Skip to main content

Lean and Mean: Shakespeare’s Criticism of Thin Privilege

  • Chapter
The Culture of Obesity in Early and Late Modernity
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Fat figures prominently in a number of William Shakespeare’s plays, but most notably in the Henry IV plays I will consider here. That fat is not a self-evident natural bodily category for Shakespeare is apparent in the multiple and even conflicting ways he represents it. Characters see the same fat body of Falstaff in strikingly different and even opposing ways. For the lower-class figures of the tavern world, Falstaff’s fat body is, for the most part, a sign of his greatness and his great generosity and wit. For Hal, who creates a new bodily style to secure his newly achieved authority, the same fat body is a sign of Falstaff’s essential lowliness, excessive appetite, and innate selfishness. In short, fatness represents everything that Hal must suppress if he is to assert his own privilege as a virtuous king.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. C. L. Barber, Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and Its Relation to Social Custom (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959), 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard Spivack, Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil: The History of a Metaphor in Relation to His Major Villains (New York: Columbia University Press, 1958), 203–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. see Patricia A. Parker, Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property (London and New York: Methuen, 1987), 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gayle Whittier, “Falstaff as Welshwoman: Uncomic Adrogyny,” Ball State University Forum 20, no. 3 (Summer 1979): 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also Coppelia Kahn, Man’s Estate: Masculine Ldentity in Shakespeare (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Barbara Everett, “The Fatness of Falstaff: Shakespeare and Character,” Proceedings of the British Academy 76 (1991): esp. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  7. see Hugh Grady, “Falstaff: Subjectivity Between the Carnival and the Aesthetic,” Modern Language Review 96, no. 3 (2001): 609–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Franz Alexander, “A Note on Falstaff,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 2 (1933): 599, 602.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leslie Heywood, Dedication to Hunger: The Anorexic Aesthetic in Modern Culture (Berkeley: University of California, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maud Ellmann, The Hunger Artists: Starving, Writing, and Lmprisonment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Melissa Bradshaw, “Remembering Amy Lowell: Embodiment, Obesity, and the Construction of a Persona,” in Amy Lowell, American Modern, ed. Adrienne Munich and Melissa Bradshaw (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2004), 170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See also Mark Anderson, “Anorexia and Modernism, or How I Learned to Diet in All Directions,” Discourse 11, no. 1 (1988–89): 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellmann, Hunger Artists, 8–9; Hillel Schwartz, Never Satisfied: A Cultural History of Diets, Fantasies, and Fat (New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1986), 140–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Dover Wilson, The Fortunes of Falstaff (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  15. William Shakespeare, The First Part of King Henry IV, ed. John Dover Wilson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  16. William Shakespeare, The Second Part of the History of Henry IV, ed. John Dover Wilson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sander L. Gilman, Fat Boys: A Slim Book (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2004), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  18. William Shakespeare, King Henry IV. Part 1, ed. David Scott Kastan (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2002), 4.2.63–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. William Shakespeare, The Second Part of King Henry IV, ed. A. R. Humphreys (London: Methuen; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966), 5.5.52–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. C. Bradley, “The Rejection of Falstaff” in Oxford Lectures on Poetry (London: Macmillan, 1909), 247–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stephen Jay Greenblatt, “Invisible Bullets,” in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 21–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. William Empson, Some Versions of Pastoral (London: Chatto & Windus, 1935), 102–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jonathan Goldberg, Sodometries: Renaissance Texts, Modern Sexualities (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), 152.

    Google Scholar 

  24. William Shakespeare, King Richard II, ed. Charles R. Forker (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2002), 2.1.73–83, esp. 75, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paul Yachnin, “History, Theatricality, and the ‘Structural Problem’ in the Henry IV Plays,” Philological Quarterly 70, no. 2 (Spring 1991): 169.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harold Jenkins, The Structural Problem in Shakespeare’s Henry the Fourth (London: Methuen, 1956), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  27. (William Shakespeare, Henry IV, Part I, ed. David M. Bevington, Oxford Shakespeare [Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford, UK and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987], 1.3.13 n).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Norbert. Elias, The History of Manners, trans. Edmund Jephcott (New York: Pantheon Books, 1982), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  29. William Shakespeare, The Riverside Shakespeare, ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J. J. M. Tobin (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997), 5.2.613.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nancy A. Gutierrez, ‘Shall She Famish Then?’: Female Food Refusal in Early Modern England, Women and Gender in the Early Modern World (Aldershot, UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003), 2, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harry Berger, Jr., “The Prince’s Dog: Falstaff and the Perils of Speech-Prefixity,” Shakespeare Quarterly 49, no. 1 (Spring 1998): 73.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Kathleen Cohen, Metamorphosis of a Death Symbol: The Transi Tomb in the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance, California Studies in the History of Art (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jean Wirth, La Jeune Fille et la Mort: Recherches sur les Thèmes Macabres dans l’Art Germanique de la Renaissance, Hautes Études Medievales et A’lodernes (Geneva: Droz, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Karl Siegfried Guthke, The Gender of Death: A Cultural History in Art and literature (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Elena Levy-Navarro

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy-Navarro, E. (2008). Lean and Mean: Shakespeare’s Criticism of Thin Privilege. In: The Culture of Obesity in Early and Late Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610439_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics