Skip to main content

The Global Compact and Its Critics: Activism, Power Relations, and Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Chapter
Discipline and Punishment in Global Politics

Abstract

On June 23, 2004, a network of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and other civil society actors, many of them associated with the Alliance for a Corporate-Free United Nations (ACFUN), held a public symposium to discuss the relationship between the United Nations (UN) and the issue of corporate accountability. The occasion for the event was another, quite different gathering, the Global Compact Leaders Summit being held the same day at UN headquarters. The Global Compact Counter-Summit, as the symposium was billed, was devoted primarily to voicing concern and criticism that the UN, particularly through its Global Compact (GC) project, was becoming too closely tied to corporate interests and was compromising its neutrality and integrity as an instrument of global governance. The following month, representatives from ACFUN and other groups participating in the counter-summit issued a Joint Civil Society Statement on the Global Compact and Corporate Accountability, calling for effective measures to enforce corporate accountability in areas such as human rights and the environment (Joint Civil Society Statement 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Amnesty International. 2005. “Contracting Out Human Rights: The Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project. http://web.amnesty.org/library/pdf/POL340122005ENGLISH/$File/POL34012o5.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. 2004. “Global Compact Leaders Summit: NGO Participants Raise Concerns.” http://web.amnesty.org/web/web.nsf/print/ec-letter-240604-eng.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1992. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Trans. Mark Ritter. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, Jem. 2004. “Flags of Inconvenience? The Global Compact and the Future of the United Nations.” ICCSR Research Paper Series No. 22-2004, Nottingham University, ISSN 1479–5124. http://www.globalpolicy.org/reform/business/2004/flags.pdf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. “Communicating Global Activism: Strengths and Vulnerabilities of Networked Politics.” Information, Communication and Society 6, no. 2: 143–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance. 1998. “The Uncivic Culture: Communication, Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31, no. 4: 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, Michael. 2005. “Corporate Social Responsibility: Reinventing the Meaning of Development?” International Affairs 81, no. 3: 515–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, Michael, and Jedrzej George Frynas. 2005. “Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World.” International Affairs 81, no. 3: 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CorpWatch. 2002. “Greenwash + 10: The U.N.’s Global Compact, Corporate Accountability and the Johannesburg Earth Summit.” http://www.corwatch.org/downloads/gw10.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • delia Porta, Donatella, Massimiliano Anretta, and Herbert Reiter. 2006. Globalization from Below. Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethical Corporation. 2007. “The UN Global Compact—Surviving Without Annan.” http://www.ethicalcorp.com/content.asp?ContentID=4928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2005. “Is It Useless to Revolt?” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islam, ed. Janet Afaray and Kevin B. Anderson, 263–67. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Originally published in Le Monde, May 11–12, 1979, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2003. “Society Must Be Defended”: lectures at the College de France 1975–1976. Trans. David Macey. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2000. “Governmentality.” In Power: Vol. 3 of the Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, ed. James Faubion, trans. Robert Hurley and others, 201–22. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1988a. “The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom: An Interview.” In The Final Foucault, ed. James Bernauer and David Rasmussen, trans. J.D. Gauthier, 1–20. London and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1988b. “On Power.” In Michel Foucault. Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Lawrence Kritzman, trans. Alan Sheridan, 96–109. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1988c. “Politics and Reason.” In Michel Foucault. Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Lawrence Kritzman, trans. Alan Sheridan, 57–85. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. Herbert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, 208–26. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980b. “Two Lec tures.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon, trans. Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper, 109–33. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980b. “Two Lectures.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon, trans. Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper, 109–33. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, Jedrzej George. 2005. “The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Companies.” International Affairs 81, no. 3: 581–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey. Greenleaf Publishing. 2004. “The U.N. Global Compact: A Primer on the Principles.” http://www.greenleaf-publishing.com/pdfs/rtbprime.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Steve, and Rorden Wilkinson. 2001. “The Global Compact: Promoting Corporate Responsibility?” Environmental Politics 10, no. 1: 155–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Rhys. 2005. “Globalization, Corporate Responsibility and Poverty.” International Affairs 81, no. 3: 525–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Civil Society Statement on the Global Compact and Corporate Accountability. 2004. http://www.globalpolicy.org/reform/business/2004/07gcstatement.pdf.

  • Martens, Jens. 2004. “Precarious ‘Partnerships’: Six Problems of the Global Compact between Business and the U.N.” New York: Global Policy Forum. http://www.globalpolicy.org/reform/business/2004/0623partnerships.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Peter. 2005. “Citizenship, Accountability and Community: The Limits of the CSR Agenda.” International Affairs 81, no. 3: 541–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, Ellen. 2000. “The Road to the Global Compact: Corporate Power and the Battle over Global Public Policy at the United Nations.” New York: Global Policy Forum, http://www.globalpolicy.org/reform/papers/2000/road.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procacci, Giovanna. 1991. “Social Economy and the Government of Poverty.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 151–66. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John Gerard. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain—Issues, Actors, and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10, no. 4: 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, Ronen. 2004. “The De-Radicalization of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Critical Sociology 30, no. 3: 669–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Penelope. 2004. “Corporate Voluntarism and Human Rights: The Adequacy and Effectiveness of Voluntary Self-Regulation Regimes.” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations 59, no. 1: 101–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jackie, John McCarthy, Clark McPhail, and Boguslaw Augustyn. 2001. “From Protest to Agenda Building: Description Bias in Media Coverage of Protest Events in Washington.” Social Forces 79, no. 4: 1397–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transnational Resource and Action Center. 2000. “Tangled Up in Blue: Corporate Partnerships at the United Nations.” http://www.corpwatch.org/downloads/tangled.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Commission on Human Rights. 2003. “Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights.” http://www.unhcr.ch/huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/E.CN.4.Sub.2.2003.12.Rev.2.En?Opendocument.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Programme. 2002. Guide to the Global Compact: A Practical Understanding of the Vision and Nine Principles. http://uneptie.org/outreach/compact/docs/gcguide.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Compact. 2006. “The Ten Principles.” http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, Peter. 2002. “The Global Compact and Civil Society: Averting a Collision Course.” Development in Practice 12, no. 5: 644–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Donald. 2006. “’Best Practice’ in the Regulation of International Labor Standards: Lessons of the U.S.-Cambodia Textile Agreement.” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 27, no. 3: 357–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Oliver. 2004. “The U.N. Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14, no. 4: 755–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Janie Leatherman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knight, G., Smith, J. (2008). The Global Compact and Its Critics: Activism, Power Relations, and Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Leatherman, J. (eds) Discipline and Punishment in Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612792_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics