Abstract
In one of my recent classes, I offered my students a series of slides depicting “upside down” maps of the world.1 The maps showed the Southern Hemisphere at the “top” of the map and the Northern at the “bottom.” The change seemed to transform the importance of continents like South America and Africa (which was also rendered to reflect its true size). I used this tool as a way of disorienting my students comfort with their knowledge. A couple of students were already familiar with the maps and their implications, but the majority were rather perplexed, and then visibly contemplative about their long-assumed understanding of the physical shape of the world. In the class discussion, students (and later the maintenance crew that came in during a class break) offered a few telling comments. One of the first things that most noticed was that (in one of the maps) Australia suddenly seemed to have more global importance based upon its now “prominent” location and “centrality” to the entire world. The “down under” (read: hidden, insignificant, a second thought) was now “up above” (read: visible, important, primary to) the rest of the world. At the same time, the United States—what Americans (and only Americans) think of as the center of the universe suddenly became contextualized. One student remarked that he felt rather uncomfortable that on this upside down map the United States seemed “rather small, pushed over to the corner,” and thus less important.
Question: Mr. President... What do you think tribal sovereignty means in the twenty-first century and how do we resolve conflicts between tribes and the federal and state governments?—Mark Trahant, editorial page editor of The Seattle Post Intelligencer and former president of the Native American Journalists Association.
Answer: Tribal sovereignty means that; it’s sovereign. I mean, you’re a—you’ve been given sovereignty, and you’re viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities.—President Bush, Washington, DC, August 6, 2004.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Berkhofer, Robert. The White Man’s Indian: Images of the American Indian from Columbus to the Present. New York: Knopf, 1979.
Deloria, Philip. Playing Indian. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
Lipsitz, George. The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit From Identity Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998.
News from Native California 19:4 (Summer 2006).
Oliver, Melvin, and Thomas Shapiro. Black Wealth, White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Pearce, Roy Harvey. Savagism and Civilization: A Study of the Indian and American Mind. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1967.
Rosaldo, Renato. Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.
Tsai, Catherine. “Business Profs Rethinking Ethics Classes.” Boston Globe. June 16, 2006.
Tully, James. “The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom.” Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Ed. Duncan Ivison, Paul Patton, and Will Sanders. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Wing, Bob. “‘Educate to Liberate!’: Multiculturalism and the Struggle for Ethnic Studies.” Colorlines 2:2 (Summer 1999): 15–19.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Lisa Guerrero
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnd, N.B. (2008). A New Era for Teaching American Indian Studies. In: Guerrero, L. (eds) Teaching Race in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616950_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616950_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-60800-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61695-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)