Advertisement

China’s Constitutionalism

  • Lison Harris
Chapter
  • 245 Downloads

Abstract

China’s extensive legal reforms are often assessed according to its progress toward a liberal democracy, although it has made clear that its intentions lie elsewhere. In the same way, the role of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China is assessed according to Western theories of constitutionalism, sometimes resulting in the conclusion that China has no true legal system. The constitution is nonetheless a vital element of the reform process, as the Chinese Communist Party’s broad power of leadership or government over state institutions is set out in its preamble. The constitution is both the symbol of and the legal justification for the power of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) over government policies in China and is a vital component of the CCP’s strategy for survival—the “life and death” of the party.2 Although the CCP exerts broad ideological control over state policy making and decision making, the growth of the market economy has allowed, or forced, the party to withdraw from the day-to-day affairs of state and to concentrate on consolidating its ideological influence. The constitution defines and legitimizes this ideological framework.

Keywords

Communist Party Chinese Communist Party Liberal Democracy Judicial Review National People 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Chinese Government White Paper, Building of Political Democracy in China, October 2005, ch. 2.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Patrick J. Deneen, Democratic Faith (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), 1.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Thomas Carothers, “The End of the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 6; emphasis in original.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 12.
    Richard Youngs, International Democracy and the West (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 14. See also Pitman Potter’s work on institutional capacity in China.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 18.
    Ian Loveland, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights, 3rd ed. (London: LexisNexis, 2003), 2.Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    Shao-chi Liu, Report on the Draft Constitution of the People’s Republic of China [and] Constitution of the People’s Republic of China (Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1962), 20.Google Scholar
  7. 29.
    Jinsong Jiang, The National People’s Congress of China (Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 2003), 72.Google Scholar
  8. 36.
    Michael W. Dowdle, “The Constitutional Development and Operations of the National People’s Congress,” Columbia Journal of Asian Law 11, no. 1 (1997): 13, citingGoogle Scholar
  9. Murray Scott Tanner, “Organizations and Politics in China’s Post-Mao Law-Making System,” in Domestic Law Reforms in Post-Mao China, ed. Potter Pitman, Studies on Contemporary China (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1994), 61–62, 72–74.Google Scholar
  10. 41.
    Ibid., 17, citing Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  11. 47.
    Stanley B. Lubman, Bird in Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999), 3.Google Scholar
  12. 52.
    Randall Peerenboom, China’s Long March toward Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 55.
    Feng Lin, Constitutional Law in China (Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 2000), para. 1.24.Google Scholar
  14. 57.
    Albert Chen, An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China, 3rd ed. (Hong Kong: LexisNexis, 2004), 40.Google Scholar
  15. 73.
    See Cai Dingjian, “Constitutional Supervision and Interpretation in the People’s Republic of China,” Journal of Chinese Law 9 (1995): 219.Google Scholar
  16. 86.
    See Tom Ginsburg, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), chap. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hualing Fu, Lison Harris, and Simon N. M. Young, eds. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lison Harris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations