Skip to main content

The Just War Tradition and the Invasion of Iraq: A Historical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

The end of the cold war, brought about by the collapse of the Soviet Union, signaled a sea change in the conduct of world politics. One of the more significant changes to take place was the “loosening” of the just war tradition, which has occurred in the wake of the Soviet Union’s disintegration.1 This loosening amounts to a more favorable disposition toward interventionist politics and represents a reversal of the narrowing and tightening of the jus ad bellum that took place over the previous two hundred years. The reality of such a shift was made most visible by the unorthodox just cause arguments that accompanied the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The invasion of Iraq was variously justified by President Bush and Prime Minister Blair in terms of anticipatory war, humanitarian war, and punitive war. These arguments appear alien to the modern jus ad bellum, focused on aggression and self-defense as it is, with which most contemporary just war theorists will be familiar.2 Yet these unorthodox arguments were represented time and again by Bush and Blair as providing a bona fide just cause for war.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 1

  1. William V. O’Brien, The Conduct of Just and Limited Wars (New York: Praeger, 1981), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Turner Johnson, Can Modern War Be Just? (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 2nd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Ignatieff, The Warrior’s Honour (New York: Metropolitan Books, 1997), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  5. James Turner Johnson, Morality and Contemporary Warfare (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. William V. O’Brien, “The Challenge of War: A Christian Realist Perspective,” in Just War Theory, ed. Jean Bethke Elshtain (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), 172.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert H. Jackson, The Global Covenant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William V. O’Brien, War and/or Survival (New York: Doubleday, 1969), 22;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert W. Tucker, The Just War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mary Kaldor, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity, 2001), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. James Turner Johnson, “Threats, Values, and Defence: Does the Defence of Values by Force Remain a Moral Possibility?” in Just War Theory, ed. Jean Bethke Elshtain (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geoffrey Best, Humanity and Warfare (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980), 223.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seyom Brown, The Illusion of Control: Force and Foreign Policy in the 21st Century (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2003), 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William Shawcross, Deliver Us from Evil: Warlords and Peacekeepers in a World of Endless Conflict (London: Bloomsbury, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholas J. Wheeler, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melanie McDonagh, “Can There Be Such a Thing as a Just War?” in The Kosovo Tragedy, ed. Ken Booth (London: Frank Cass, 2001), 289.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michael Walzer, Arguing About War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004), xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mona Fixdal and Dan Smith, “Humanitarian Intervention and Just War,” Mershon International Studies Review 42 (1998): 283–312;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jean Bethke Elshtain, “Just War and Humanitarian Intervention,” Ideas 8, no. 2 (2001): 1–21;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anthony F. Lang, ed., Just Intervention (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. George R. Lucas, “From Jus ad Bellum to Jus ad Pacem: Re-Thinking Just War Criteria for the Use of Military Force for Humanitarian Ends,” in Ethics and Foreign Intervention, ed. Dean K. Chatterjee and Don E. Scheid (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 72–97;

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gregory Reichberg and Henrik Syse, “Humanitarian Intervention: A Case of Offensive Force?,” Security Dialogue 33, no. 3 (2003): 309–22;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. George R. Lucas, “The Role of the International Community in International Community in Just War Tradition—Confronting the Challenges of Humanitarian Intervention and Preemptive War,” Journal of Military Ethics 2, no. 2 (2003): 122–44;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duane L. Cady and Robert L. Phillips, Humanitarian Intervention: Just War Versus Pacifism (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stanley Hoffmann, “Intervention: Should It Go On, Can It Go On?” in Ethics and Foreign Intervention, ed. Dean K. Chatterjee and Don E. Scheid (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Adam Roberts, “Humanitarian War: Military Intervention and Human Rights,” International Affairs 69, no. 3 (1993): 436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Geoffrey Best, War and Law Since 1945 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Francis Lieber, “Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, General Orders No. 100,” in The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Gregory M. Reichberg, Henrik Syse, and Endre Begby (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), 566–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stephen E. Lammers, “Approaches to Limits on War in Western Just War Discourse,” in Cross, Crescent and Sword, ed. James Turner Johnson and John Kelsay (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1990), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hedley Bull, “The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations,” in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, ed. Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. I. A. D. Draper, “Grotius’ Place in the Development of Legal Ideas About War,” in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, ed. Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990), 201–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richard Falk, Law, Morality and War in the Contemporary World (New York: Praeger, 1963), 74.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. J. Coates, The Ethics of War (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997), 156.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Douglas P. Lackey, The Ethics of War and Peace (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989), 33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Cian O’Driscoll

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Driscoll, C. (2008). The Just War Tradition and the Invasion of Iraq: A Historical Perspective. In: The Renegotiation of the Just War Tradition and the Right to War in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612037_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics