Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Day that Changed Everything? ((911))

  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

RATHER THAN INTERNATIONALIST REGIMES REPLACING THE centuries-old institution of the nation-state, many critics have observed a more sinister development: the inexorable expansion of an American imperium. This perspective has attracted further support since the advent of the 2001 war on terrorism, but it had advocates in the post—Cold War era of intervention and even during the Cold War. Connecting the United States to the Roman Empire of antiquity has been popular for some time, and the recent clash with the neighboring civilization of Islam has renewed interest in this comparison.1 In addition, comparisons to the British Empire have been popular as well, although as one prominent author on the topic noted, few outside of the intelligentsia articulate an image of the United States having emerged as a new global empire.2 Cold War—era explorations frequently debated the hegemonic role of the United States, or, when comparing the American system to earlier empires, debates were in the context of the decline versus the expansion or persistence of American power.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter Bender, “America: The New Roman Empire?” Orbis 47, no. 1 (Winter 2003): 145–59.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niall Ferguson, Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power (New York: Basic, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susan Strange, “The Future of the American Empire,” Journal of International Affairs 42, no. 1 (Fall 1988): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic (New York: Metropolitan, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Patrick J. Buchanan, A Republic, Not an Empire (New York: Regnery, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robert Hunter Wade, “The Invisible Hand of American Empire,” Ethics and International Affairs 17, no. 2 (2003): 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rob Kroes, “American Empire and Cultural Imperialism: A View from the Receiving End,” Diplomatic History 23, no. 3 (Summer 1999): 463–77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andrew J. Bacevich, American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002); Andrew J. Bacevich, “Steppes to Empire,” The National Interest 68 (Summer 2002): 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walter Russell Mead, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (New York: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), xi.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Benjamin Barber, Jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World (New York: Ballantine, 1996). McWorld is meant to denote the globalized culture that has evolved from the shaping of international free market forces.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hardt and Negri, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andrew J. Bacevich and Sebastian Mallaby, “New Rome, New Jerusalem,” Wilson Quarterly 26, no. 3 (Summer 2002): 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ellen Ruppel Shell, “New World Syndrome,” Atlantic Monthly 287, no. 6 (June 2001): 50–53, available full-text online at http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/06/shell-pl.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Hardt and Negri, Empire, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Publius [James Madison], The Federalist No. 43: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered (continued) (January 23, 1788), accessed online at http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa39.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Publius [James Madison], The Federalist No. 39: Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles (January 16, 1788), accessed online at http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa39.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carl A. Castro and Amy B. Adler, “OPTEMPO: Effects on Soldier and Unit Readiness,” Parameters 29, no. 3 (Autumn 1999): 86–95; U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) had 213,000 Army personnel in 1990 and 62,000 by 1999; from 1945 to 1989, USAREUR participated in 29 peacekeeping or humanitarian missions; from 1991 (after the Gulf War) to 1999, it took part in over 100 such missions.

    Google Scholar 

  19. United States General Accounting Office, Military Personnel: Perspectives of Surveyed Service Members in Retention Critical Specialties, GAO/NSAID-99197BR (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, August 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. James Hosek and Mark Totten, Serving Away from Home: How Deployments Influence Reenlistment, MR-1594-OSD (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002); Ronald D. Fricker, Jr., The Effects of Perstempo on Officer Retention in the U.S. Military, MR-1556-OSD (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Michael Polich and Ron Sortor, Deployments and Army Personnel Tempo, MR-1417-A (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Michael Polich, Bruce R. Orvis, and W. Michael Hix, Small Deployments, Big Problems, IR-197 (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See the Army Stabilization Task Force work at https://www.stabilization.army.mil/.

    Google Scholar 

  24. James T. Quinlivan, “Force Requirements in Stability Operations,” Parameters 25, no. 4 (Winter 1995): 59–69; James T. Quinlivan, “Burden of Victory: The Painful Arithmetic of Stability Operations,” Rand Review 27, no. 2 (Summer 2003): 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Quinlivan, “Force Requirements in Stability Operations,” 62.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeffrey Record, Bounding the Global War on Terrorism (Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, December 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Matthew J. Morgan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, M.J. (2008). American Empire. In: The American Military After 9/11. The Day that Changed Everything?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610156_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics