Skip to main content

A New Era for Teaching American Indian Studies

  • Chapter
Book cover Teaching Race in the Twenty-First Century
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

In one of my recent classes, I offered my students a series of slides depicting “upside down” maps of the world.1 The maps showed the Southern Hemisphere at the “top” of the map and the Northern at the “bottom.” The change seemed to transform the importance of continents like South America and Africa (which was also rendered to reflect its true size). I used this tool as a way of disorienting my students comfort with their knowledge. A couple of students were already familiar with the maps and their implications, but the majority were rather perplexed, and then visibly contemplative about their long-assumed understanding of the physical shape of the world. In the class discussion, students (and later the maintenance crew that came in during a class break) offered a few telling comments. One of the first things that most noticed was that (in one of the maps) Australia suddenly seemed to have more global importance based upon its now “prominent” location and “centrality” to the entire world. The “down under” (read: hidden, insignificant, a second thought) was now “up above” (read: visible, important, primary to) the rest of the world. At the same time, the United States—what Americans (and only Americans) think of as the center of the universe suddenly became contextualized. One student remarked that he felt rather uncomfortable that on this upside down map the United States seemed “rather small, pushed over to the corner,” and thus less important.

Question: Mr. President... What do you think tribal sovereignty means in the twenty-first century and how do we resolve conflicts between tribes and the federal and state governments?—Mark Trahant, editorial page editor of The Seattle Post Intelligencer and former president of the Native American Journalists Association.

Answer: Tribal sovereignty means that; it’s sovereign. I mean, you’re a—you’ve been given sovereignty, and you’re viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities.—President Bush, Washington, DC, August 6, 2004.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhofer, Robert. The White Man’s Indian: Images of the American Indian from Columbus to the Present. New York: Knopf, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, Philip. Playing Indian. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, George. The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit From Identity Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • News from Native California 19:4 (Summer 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Melvin, and Thomas Shapiro. Black Wealth, White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Roy Harvey. Savagism and Civilization: A Study of the Indian and American Mind. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Renato. Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Catherine. “Business Profs Rethinking Ethics Classes.” Boston Globe. June 16, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, James. “The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom.” Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Ed. Duncan Ivison, Paul Patton, and Will Sanders. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, Bob. “‘Educate to Liberate!’: Multiculturalism and the Struggle for Ethnic Studies.” Colorlines 2:2 (Summer 1999): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Lisa Guerrero

Copyright information

© 2008 Lisa Guerrero

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnd, N.B. (2008). A New Era for Teaching American Indian Studies. In: Guerrero, L. (eds) Teaching Race in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616950_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics