Abstract
Milton Singer’s phrase “cultural performance,” adopted by social scientists as a unit of analysis for circumscribing “plays, concerts, and lectures... but also prayers, ritual readings and recitations, rites and ceremonies, festivals, and all those things we usually classify under religion and ritual rather than with the cultural and artistic” (71), can be productively applied to many of the quasi-cultic creations and recreations enjoyed by many young Americans in the early years of the twenty-first century. Singer’s search for a unit of analysis ended when his Indian friends suggested that if he wanted to understand “who we are,” he should attend local performance events in which what was on display for all to see was “who we are not.” In the same spirit—from skate boarding to eroticons, from goth costuming to online gaming, and from fan fiction to poetry slams—the current generation of adolescents and postadolescents have devised/discovered myriad forms of performative self-expression and group identification that allow for the instantiation of “who we are” via the always temporary category “who we are not.”
Liminality, marginality, and structural inferiority are conditions in which are generated myths, symbols, rituals, philosophical systems, and works of art. These cultural forms provide men with a set of templates or models which are, at one level, periodical reclassifications of reality and man’s relationship to society, nature, and culture. But they are more than classifications, since they incite men to action as well as to thought.
—Victor Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti- Structure
As a popular form of religious life, movies do what we have always asked of popular religion, namely, that they provide us with archetypal forms of humanity—heroic figures—and instruct us in the basic values and myths of our society. As we watch the characters and follow the drama on the screen, we are instructed in the values and myths of our culture and given models on which to pattern our lives.
—M. Darrol Bryant, “Cinema, Religion and Popular Culture”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Bauman, Richard. Verbal Art as Performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, 1977.
Bryant, M. Darrol. “Cinema, Religion and Popular Culture.” Religion and Film. Ed. John R. May and Michael Bird. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1982. 101–14.
Chute, David. “Outlaw Cinema: Its Rise and Fall.” Film Comment 19 (1983): 9–14.
Corliss, Richard. “Across the Land: The Voice of Rocky Horror.” Time Magazine 126 (Dec. 9, 1985): 22–23.
Cosmo’s Factory. 29 Sep. 2004. http://www.cosmosfactory.org/.
Day, Richard R. “Rocky Horror Picture Show: A Speech Event in Three Acts.” Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Ed. Nessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, 1983. 214–21.
Dundes, Alan. “Metafolklore and Oral Literary Criticism.” The Monist 50 (1966): 505–16.
Duranti, Alessandro. “The audience as co-author.” Text 6.3 (1986): 239–47.
Eco, Umberto. “Casablanca: Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage.” [1984]. Travels in Hyperreality: Essays. Trans. William Weaver. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986. 197–211.
Eichler, Rolf. “In the Romantic Tradition: Frankenstein and The Rocky Horror Picture Show.” Beyond the Suburbs of the Mind: Exploring English Romanticism. Ed. Michael Gassenmeir and Norbert Platz. Essen: Verlag Die Blaue Eule, 1987. 95–114.
Flynn, Rochelle O’Gorman. “Video News.” Tower Video Collector (Dec. 1990). Tower Records: Sacramento, CA.
Gennep, Arnoldvan. The Rites of Passage. Trans. Gabrielle L. Caftee. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1960.
Haring, Lee. “Interperformance.” Fabula: Journal of Folktale Studies 29 (1988): 365–72.
Henkin, Bill. The Rocky Horror Picture Show Book. New York: Plume/Penguin Books, 1979.
Hoberman, J., and Jonathan Rosenbaum. “Curse of the Cult People.” Film Comment27.1 (1991): 18–22.
Hymes, Dell. “Folklore’s Nature and the Sun’s Myth.” Journal of American Folklore 88 (1975): 345–69.
“Interview with Richard O’Brien?” The Rocky Horror Picture Show: 15th Anniversary Edition. [VHS]. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, 1992.
Khan, Naseem. “Rocky On.” New Statesman 110 (Dec. 20–27, 1985): 77.
Kilgore, John. “Sexuality and Identity in The Rocky Horror Picture Show” Eros in the Mind’s Eye: Sexuality and the Fantastic in Art and Film. Ed. Donald Palumbo. New York: Greenwood, 1983. 151–59.
Oppenheim, Irene. “Rocky Redux.” The Threepenny Review 44 (1991): 27–29.
Piro, Sal. Creatures of the Night: The Rocky Horror Picture Show Experience. Redford, MI: Stabur, 1990.
—“Introduction:” The Rocky Horror Picture Show Movie Novel. Ed. and adapted by Richard J. Anobile. New York: A&W Visual Library, 1980.
Piro, Sal, and Michael Hess. Official Rocky Horror Show Audience Par-Tic-I-Pation Guide. Livonia, MI: Stabur, 1991.
Rosenbaum, Ron. “Gooseflesh.” Harper’s Magazine v. 259 (Sept. 1979): 87.
Ruble, Raymond. “Dr. Freud Meets Dr. Frank N. Furter.” Eros in the Mind’s Eye. Ed. Donald Palumbo. New York: Greenwood, 1986. 163–68.
Schechner, Richard. “Collective Reflexivity: Restoration of Behavior.” A Crack in the Mirror: Reflexive Perspectives in Anthropology. Ed. Jay Ruby. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1982. 36–81.
Siegel, Mark. “The Rocky Horror Picture Show: More Than a Lip Service.” Science Fiction Studies 7 (1980): 305–12.
Singer, Milton. When a Great Tradition Modernizes. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1972.
Sharman, Jim, and Richard O’Brien. The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Video [ 1975]. Dir. Jim Sharman. New York: CBS/Fox Video, 1990.
Stewart, Susan. Nonsense: Aspects of Intertextuality in Folklore and Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.
Studlar, Gaylyn. “Midnight S/excess: Cult Configurations of ‘Femininity’ and the Perverse.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 1.2 (1989): 2–14.
Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti- Structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1969.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Locke, L. (2008). “Don’t Dream It, Be It”. In: Weinstock, J.A. (eds) Reading Rocky Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616820_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616820_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37713-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61682-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)