Abstract
The interest of the American and British public in the practice of torture, in the wake of Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and the still somewhat secret prison camps in Europe and Asia, is part of a long-standing fascination with the Middle Ages, or rather with a popular image of the period, epitomized in Ving Rhames’s indelible line in Pulp Fiction, “I’m gonna get medieval on your ass.”1 The fascination has grown in this decade under the influence of world events, or rather of widespread American impressions of world events. After the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, American commentators often wrote of the Taliban regime, or of the country as a whole, as “medieval,”2 and network TV correspondents often spoke of the feeling that they had stepped back in time.3 The 2003 invasion of Iraq brought similar comments about the “medieval mindset” of the global enemy and the “medieval barbarity” of Saddam Hussein’s rule.4 Reports of “medieval torture devices” were common in print and broadcast media and on the Internet,5 and Hussein’s use of torture on his subjects at Abu Ghraib prison was one reason given for the invasion, along with the weapons of mass destruction, aluminum centrifuge tubes, and yellowcake uranium from Niger. After the revelation in 2004 of the ongoing U.S. practice of torture at the same prison, liberals decried Bush’s medieval methods, and conservatives defended them as the necessary response to a barbarous enemy. (They forced us to get medieval on their asses.) Both sides agreed that the methods were medieval, and both sides shared an understanding of the term.
The main thing is to make the prisoner feel that he does not belong to the same species.
—Jean-Paul Sartre, Introduction to The Question by Henri Alleg
We in the army of God, in the house of God, kingdom of God have been raised for such a time as this.
—Lt. Gen. William Boykin
Torture is only cruel and unusual if we don’t do it all that often.
—Stephen Colbert, The Colbert Report
This essay examines the history and practice of torture from the Middle Ages through the Renaissance to contemporary times, in order to trace some of the lines separating “judicial torture” from “punitive torment” (or “village games” sadism), and to also show how the U.S. government’s current use of torture is indeed “medieval,” but in a more complex and troublesome way than popular understanding of the term comprehends
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Shelley Emling, “Program Twists Torture into TV,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 27 February 2005: A3.
Henri Alleg, The Question (New York: George Braziller, 1958). This is the American edition of Alleg’s La Question (Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1958), which at the time was banned in France, circulated underground in that country, and smuggled abroad. Its translator is unidentified but is likely to have been Braziller.
See Alfred McCoy, A Question of Torture ( New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006 ), pp. 8–9.
Seymour Hersh, Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib ( New York: HarperCollins, 2004 ), p. 39.
Barbara Tuchman, A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century ( New York: Ballantine Books, 1978 ), p. 135.
Nicholas Orme, Medieval Children ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001 ), p. 179.
Jim Hightower, Thieves in High Places: They’ve Stolen Our Country and It’s Time to Take It Back ( New York: Viking, 2003 ), p. 14.
Aristotle, The Art of Rhetoric, ed. and trans. John Henry Freese ( New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1926 ), pp. 162–63.
On the medieval transition to evidentiary proceedings, see, for example Peters, Torture, pp. 41–48; John H. Langbein, Torture and the Law of Proof ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977 ), pp. 4–8;
Henry Charles Lea, Torture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1973), pp. 53–59; and Peters, “Introduction,” in Lea, Torture pp. ix-x. These commentators note that torture, as a device of trial by evidence, in theory reflects a commitment to rational processes, as opposed to the irrational proofs of oath and ordeal.
Henry Charles Lea, The Inquisition of the Middle Ages (1887; repr. New York: Citadel Press, 1963), p. 123; Lea, Torture, p. 37.
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Pantheon, 1977 ), p. 11.
Page duBois, Torture and Truth ( New York: Routledge, 1991 ), p. 42.
Jennifer K. Harbury, “From the Latin American Torture Cells,” in Jennifer K. Harbury, Truth, Torture, and the American Way: The History and Consequences of US Involvement in Torture ( Boston: Beacon Press, 2005 ), pp. 56–104.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Eileen A. Joy, Myra J. Seaman, Kimberly K. Bell, and Mary K. Ramsey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guthrie, S. (2007). Torture, Inquisition, Medievalism, Reality, TV. In: Joy, E.A., Seaman, M.J., Bell, K.K., Ramsey, M.K. (eds) Cultural Studies of the Modern Middle Ages. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610040_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610040_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53432-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61004-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)