Skip to main content

Good Governance and Sustainable Development: The New Partnership for Africa’s Development and the African Peer Review Mechanism

  • Chapter
Poverty, Livelihoods, and Governance in Africa
  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

During the past two decades and beyond, Africa was described by various commentators as a continent betrayed, deprived, in chaos, in plight, in self-destruction, in crisis, shackled, existing in name only, being predatory or kleptocratic, collapsed into anarchy or viciousness, and being plundered (Ayittey, 1993, 1998; Hope, 2002a; Hope and Chikulo, 2000; Houngnikpo, 2006; Mbaku, 2007; Schwab, 2001; Guest, 2004). These are but a few of the colorful negative images painted about a continent that lacked the capacity and willingness to implement a sustained policy environment conducive to, among other things, good governance, entrenchment of democracy, peace and security, growth and development, and poverty reduction. However, a new generation of enlightened African leaders decided in the new millennium to stake Africa’s claim to the twenty-first century and help facilitate the continent’s quest to fulfill its promise of better development performance. In that regard, they produced a framework plan entitled the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abed, G. T. (2001). “The Changing Role of the State, Governance and New Capacity Requirements.” In M. A. Dessart and R. E. Ubogu (eds.), Capacity Building, Governance, and Economic Reform in Africa. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alence, R. (2004). “Political Institutions and Developmental Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Journal of Modern African Studies 42(2): 163–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluko-Olokun, I. (2001). “The New Partnership for African Development,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoako, K. Y. (2000). Perspectives on Africa’s Development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayittey, G. B. N. (1993). Africa Betrayed. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1998). Africa in Chaos. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, S. S. (2002). Imagine There’s No Country: Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in the Era of Globalization. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga de Macedo, J., Foy, C., and Oman, C. P. (2002). “The Development Challenge.” In J. Braga de Macedo, C. Foy, and C. P. Oman (eds.), Development is Back. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M., and van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W., and Crosby, B. L. (2002). Managing Policy Reform: Concepts and Tools for Decision-Makers in Developing and Transitioning Countries. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Partnership for International Development: Rhetoric or Results? Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghy, T. M. (1986). “Politics and Vision in Africa: The Interplay of Domination, Equality and Liberty.” In P. Chabal (ed.), Political Domination in Africa: Reflections on the Limits of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCFA (Commission on Capital Flows to Africa) (2003). A Ten-Year Strategy for Increasing Capital Flows to Africa. Washington, DC: CCFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CFA (Commission for Africa) (nd) Objectives of the Commission. London: CFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005). Our Common Interest: Report of the Commission for Africa. London: CFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D., and Smyth, F. (1998). “Africa’s New Bloc,” Foreign Affairs 77(2): 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2003). Report on the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). Luxembourg: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y. (2003). Democracy, Governance, and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • G8 Summit (2002). “G8 Africa Action Plan,” http://www.g8.gc.ca/2002_summit/menu-en.asp.

  • — (2007). “Growth and Responsibility in Africa: Summit Declaration,” http://www.g<-=8.de/Webs/G8/EN/Homepage/home.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada (2003a). “Statement of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors,” Paris, February, http://www.g8.gc.ca/menu-en.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003b). “G-7 Finance Working Paper: Aid Effectiveness,” http://www.g8.gc.ca/working_paper_aid_effectiveness-en.asp.

  • Grindle, M. S., and Thomas, J. W. (1991). Public Choices and Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, R. (2004). The Shackled Continent: Power, Corruption, and African Lives. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, C. R. (2003). “Peer Review.” Paper Prepared for the Meeting of the Commission on Capital Flows to Africa, Washington, DC, February 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R. (2002a). From Crisis to Renewal: Development Policy and Management in Africa. Leiden: Brill Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2002c). “Shaping the Enabling Environment for Private Capital Flows in Africa: A Governance Perspective.” In OECD (ed.), Official Development Assistance and Private Finance: Attracting Finance and Investment to Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2006). “Capacity Development and Good Governance.” In A.S. Huque and H. Zafarullah (eds.), International Development Governance. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R., and Chikulo, B. C. (eds.) (2000). Corruption and Development in Africa: Lessons from Country Case Studies. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R., and Hamdok, A. (2002). Guidelines for Enhancing Good Economic and Corporate Governance in Africa. Addis Ababa: UNECA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houngnikpo, M. C. (2006). Africa’s Elusive Quest for Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, O. E. (1994). Public Management and Administration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (1998). “Sovereignty, Responsibility, and Accountability: Challenges at the National Level in Africa.” In F. M. Deng and T. Lyons (eds.), African Reckoning: A Quest for Good Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union) (1997). Universal Declaration on Democracy. Geneva: IPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, R. (2003). “Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better?” Policy Research Working Paper 3077, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. (2002). Regional Surveillance Mechanisms in East Asia. Tokyo: Kobe Research Project, Institute for International Monetary Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. (2002). Smart Partnerships for African Development: A New Strategic Framework. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabbaj, O. (2003). The Challenge of African Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R. (2004). “The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM): An Assessment of Concept and Design,” http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/sk145.

  • Kaufmann, D., and. Kraay, A. (2002). “Growth Without Governance,” Economia 3(1): 169–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, S. (2002). “Fostering Dialogue to Strengthen Good Governance.” In OECD (ed.), Public Sector Transparency and Accountability: Making it Happen. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopits, G., and Craig, J. (1998). Transparency in Government Operations. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Claros, A. (2004). “What Does the Growth Competitiveness Index Say About Development in Africa?” In E. Hernández-Catá (ed.), The Africa Competitiveness Report 2004. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbaku, J. M. (2007). Corruption in Africa: Causes, Consequences, and Cleanups. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbeki, T. (2001). “New Partnership for Africa’s Development and African Union.” Address to the Joint Sitting of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces, Pretoria, South Africa, October 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2002). Letter to the Right Honourable Jean Chretien, Prime Minister of Canada, November 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, G., and Mepham, D. (2004). “Promoting Effective States: A Progressive Policy Response to Failed and Failing States,” http://www.ippr.org.uk.

  • MCC (Millennium Challenge Corporation) (2007). “Countries,” http://www.nepad.org.

  • NEPAD Secretariat (2001). The New Partnership for Africa’s Development. Midrand, South Africa: NEPAD Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEPAD Secretariat (2002a). Declaration on Democracy, Political, Economic and Corporate Governance. Midrand, South Africa: NEPAD Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002b). “Communiqué Issued at the End of the Fifth Summit of the Heads of State and Government Implementation Committee of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development,” Abuja, Sunday, 3 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003a). Objectives, Standards, Criteria and Indicators for the African Peer Mechanism (The APRM). Midrand, South Africa: NEPAD Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003b). African Peer Review Mechanism: Organization and Processes. Midrand, South Africa: NEPAD Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003c). “Communiqué Issued at the End of the Sixth Summit of the Heads of State and Government Implementation Committee of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development,” Abuja, Sunday, 9 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003d). “Communiqué Issued at the End of the Seventh Summit of the Heads of State and Government Implementation Committee of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development,” Abuja, Wednesday, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003e). “Report of the High-Level Working Session of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) Panel of Eminent Persons (APR Panel),” Cape Town, 25–27 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007a). “African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) Gathers Momentum,” Press Release, http://www.nepad.org.

  • — (2007b). “Review Exercises,” Press Release, http://www.nepad.org

  • Nowels, L. (2003). The Millennium Challenge Account: Congressional Consideration of a New Foreign Aid Initiative. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ögütçü, M. (2002). “Good Governance and Best Practices for Investment Policy and Promotion.” Paper Prepared for the UNCTAD Workshop on Efficient and Transparent Investment Promotion Practices: The Case of LDCs, Geneva, June 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2003). Peer Review: An OECD Tool for Cooperation and Change. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. I. (2004). “The Failure and Collapse of Nation States: Breakdown, Prevention, and Repair.” In R. I. Rotberg (ed.), When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2004). “Doing the Sums on Africa,” The Economist, May 22: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitoti, G. (2002). The Challenges of Economic and Institutional Reforms in Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, A. (1999). “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M. F. Plattner (eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, P. (2001). Africa: A Continent Self-Destructs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Council for Government Policy (2001). Development Policy and Good Governance. The Hague: Scientific Council for Government Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2002). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, J. T., Weinstein, M. M., and Halperin, M. H. (2004). “Why Democracies Excel,” Foreign Affairs 83(5): 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A-M. (2003). “Everyday Global Governance,” Daedalus 132(1): 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stals, C. (2004). “Address at the Occasion of the Opening Ceremony of the National Stakeholders Forum of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) in Ghana.” Accra, Ghana, International Conference Center, 27 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, J., and Wacziarg, R. (2001). “How Democracy Affects Growth,” European Economic Review 45(8): 1341–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1998). Annual Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization. Document A/53/1. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007). “Estimates of Rates of Growth of GDP,” http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm.

  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2003). World Investment Report 2003. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005). Economic Development in Africa: Rethinking the Role of Foreign Investment. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2002). Human Development Report 2002. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2006). Human Development Report 2006. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (2002). The African Peer Review Mechanism: Some Frequently Asked Questions. Addis Ababa: UNECA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (2005). African Governance Report 2005. Addis Ababa: UNECA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization) (2004). Industrial Development Report 2004: Industrialization, Environment and the Millennium Development Goals in Sub-Saharan Africa. Vienna: UNIDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (United States Agency for International Development) (2002). “The Millennium Challenge Account: Fact Sheet,” http://www.usaid.gov/mca.

  • Wang, Y., and Yoon, D. R. (2002). Mechanisms of Regional Surveillance in East Asia and its Prospects. Tokyo: Kobe Research Project, Institute for International Monetary Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000). Reforming Public Institutions and Strengthening Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007). Global Development Finance 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack-Williams, A. B. (2001). “No Democracy, No Development: Reflections on Democracy and Development in Africa,” Review of African Political Economy 28(88): 213–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Kempe Ronald Hope, Sr.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hope, K.R. (2008). Good Governance and Sustainable Development: The New Partnership for Africa’s Development and the African Peer Review Mechanism. In: Poverty, Livelihoods, and Governance in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230615526_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics