Skip to main content

“Don’t Dream It, Be It”

Cultural Performance and Communitas at The Rocky Horror Picture Show

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reading Rocky Horror

Abstract

Milton Singer’s phrase “cultural performance,” adopted by social scientists as a unit of analysis for circumscribing “plays, concerts, and lectures... but also prayers, ritual readings and recitations, rites and ceremonies, festivals, and all those things we usually classify under religion and ritual rather than with the cultural and artistic” (71), can be productively applied to many of the quasi-cultic creations and recreations enjoyed by many young Americans in the early years of the twenty-first century. Singer’s search for a unit of analysis ended when his Indian friends suggested that if he wanted to understand “who we are,” he should attend local performance events in which what was on display for all to see was “who we are not.” In the same spirit—from skate boarding to eroticons, from goth costuming to online gaming, and from fan fiction to poetry slams—the current generation of adolescents and postadolescents have devised/discovered myriad forms of performative self-expression and group identification that allow for the instantiation of “who we are” via the always temporary category “who we are not.”

Liminality, marginality, and structural inferiority are conditions in which are generated myths, symbols, rituals, philosophical systems, and works of art. These cultural forms provide men with a set of templates or models which are, at one level, periodical reclassifications of reality and man’s relationship to society, nature, and culture. But they are more than classifications, since they incite men to action as well as to thought.

—Victor Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti- Structure

As a popular form of religious life, movies do what we have always asked of popular religion, namely, that they provide us with archetypal forms of humanity—heroic figures—and instruct us in the basic values and myths of our society. As we watch the characters and follow the drama on the screen, we are instructed in the values and myths of our culture and given models on which to pattern our lives.

—M. Darrol Bryant, “Cinema, Religion and Popular Culture”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Bauman, Richard. Verbal Art as Performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, M. Darrol. “Cinema, Religion and Popular Culture.” Religion and Film. Ed. John R. May and Michael Bird. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1982. 101–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chute, David. “Outlaw Cinema: Its Rise and Fall.” Film Comment 19 (1983): 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, Richard. “Across the Land: The Voice of Rocky Horror.” Time Magazine 126 (Dec. 9, 1985): 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmo’s Factory. 29 Sep. 2004. http://www.cosmosfactory.org/.

  • Day, Richard R. “Rocky Horror Picture Show: A Speech Event in Three Acts.” Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Ed. Nessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, 1983. 214–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, Alan. “Metafolklore and Oral Literary Criticism.” The Monist 50 (1966): 505–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, Alessandro. “The audience as co-author.” Text 6.3 (1986): 239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto. “Casablanca: Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage.” [1984]. Travels in Hyperreality: Essays. Trans. William Weaver. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986. 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, Rolf. “In the Romantic Tradition: Frankenstein and The Rocky Horror Picture Show.” Beyond the Suburbs of the Mind: Exploring English Romanticism. Ed. Michael Gassenmeir and Norbert Platz. Essen: Verlag Die Blaue Eule, 1987. 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Rochelle O’Gorman. “Video News.” Tower Video Collector (Dec. 1990). Tower Records: Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennep, Arnoldvan. The Rites of Passage. Trans. Gabrielle L. Caftee. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haring, Lee. “Interperformance.” Fabula: Journal of Folktale Studies 29 (1988): 365–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, Bill. The Rocky Horror Picture Show Book. New York: Plume/Penguin Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberman, J., and Jonathan Rosenbaum. “Curse of the Cult People.” Film Comment27.1 (1991): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, Dell. “Folklore’s Nature and the Sun’s Myth.” Journal of American Folklore 88 (1975): 345–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Interview with Richard O’Brien?” The Rocky Horror Picture Show: 15th Anniversary Edition. [VHS]. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Naseem. “Rocky On.” New Statesman 110 (Dec. 20–27, 1985): 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore, John. “Sexuality and Identity in The Rocky Horror Picture ShowEros in the Mind’s Eye: Sexuality and the Fantastic in Art and Film. Ed. Donald Palumbo. New York: Greenwood, 1983. 151–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, Irene. “Rocky Redux.” The Threepenny Review 44 (1991): 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piro, Sal. Creatures of the Night: The Rocky Horror Picture Show Experience. Redford, MI: Stabur, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • —“Introduction:” The Rocky Horror Picture Show Movie Novel. Ed. and adapted by Richard J. Anobile. New York: A&W Visual Library, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piro, Sal, and Michael Hess. Official Rocky Horror Show Audience Par-Tic-I-Pation Guide. Livonia, MI: Stabur, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, Ron. “Gooseflesh.” Harper’s Magazine v. 259 (Sept. 1979): 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, Raymond. “Dr. Freud Meets Dr. Frank N. Furter.” Eros in the Mind’s Eye. Ed. Donald Palumbo. New York: Greenwood, 1986. 163–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, Richard. “Collective Reflexivity: Restoration of Behavior.” A Crack in the Mirror: Reflexive Perspectives in Anthropology. Ed. Jay Ruby. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1982. 36–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Mark. “The Rocky Horror Picture Show: More Than a Lip Service.” Science Fiction Studies 7 (1980): 305–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Milton. When a Great Tradition Modernizes. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, Jim, and Richard O’Brien. The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Video [ 1975]. Dir. Jim Sharman. New York: CBS/Fox Video, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Susan. Nonsense: Aspects of Intertextuality in Folklore and Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, Gaylyn. “Midnight S/excess: Cult Configurations of ‘Femininity’ and the Perverse.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 1.2 (1989): 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti- Structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock

Copyright information

© 2008 Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Locke, L. (2008). “Don’t Dream It, Be It”. In: Weinstock, J.A. (eds) Reading Rocky Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616820_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics