Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Political Participation of Berlin’s Turkish Migrants in the Dual Citizenship and Headscarf Debates: A Multilevel Comparison

  • Chapter
Migration and Activism in Europe Since 1945

Abstract

When Turkish migrants came to Germany in the early 1960s as guest workers, it was not expected that they would stay. The notion of “return” was intrinsic to the guest worker system, premised as it was on the importation of cheap labor without social or political costs.1 Workers would assist in the rebuilding of postwar Germany and then return to Turkey when the job was done. Yet even after the first oil crisis, a rise in unemployment and the official end to the guest worker program in 1973, most Turkish guest workers did not leave but rather made Germany their home. They became permanent residents. Five decades on, there are almost two million Turkish migrants without German citizenship in Germany. 2 They comprise Germany’s biggest migrant group and a significant proportion of Germany’s three million Muslims. 3 Further, unlike many other migrants in Germany, Turkish migrants do not hold European Union citizenship and therefore cannot benefit from the advantages this brings. The original Turkish guest workers, their children, and their children’s children have largely remained foreigners. They are denied formal political rights such as the right to vote, 4 the right to stand for office, 5 and the constitutionally protected rights to assemble and associate, although the latter are provided through statute. 6

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Christian Joppke, Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany and Great Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marieluise Beck, Bericht der Beauftragten der Bundesregierung für Ausländerfragen über die Lage der Ausländer in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Bonn: Bonner Universitäts-Buchdruckerei, 2002), 391.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mehmet Kilicgedik, “Bielefeld: Politische Partizipation fängt auf der kommunalen Ebene an,” in Integration durch Partizipation: Ausländische Mitbürger in demokratischen Gesellschaften, eds. Christian Büttner and Berthold Meyer (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2001), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanspeter Kriesi, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Macro G. Giugni, New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995), xv.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simon Green, The Politics of Exclusion: Institutions and Immigration Policy in Contemporary Germany (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl-Heinz Meier Braun, “ 40 Jahre Gastarbeiter und Ausländerpolitik in Deutschland,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B35 (1995): 14–22, 16, cited in Green, Politics of Exclusion, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ertekin Özcan, Türkische Immigrantenorganisationen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine Entwicklung politischer Organisationen und politischer Orientierung unter türkischen Arbeitsimmigranten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Berlin West (Berlin: Hitit Verlag, 1989), 337; and Irfan Ergi, Lebenssituation und politische Beteiligung von ArbeitsimmigrantInnen in der Bundesrepublik: Möglichkeiten, Probleme und Formen, dargestellt am Beispiel von TürkInnen (Tectum Verlag, Marburg, 2000), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The seminal comparative work on guest worker systems by Miller for instance, devotes only one page to a discussion of federal German treatment of guest workers, and spends the remainder of his discussion of Germany to the Land-level, without explicitly differentiating between these levels: Mark J. Miller, Foreign Workers in Western Europe: An Emerging Political Force (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1981), 136.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for instance, Walter Dean Burnham, “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe,” American Political Science Review 61 (1965): 7–28; Paul Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet, Erie County Study: The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968); Martin Needler, “Political Development and Socioeconomic Development: The Case of Latin America,” American Political Science Review 62 (1968): 889–97 and Hans-Martin Uehlinger, Politische Partizipation in der Bundesrepublik: Strukturen und Erklärungsmodelle (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ronald Inglehart, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1977), 296–7; G. Bingham Powell, “ American turnout in comparative perspective,” American Political Science Review 80 (1986): 17–42, 40 and Sidney Verba and Norman Nie, Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality (New York: Harper and Row, 1978), 1. All of these definitions of “political participation” draw an explicit link with citizenship.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi, “Mapping the Terrain,” in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, eds. David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi (Carlton, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, 2004), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bo Rothstein, “Political Institutions: An Overview,” in A New Handbook of Political Science, eds. Robert Goodin and Hans-Dieter. Klingemann (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 139–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. But see the important contribution of sociological neo-institutionalism: Peter A. Hall and Rosemary C. Taylor, Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms (Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Cologne, Germany, 1996), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruud Koopmans and Paul Statham, “Migration and Ethnic Relations as a Field of Political Contention: An Opportunity Structure Approach,” in Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives, eds. Ruud Koopmans and Paul Statham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peter K. Eisinger, “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities,” American Political Science Review 76 (1973): 11–28, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sidney Tarrow, Power in Movement. Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kriesi et al., New Social Movements in Western Europe, xiii–xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a general political science approach: Kurt Sontheimer, K and Wilhelm Bleek, Grundzüge des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Munich: Piper Verlag, 2003), 353. For migrant-specific analysis: Romain Garbaye, “Ethnic Minorities, Cities and Institutions: A Comparison of the Modes of Management of Ethnic Diversity of a French and a British City,” in Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives, note 13, 300.

    Google Scholar 

  19. David A. Snow and Robert D. Benford, “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization,” in From Structure to Action: Social Movement Participation Across Cultures, eds. Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988) 210; and Koopmans and Statham, in Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charles Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution (Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1978), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jürgen Filjalkowski and Helmut Gillmeister, Ausländervereine—ein Forschungsbericht: über die Funktion von Eigenorganisation für die Integration heterogener Zuwanderer in einer Aufnahmegesellschaft—am Beispiel Berlin (Berlin: Hitit Verlag, 1997), 274–75; Peter J. Katzenstein, Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semisovereign State (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987), 220–21; and Jürgen Puskeppeleit and Dietrich Thränhardt, Vom betreuten Ausländer zum gleichberechtigten Bürger (Solingen: Lambertus, 1990), 143–44.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruud Koopmans and Paul Statham, “Migration and Ethnic Relations as a Field of Political Contention: An Opportunity Structure Approach,” in Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives, eds. Ruud. Koopmans and Paul Statham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Filjalkowski and Gillmeister, Ausländervereine, 274–75; and Puskeppeleit and Thränhardt, Vom betreuten Ausländer, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ruud Koopmans, Paul Statham, Marco Giugni and Florence Passy, Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garbaye, “Ethnic Minorities, Cities and Institutions,” in Koopmans and Statham; Patrick Ireland, The Policy Challenge of Ethnic Diversity: Immigrant Politics in France and Switzerland (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994) and Ruud Koopmans and Paul Statham, “Migrant Mobilisation and Political Opportunities: An Empirical Assessment of Local and National Variation,” paper at Explaining Changes in Migration Policy : Debates from Different Perspectives, October 27–28, 2000, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ruud Koopmans, “Migrant Mobilisation and Political Opportunities: Variation Among German Cities and a Comparison with the United Kingdom and the Netherlands,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30, no. 3 (2004): 449–70, 464.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruud Koopmans, Codebook for the Analy sis of Political Mobilisation and Communication in European Public Spheres, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Germany, 2, http://europub.wz-berlin.de/Data/Codebooks%20questionnaires/ D2–1-claims-codebook.pdf.

  28. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Weitere Informationen zu den Projekten 2007, http://www.wz-berlin.de/zkd/zcm/projekte/details.de.htm#merci.

  29. Given the low levels of naturalization among migrants in Germany, the coding assumed that migrants did not hold German citizenship—that is, were noncitizen, non-state actors.

    Google Scholar 

  30. SPD-Greens, Koalitionsvereinbarung zwischen der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschland und Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, IX(7) Integration (Bonn, Germany, 1998), http://www.datenschutz-berlin.de/doc/de/koalo/09.htm#ix7.

  31. Celalettin Kartal, “Die ‘doppelte Staatsbürgerschaft’ als Integrationsfaktor in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland,” Zeitschrift für türkische Studien 42 (2002): 226.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sigrid Averesch, “ Nach 95 Jahren ist das deutsche Blutsrecht passé,” Berliner Zeitung, October 16, 1998, 4 and Sigrid Averesch, “Staatsbürger: Riskanter Gang nach Karlsruhe: Klage Erfolg ist umstritten,” Berliner Zeitung, January 8, 1999, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heike Hagedorn, Wer darf Mitglieder werden? Einbürgerung in Deutschland und Frankreich im Vergleich (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2001), 188.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Arthur B. Gunlicks, The Länder and German Federalism (New York: Manchester University Press, 2003), 295; Christian Joppke, “Mobilisation of Culture and the Reform of Citizenship Law: Germany and the United States,” in Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives, note 13, 155; and Graham Thom, Immigration and Modern Western Citizenship, PhD dissertation. Discipline of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney (2000), 393.

    Google Scholar 

  35. There are certain very limited exceptions allowing for dual citizenship in Germany: Foreigner Act (1990), Article 2, §87 as amended by the Nationality Act. Since January 1, 2005, these changes are incorporated into the Nationality Act (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kenan Kolat, Interview with author, Offices of the Türkischer Bund in Berlin Brandenburg. I interviewed him in German and transcribed the interview in full. Translation into English is my own. Berlin, December 8, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Innenausschuß des Deutschen Bundestages, “Reform des Staatsangehörigkeitsrechts: Die parlamentarische Beratung,” Dienstag, dem April 13, 1999, in Protokoll über die 12. Sitzung des Innenausschusses (Bonn: Bonner Universitäts-Buchdruckerei, 1999), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stephen J. Silvia, “The Bundesrat, Interest Groups, and Gridlock: German Nationalism at the End of the Twentieth Century,” in Breakdown, Breakup, Breakthrough: Germany ’s Difficult Passage to Modernity , ed. Carl Lankowski (New York: Berghahn Books, 1999), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gunlicks, Länder and German federalism, 348–49 and Sontheimer and Bleek, Gründzüge des politischen Systems, 364–65.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rogers Brubaker, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992), 114–37.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bernhard Santel, “Außen vor?—Zur politischen Partizipation von Zuwanderern in Deutschland,” in Integration und Partizipation in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft, eds. Marianne Krüger-Potratz, Hans H. Reich and Bernhard Santel (Osnabrück: Universitätsverlag Rasch, 2002), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Claudia Diehl and Michael Blohm, “Apathy, adaptation or ethnic mobilisation? On the attitudes of a politically excluded group,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27, no. 3 (2001): 412. The “ Left” here is defined as the SPD, PDS, and Greens combined.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Randell Hansen, “Citizenship and Integration in Europe,” in Towards Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States, eds. Christian Joppke and Ewa Morawska (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 94.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ulrich Zawatka-Gerlach, “Eine Steilvorlage für die CDU – Warnschub für SPD und Grüne,” der Tagesspiegel, February 9, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Since 2002, the Commissioner’s official title is “Commissioner of the National Government for Migration, Refugees and Integration.”

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bernd Geiß, “Die Ausländerbeauftragten der Bundesregierung in der ausländerpolitischen Diskussion,” in Deutschland – ein Einwanderungsland? Rückblick, Bilanz und neue Fragen, Festschrift des europäischen Forums für Migrationsstudien, eds. Edda Currie and Tanya Wunderlich (Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Federal Commissioner for Foreigners, “Beck: Union soll Farbe bekennen,” Press Statement, 9 February 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Federal Commissioner for Foreigners, “Überfälliger Schritt zu einem modernen Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht,” Press Statement, March 12. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Manfred Hirner, “Das Parlament im Netzwerk gesellschaftlicher Interessen,” in Parlament und Gesellschaft: Eine Funktionsanalyse der repräsentativen Demokratie, eds. Dietrich Herzog, Hilke Rebensdorf, and Bernhard Weßels (Berlin: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1993), 154.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Innenausschuß des Deutschen Bundestages. Reform des Staatsangehörigkeitsrechts, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jan Thomsen, “Die PDS will noch kein Kopftuch-Verbot,” Berliner Zeitung, September 27, 2003, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  52. “Körting will Kopftuch im öffentlichen Dienst verbieten,” der Tagesspiegel, September 26, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Susanne Vieth-Entus, “Kopftuch-Verbot: Eltern und DGH unterstützen Körting. Lehrergewerkschaft will Debatte über Trennung von Staat und Kirche,” der Tagesspiegel, September 27, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sabine Beikler, “Nach Karlsruher Urteil: Böger plant Gesetz gegen Kopftücher,” der Tagesspiegel, September 25, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  55. “100 Prozent Baumwolle, 0 Prozent Terror,” der Taggespiegel, January 19, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  56. See for instance the following forums: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, “The Headscarf in Berlin,” Public forum, Berlin, February 11, 2004, 7:00pm–9:30pm. Brandenburg, House of Cultures, “Al global forum,” Berlin, March 9, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Correspondence by email with Marion Seelig, PDS Member of Parliament, Berlin, over the headscarf ban, Berlin–Sydney, August 31, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  58. PDS, “Gesetz zur weltanschaulich-religiösen Neutralität des Staates: SPD and PDS vereinbaren Maßnahmenpaket,” PDS Newsletter, April 2, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Barbara John, Repräsentativumfrage zur Lebenssituation türkischer Berlinerinnen und Berliner (Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Arbeit, Soziales und Frauen, 2002), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Berrin Alpbek, interview with author at the offices of Turkish Union of Berlin Brandenburg. Interview was in German. Translation into English is my own, January 21, 2004; Bilkay Öney, interview with author at the offices of Berlin Greens about her role within Immigrün. Interview was in German and English. Translation into English was my own, February 13, 2004; and Saadet Özulusal, interview with author, Offices of Treff- und Informationsort für Frauen aus der Türkei, Kreuzberg, Berlin. Interview in German. Translation into English was my own, January 9, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ozcan Mutlu, interview with author as representative of Immigrün, Greens Office, Berlin. I interviewed him in German and English. All translations into English are my own, January 22, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Burhan Kesice, interview with author, Offices of the Islamische Föderation Berlin. I interviewed him in German. All translations into English are my own, February 13, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Roland Roth, “Lokale Demokratie ‘von unten’: Bürgerinitiativen, städtischer Protest, Bürgerbewegung und neue soziale Bewegungen in der Kommunalpolitik,” in Kommunalpolitik: Politisches Handeln in den Gemeinden, eds. Helmut Wollmann and Roland Roth (Bonn, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 1998), 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Thomas Scheffer, “Ausländerpolitik in der Kommune,” in Kommunalpolitik: Politisches Handeln in den Gemeinden, 776–78.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Thomas Schwarz, Zuwanderer im Netz des Wohlfahrtsstaats—Türkische Jugendliche und die Berliner Kommunalpolitik (Berlin: Edition Parabolis, 1992), 133.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Winfried Steffani, “Länderparlamentismus im parlamentarischen Bundesstaat,” in Liberale Demokratie in Europa and den USA, Festschrift für Kurt L. Shell, eds. Franz Greß and Hans Vorländer (Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, 1990) cited in Gunlicks., Länder and German federalism, 217.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Thomas Schwarz, “Integrationspolitik als Beauftragtenpolitik: Die Ausländerbeautragte des Berliner Senats,” in Migration und Integration in Berlin: Wissenschaftliche Analysen und politische Perspektiven, ed. Frank Gesemann (Berlin: Leske + Budrich, Opladen, 2001), 134.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Maria Berger and Christian Galonska, “Political Integration by a Detour? Ethnic Communities and Social Capital of Migrants in Berlin,” paper presented at Demokratie und Sozialkapital—die Rolle zivilgesellschaftlicher Akteure, June 2002, Berlin, 14. The “Left” here is defined as the SPD, PDS, and Greens combined.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Schwarz, Zuwanderer im Netz des Wohlfahrtsstaats, 132–33.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Günter Piening, “ Muslimische Frauen integrieren—nicht ausgrenzen: Ein Kopftuchverbot löst keine Probleme!,” Press Statement, Integrationsbeauftragter des Berliner Senats, Berlin, February 17, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Günter Piening, “Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz (AGG) tritt in Kraft,” Press Statement, Integrationsbeauftragter des Berliner Senats, Berlin, August 17, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  72. K. Rüdiger Durth, “Keine religiösen Symbole im Öffentlichen Dienst: Berlin und das Kopftuchverbot,” Das Parlament (05–06).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Scheffer, Ausländerpolitik in der Kommune; and Gunlicks, Länder and German federalism, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Sigrid Baringhorst, “Symbolic Politics of Multiculturalism: How German Cities Campaign against Racism,” in Minorities in European Cities: The Dy namics of Social Inclusion and Social Exclusion at the Neighbourhood Level, eds. Sophie Body-Gendrot and Marco Martiniello (London: Macmillan, 2000), 162–75; and Scheffer, Ausländerpolitik in der Kommune.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Patrick Ireland, Becoming Europe: Immigration, Integration, and the Welfare State (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Anna Boucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Wendy Pojmann

Copyright information

© 2008 Wendy Pojmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boucher, A. (2008). The Political Participation of Berlin’s Turkish Migrants in the Dual Citizenship and Headscarf Debates: A Multilevel Comparison. In: Pojmann, W. (eds) Migration and Activism in Europe Since 1945. Europe in Transition: The NYU European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230615540_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation