, Invisibility, and the Fantastic. In: On the Uses of the Fantastic in Modern Theatre. Palgrave Studies Theatre and Performance History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616967_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics