Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Secondary Education in a Changing World ((SECW))

Abstract

The years between the two great Holocaust-related events—NBC’s Holocaust and Schindlers List—were a time of steady growth for Holocaust education. Many states followed the state of New Jersey’s lead in forming Holocaust commissions. The popular media covered Holocaust-related events with greater interest—although, for better or for worse, journalists tended to focus specifically on the seemingly bottomless pit of controversies surrounding the event. At the level of higher education, intellectual interest in the Holocaust became more specialized during these years. The first academic chair in Holocaust history was established at Yeshiva University in 1976. Another chair was established at University of California at Los Angles (UCLA) in 1979. Numerous more were established in the 1980s and 1990s. This was in addition to the numerous of departments of Judaic or Hebrew studies around the country, which often focused more on their interests on the event. “Yes, absolutely the chairs have made the Holocaust a special domain,” Saul Friedlander, chair of Holocaust studies at UCLA, explained, “but there is no choice because otherwise it is not taught in any significant way.”1 These Holocaust experts provided journalists with juicy, controversial quotations to fill their pages. As we shall see, in general, at any given time there were those who felt the event was being neglected in American schools and needed more attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. William Honan, “Holocaust Teaching Gaining a Niche, but Method is Disputed,” New York Times, April 12, 1995, B11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Hyman, “New Debate on the Holocaust,” New York Times, September 14, 1980, F65; Kenneth L. Woodward with Eloise Salholz, “Debate Over the Holocaust,” Newsweek, March 10, 1980, 97; Lawrence Feinburg, “The New Impact of the Holocaust,” Washington Post, October 10, 1979, C1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. One exception was a 1978 article in the Chronicle of Higher Education by Ellen Coughlin, which pointed out in its title that “On University Campuses, Interest in the Holocaust Started Long Ago.” May 1, 1978, 1, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russell Chandler, “1st Center for Holocaust Studies To Be Established in Los Angles,” Washington Post, August 26, 1977, C8. Similar centers were established at Yeshiva University in Brooklyn (1975), Temple University (1975), and Brandeis University (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fred Hechinger, “About Education: Educators Seek To Teach Context Of the Holocaust,” New York Times, May 15, 1979, C5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drummond Ayres, “School Critics Press Drive for Old Values,” New York Times, July 25, 1975, A7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwin Barber, “Textbook: Much Labor and Risk,” New York Times, March 23, 1975, Section 4, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elkin, “Minorities in Textbooks,” 504; “Bias Charged in Book Rejection,” New York Times, November 10, 1974, A53; Loewen, Lies My Teacher Told Me, 281.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Social Education 33 (April 1969). See also Elkin, “Minorities in Textbooks”; and “Survey of Textbooks Detects Less Bias against Blacks,” New York Times, March 28, 1973, A13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph Berger, “Once Rarely Explored, the Holocaust Gains Momentum as a School Topic,” New York Times, October 3, 1988, A16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alex Patricia, “Teaching the Holocaust; Genocide Curriculum, as Mandated by the State, Gradually Takes Shape,” The Record (Bergen, NJ), August 30, 1994, B01.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elizabeth Llorente, “Genocide Study Guides Delayed Until New School Year; Still Being Reviewed, Panel Says” The Record, April 26, 1996, A08; “Irish Group in Genocide Study Fight; Wants Famine in Curriculum,” April 30, 1996, A04.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarah Metzgar, “Legislator Wants State to Teach Famine History,” The Times Union (Albany, NY), February 29, 1996, Al.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cavaiani, “Yet Another Unfair Demand on Schools,” The Record (Bergen, NJ), September 15, 1998, L08.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Thomas D. Fallace

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fallace, T.D. (2008). Holocaustomania. In: The Emergence of Holocaust Education in American Schools. Secondary Education in a Changing World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611153_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics