Skip to main content

Mocking the Mirror

Film Spectatorship as Hypperreal Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reading Rocky Horror
  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

Movie houses blacken out the light and quiet audiences to direct and intensify the individual’s experience of the film. Psychoanalytic approaches to film theory tend to reinforce this taming of the audience by describing the audience primarily as individual spectators and ignoring their social performance—performance that is more blatant at cult films but is also important in traditional film venues. The spectators at The Rocky Horror Picture Show challenge the norm by misbehaving: They actively participate with the film in a physical way, transforming the show by adding elements of improvisatory live theater. Incorporating their bodies and voices into the viewing experience, the spectators defy the boundaries and limitations placed on them by a darkened theater designed for viewing pleasure only.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Banash, David. “Reading Baudrillard.” 89.1 (2003): 123–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simulations. Trans. Paul Foss, et al. New York: Semiotext(e), 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. “The Work ot Art in the Age ot Mechanical Reproduction.” 15 Feb 2004. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/phi1osophy/works/ge/benjarnin.htrn (accessed March 8, 2005).

  • Berger, John, et al. Ways or Seeing. London: BBC and Penguin-Allen Lane, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgyan, George. “The Rocky Horror Picture Show Movie Script.” 3 May 1993. http://www.alwaysontherun.net/rhps.txt (accessed March 17, 2005).

  • Faigley, Lester. Fragments of Rationality: Postmodernity and the Subject of Composition. London: U of Pittsburgh P, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, Anne. Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley: U of California P, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, Bill. The Rocky Horror Picture Show Book. New York: Penguin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katovich, Michael A., and Patrick T. Kinkade. “Reading Rocky Horror.” The Sociological Quarterly 33.2 (1992): 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas. “Boundaries and Borderlines: Reflections on Jean Baudrillard and Critical Theory.” Illuminations: The Critical Theory Project. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/Illumina%20Folder/ke112.htm (accessed March 17, 2005.

  • Kokonis, Michael. “Postmodernism, Hyperreality and the Hegemony of the Spectacle in New Hollywood: The Case of the Truman Show.http://genesis.ee.auth.gr/dimakis/Gramma/7/02-kokonis.htm (accessed March 17, 2005).

  • Lapsley, Robert, and Michael Westlake. Film Theory: An Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, Todd. “Looking for the Gaze: Lacanian Film Theory and Its Vicissitudes.” Cinema Journal 42.3 (2003): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Christian. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. New York: Oxford UP, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema?” Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1989. 14–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, Richard P. “Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. May 5, 2004. http://webpages.ursinus.edu/rrichter/baudrillardone.html (accessed March 8, 2005).

  • Ruble, Raymond. “Dr. Freud Meets Dr. Frank N. Furter.” Eros in the Mind’s Eye: Sexuality and the Fantastic in Art and Film. Ed. Donald Palumbo. New York: Greenwood, 1986. 161–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skal, David J. The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror. New York: Faber and Faber, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell, James. B. “Frankenstein and the Anatomy of Horror.” Georgia Review 37 (1983): 41–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, Jim. Cosmic Light: The Birth of a Cult Classic. Altoona, PA: Acme Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemen, Paul. “Voyeurism, The Look, and Dwoskin.” Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. Ed. Phillip Rosen. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 210–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Robert E. “Don’t Dream It: Performance and The Rocky Horror Picture Show.” The Cult Film Experience: Beyond All Reason. Ed. J. P. Telotte. Austin: U of Austin P, 1991. 156–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. Enjoy Your Symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. New York: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock

Copyright information

© 2008 Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, H.C., Levy, M.A. (2008). Mocking the Mirror. In: Weinstock, J.A. (eds) Reading Rocky Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616820_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics