Skip to main content

Policy Space for a Capability-Centered Development Strategy for Latin America

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

Abstract

During the last two decades, Latin American countries have pursued an agenda of widespread market liberalization, commonly referred to as the Washington Consensus. These policies have left Latin American economies—with few exceptions—with a new/old comparative advantage in natural resources, a shrinking manufacturing sector, a growing informal sector, low investment ratios, slow economic growth, more unequal income distribution and rising poverty rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abugattas, L. (2004) Swimming in the Spaghetti Bowl: Challenges for Developing Countries Under theNew Regionalism,” UNCTAD Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities (Study Series, No 27).

    Google Scholar 

  2. — (2005a) “Comentarios y Analisis del Septimo Congreso Nacional de Industriales,” in Sociedad Nacional de Industrias del Peru (ed) Estrategia Industrial para un Desarrollo Nacional Sostenido, Lima, Peru: Sociedad Nacional de Industrias.

    Google Scholar 

  3. — (2005b) State Support Measures for Services: An Exploratory Assessment with Scanty Data, UNCTAD. Mimeo. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Albala-Bertrand, J. M. (2006) “Cambio de la estructura productive en Chile, 1986–1996: producción e interdependencia industrial,” Revista de la CEPAL, 88: 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amsden, A. (2001) The Rise of theRest.Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews, E. L. (May 11, 2006) “House Panel Urges Reworking of Leases for Oil Drilling in US-Owned Waters.” The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arndt, H. (1988) “Market Failure and Under development,” World Development, 16 (2): 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayala, F. and K. Gallagher (2005) “The Subsidies Agreement at the WTO,” IISD, Trade Knowledge Network. Winnipeg, Canada: IISD.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bacchetta, M. and B. Bijit (2003) Industrial Tariff Liberalization and the Doha Development Agenda. WTO Discussion Paper, Geneva: World Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barfield, C. (2001) Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization, Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bradford, C. (2005) Prioritizing Economic Growth: Enhancing Macroeconomic Policy Choice (G-24 Discussion Paper Series, no. 37), Geneva and New York: UNCTAD and Intergovernmental Group of Twenty Four.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bronckers, M. (1999) “Better Rules for a New Millennium: A Warning against Undemocratic Developments in the WTO,” Journal of International Economic Law, 2, 4, 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CEPAL (2004) Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2004. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  14. — (2005) Balance preliminar de las economias de America Latina y el Caribe, Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, H.-J. (2005) Developing Countries Need Tariffs. How WTO NAMA Negotiations Could Deny Developing CountriesRight to a Future, Geneva, Switzerland: South Centre, Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Council of the European Union (2005) “Financial Perspective 2007–2013,” 15915/05, CADREFIN 268, Brussels Available at www.consilium. europa.eu/ue/Docs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/misc/87677.pdf, last accessed February 23, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ECLAC (2006) “Regional Integration in the Western Hemisphere,” Santiago, Chile: International Trade and Integration Division.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, P. (2005) “Neoliberalism as a Political Opportunity: Constraint and Innovation in Contemporary Development Strategy,” in K. Gallagher (ed.) Putting Development First. The Importance of Policy Space in the WTO and International Financial Institutions. London and New York: ZED Books, 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez de Cordoba, S. and D. Vanzetti (2005) “Coping with Trade Reforms,” Geneva: UNCTAD/ITC/TAB.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ffrench-Davis, R. (2005) Reformas para America Latina despues del Fundamentalismo Neoliberal, Argentina: CEPAL-Siglo XXI Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fink, C. and K. Maskus (2004) Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research, New York and London: World Bank and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gallagher, K., ed. (2005) Putting Deroelopment First. The Importance of Policy Space in the WTO and International Financial Institutions, London and New York: ZED Books.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamwey, R. M. (2005) Expanding National Policy Space for Development: Why the Multilateral Trading System Must Change South Centre ( Working Paper no. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hsu, L. (2005) “Non-violation Complaints—WTO Issues and Recent Free Trade Agreements,” Journal of World Trade 39(2): 205–238.

    Google Scholar 

  25. IADB (Inter American Development Bank) (2001) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Competitiveness. The Business of Growth, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. — (2004) “Fiscal Impact of Trade Liberalization in the Americas,” (Periodic Note): January.

    Google Scholar 

  27. — (2005a) Education, Science and Technology in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Statistical Compendium of Indicators. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Available: http://www.iadb.org/sds/publication/publication_4357e.htm/, last accessed February 23, 2008.

  28. — (2005b) Expanding the Knowledge Capital of Latin America and the Caribbean: An IADB Strategy for Education and Training, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Available: http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=582514.

  29. 11DS (lnstituto Internacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable) (2001) “Derechos Privados, Problemas Publicos: Una guia sobre el controvertido capitulo del TLCAN referente a los derechos de los inversionistas,” Winnipeg Canada: IISD.

    Google Scholar 

  30. IMF (International Monetary Fund) Fiscal Affairs Department (2005) “Dealing with the Revenue Consequences of Trade Reform,” Available: www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/021505.htm, last accessed February 23, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kearney, A.T. (2005) “FDI Confidence Index,” Global Business Policy Council, 8. Available: http://www.atkearney.com/main.taf?p=5,3,1,138, last accessed February 23, 2008.

  32. Krueger, A. (2004) “Meant Well, Tried Little, Failed Much: Policy Reforms in Emerging Market Economies,” Remarks at the Roundtable Lecture at the Economic Honors Society, New York University, March 23, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar, N. and K. P. Gallagher (2006) “Preserving Policy Space at the WTO,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lall, S. (2005) “Rethinking Industrial Strategy. The Role of the State in the Face of Globalization,” in K. Gallagher (ed.) Putting Development First. The Importance of Policy Space in the WTO and International Financial Institutions, London and New York: ZED Books, 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Malik K. (2002) “Trade Liberalization and Development: Some Issues.” Paper presented at the IDB-INT/ITP NETAmericas Conference on Integrating the Americas, Washington, DC: November 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mortimore, M. and L. Stanley (2006) “Obsolescencia de la proteccion a los inversores extranjeros después de la crisis argentina,” Revista de la CEPAL, 88: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Paus, E. (2004) “Productivity Growth in Latin America. The Limits of Neoliberal Reforms,” World Development, 32 (3): 427–445.

    Google Scholar 

  38. — (2005) Foreign Investment, Development, and Globalization. Can Costa Rica Become Ireland? New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Paus, E. and K. Gallagher (2006) The Missing Links between Foreign Investment and Develoment. Lessons from Costa Rica and Mexico. Boston, MA: Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University (Working Paper 06–01).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pauwelyn, J. (2005) “Rien Ne Va Plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in GATT and the GATS,” World Trade Review, 4 (2): 131–170.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peres, W. (2006) “El lento retorno de las politicas industrials en America Latina y el Caribe,” Revista de la CEPAL, 88: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peterson, L. (2004) “Bilateral Investment Treaties and Development PolicyMaking,” IISD, November.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Porter, M., K. Schwab, and A. Lopez-Claros, eds. (2005) The Global Competitiveness Report 2005 2006, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Reinhardt, N. and W. Peres (2000) “Latin America’s New Economic Model: Micro Responses and Economic Restructuring,” World Development, 28: 1543–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rodrik, D. (2001) “The Global Governance of Trade As If Development Really Mattered,” New York: UN DP.

    Google Scholar 

  46. — (2004) “Rethinking Growth Policies in the Developing World,” Available: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/—drodrik/Luca_d_Agliano_Lecture_Oct_2004.pdf/, last accessed February 23, 2008.

  47. — (December 2006) “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion?” Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (4): 973–987.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian, and T. Franchesco (June 2004) “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development,” Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (2): 131–165.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shadlen, K. (2008) “Globalization, Power, and Integration: The Political Economy of Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Americas,” Journal of Development Studies, 44 (1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shafaeddin, M. (2006) “Does Trade Openness Favour or Hinder Industrialization and Development? Paper presented at the Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four of International Monetary Affairs,” Geneva, Switzerland: March 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Singh, A., A. Belaish, C. Collins, P. De Masi, R. Krieger, G. Meredith, and R. Rennhack (2005) Stabilization and Reform in Latin America: A Macroeconomic Perspective on the Experience since the Early 1990s, IMF Occasional Paper, February 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stiglitz, J. (1998) “More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Towards the Post-Washington Consensus,” United Nations University. World Institute for Development Economics Research. Available: http://www.wider.unu.edu/events/annuel1998.htm, last accessed February 23, 2008.

  53. UNCTAD (2000) “International Investment Agreements: Flexibility for Development,” UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/18 Series on International Investment Agreements. New York and Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  54. — (2004) “New Geography of International Trade,” TD/404: June.

    Google Scholar 

  55. — (2005) World Investment Report. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wade, R. H. (2003) “What Strategies Are Available for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of ‘Development Space,”’ Review of Internationczl Political Economy, 104: 621–644.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wood, A. (January 1997) “Openness and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries: The Latin American Challenge to East Asian Conventional Wisdom,” World Bank Economic Review, 11: 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  58. World Bank (1993) The Asian Miracle. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  59. — (1994) Adjustment in Africa: Reforms, Results and the Road Ahead. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. — (2002) World Development Report 2002. Building Institutions for Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2006) “The Internet, cross-border trade in services and the GATS: Lessons from US- Gambling,” World Trade Review, 5: 319–355.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yusuf, S. (2003) Innovative Eczst Asicz. The Future of Growth. A World Bank Publication, New York and London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Diego Sánchez-Ancochea Kenneth C. Shadlen

Copyright information

© 2008 Diego Sánchez-Ancochea and Kenneth C. Shadlen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abugattas, L., Paus, E. (2008). Policy Space for a Capability-Centered Development Strategy for Latin America. In: Sánchez-Ancochea, D., Shadlen, K.C. (eds) The Political Economy of Hemispheric Integration. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612945_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics