Adnan Menderes, Islam, and His Conflict with the One-Party Era Establishment

  • Mogens Pelt
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Governance, Security, and Development book series (GSD)


In May 1950, Adnan Menderes’ Democratic Party (DP) won a preponderant victory at the first free elections held in Turkey. Menderes also proved an overwhelming success at the elections in 1954 and 1957. His advent to power marked a watershed in the history of the Turkish nation-state, because it soon proved a serious challenge to the monopoly of Atatürk’s old guard on state and society. The DP prevailed by mobilizing the peasants, the bulk of the population constituting approximately 80 percent of all Turks. This means that these victories to a wide extent were secured by the votes of those who had been excluded—or suppressed—by the Kemalist reforms. As it was only twenty-five years earlier that Atatürk had launched his sweeping campaign against the Ottoman order and the institutions of Islam, this leaves the impression that a strong undercurrent of resistance or immunity to the Kemalist reforms survived almost three decades of one-party rule.


Armed Force Democratic Party Religious Instruction Political Purpose Constitutional Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abu-Rabi, Ibrahim M. (2003): A Chronology of Said Nursi’s Life, in: Ibrahim M.Abu-Rabi (ed.): Islam at the Crossroad: On the Life and Thought of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Rabi, Ibrahim M. and Graham E. Fuller (2004): The Future of Political Islam, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, Feroz (1993): The Making of Modern Turkey, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockett, Gavin D. (1998): Collective Action and the Turkish Revolution: Towards a Framework for the Social History of the Atatürk Era, 1923–38, Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 34 (4): 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geyikdagi, Mehmet Yashar (1984): Political Parties in Turkey: The Role of Islam, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Hale, William (1994): Turkish Politics and Military, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, George S. (1965): The Role of the Military in Turkish Politics, Middle East Journal, vol. 19 (1): 54–56.Google Scholar
  8. Karpat, Kemal (1970): The Military and Politics in Turkey, 1960–64: A Socio-Cultural Analysis of a Revolution, American Historical Review, vol. LXXXV (6): 1654–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tapper, Richard (1994): Introduction, in: Richard Tapper (ed.): Islam in Modern Turkey: Religion, Politics and Literature in a Secular State, London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  10. Weiker, Walter F. (1963): The Turkish Revolution1960–1961, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  11. Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky (2002): Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt, New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Yavuz, M. Hakan (1997): The Matrix of Modern Turkish Islamic Movements: The Naqshbandi Sufi Order, in: Elisabeth Ozdalga (ed): Naqshbandis in Western and Central Asia: Change and Continuity, Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.Google Scholar
  13. — (2003): Islamic Political Identity in Turkey, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Zürcher, Erik J. (1993): Turkey: A Modern History, London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dietrich Jung and Catharina Raudvere 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mogens Pelt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations